How Tough is Sydney Marathon Course?
#1
Posted 21 July 2011 - 04:30 PM
I'd like to hear from people who've run the FM course previously to get an idea of how hard the layout is. I've looked at the course profile and noticed there are quite a few hilly sections throughout but also what appear to be some pretty flat sections. Recently ran my first marathon at the GC in 3.45 and definitely feel like I can go faster but I'm aware of the obvious difference in course profiles. Hill and speed training is already a part of my program so the training is getting there I just want to hear people's experiences in tackling this course.
Cheers
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 21 July 2011 - 05:25 PM
Edited: Sorry just looked at the top!
Edited by runhard, 21 July 2011 - 05:26 PM.
#3
Posted 21 July 2011 - 05:47 PM
What does FM stand for?
#4
Posted 21 July 2011 - 05:49 PM
#5
Posted 21 July 2011 - 06:34 PM
Gold Coast is definitely the flattest, but the second half of it would have to be the most boring 21k of a marathon that you could ever run.
#6
Posted 21 July 2011 - 07:15 PM
#7
Posted 21 July 2011 - 07:30 PM
Having a few ups and downs really breaks up the race and I reckon makes it more enjoyable (every thing else being equal).
OK, its going to be a bit harder, but if you have already done a 3:45 set that as your pace, then see how you feel in the closing stages.
#8
Posted 21 July 2011 - 07:36 PM
Digger, on 21 July 2011 - 07:15 PM, said:
Anyway back on subject - yes sydney marathon was harder in 2006 on the second half due to the long run out to the west, escpecially in the heat - but the course is now improved - considered not as tough. Having said that - the weather is a bigger factor than the terrain at Sydney as it can turn very warm and humid.
#9
Posted 21 July 2011 - 08:07 PM
halfwaydown, on 21 July 2011 - 07:36 PM, said:
I almost spat myself out the back at 35km, but dug deep and was back with the group and leading at 37km. We also spat out some pretender, who found out how tough life could be at about 21km, I think his name was Tony Abbott.
#10
Posted 22 July 2011 - 12:18 AM
halfwaydown, on 21 July 2011 - 07:36 PM, said:
Although the course changed last year, I say the heat factor is still the hardest part of the race.
It did get hot out there.
Some are more vulnerable to the heat, but Sydney was my PW at 4h31, and the marathon before and after (Adelaide 5 weeks prior, Melbourne 3 weeks after - both cool conditions) I managed a 3h30.
As for the elevation etc of the course, it's not that great a deal. The start at the bridge, and again in Hyde Park. A few more inclines towards the 35 or 36km mark and again at ~37 I think.
#11
Posted 22 July 2011 - 07:45 AM
#12
Posted 22 July 2011 - 08:08 AM
#13
Posted 22 July 2011 - 08:17 AM
langswm, on 21 July 2011 - 06:34 PM, said:
Gold Coast is definitely the flattest, but the second half of it would have to be the most boring 21k of a marathon that you could ever run.
Why are you concerned about the scenery in a marathon - or any other race for that matter? You're there to run as fast as you can, not view the scenery.
If you want to enjoy the scenery, do a gentle training jog.
#14
Posted 22 July 2011 - 08:46 AM
I disagree. Last year at Sydney I only ran the half, but as I went under the harbour bridge nearing home my pace picked up significantly, more than ever in any race I had done before. It was the sight of the Opera house, the harbour, and the finish line just a few kms away. It really inspired me. Sydney remains my half PB (for a few more weeks anyway).
And yes, it is quite hilly. Early on there is a climb at the start line, one up Macquarie St, and up out of the gardens. Then there are a few short sharp hills towards the end near Ultimo. However, I enjoyed the course and found the hills OK.
I have run Gold Coast 3 times and Melbourne, and although Melbourne is hillier I would say its a faster course. Because of the variation you get the chance to work different muscle groups in your legs.....
#15
Posted 22 July 2011 - 08:46 AM
Davo, on 22 July 2011 - 08:17 AM, said:
If you want to enjoy the scenery, do a gentle training jog.
If thats your modus operadi, Davo, then feel free to go for you life and run a big mara pb running 100+ laps of a 400m track!
#16
Posted 22 July 2011 - 09:03 AM
langswm, on 22 July 2011 - 08:46 AM, said:
I've run 6hr, 12hr and 24hr races on the track and they're great fun!
Try it sometime, you'll be surprised.
When I want to enjoy the scenery I jump in the car or do a gentle sightseeing jog. When I'm in a race I couldn't give a bugger whether we're running through a ghetto or the most beautiful scenery in the world. I'm there to run as fast as I can (which ain't very fast, I admit), not enjoy the scenery.
However, I've aired this opinion before, both on CR and amongst fellow runners, and met plenty of opposition, so I guess it's a case of "Whatever Turns you On."
Good luck, enjoy the scenery if you must, and have a great race.
#17
Posted 22 July 2011 - 09:04 AM
twosheds, on 22 July 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:
#18
Posted 22 July 2011 - 09:07 AM
Davo, on 22 July 2011 - 09:03 AM, said:
I've run 6hr, 12hr and 24hr races on the track and they're great fun!
Try it sometime, you'll be surprised.
When I want to enjoy the scenery I jump in the car or do a gentle sightseeing jog. When I'm in a race I couldn't give a bugger whether we're running through a ghetto or the most beautiful scenery in the world. I'm there to run as fast as I can (which ain't very fast, I admit), not enjoy the scenery.
However, I've aired this opinion before, both on CR and amongst fellow runners, and met plenty of opposition, so I guess it's a case of "Whatever Turns you On."
Good luck, enjoy the scenery if you must, and have a great race.
We feel for you Davo, stuck in beautiful Tasmania - all that bl**din scenery, how it must affect your training.
#19
Posted 22 July 2011 - 09:19 AM
Davo, on 22 July 2011 - 08:17 AM, said:
If you want to enjoy the scenery, do a gentle training jog.
In marathons we may only get glimpses of scenery and - for sure - over the last ten k our senses can be overwhelmed by the task at hand but I still get some enjoyment from my surroundings and a certain feeling from a nice, historical course. City to Surf is probably the best example I have experienced. Heartbreak Hill is a special piece of pavement; taking a glimpse back over the sea of people just after the start is a sight etched in my memory; and what about coming around that last turn towards the finish at Bondi? It can be magic.
I am not in races to enjoy the scenery -or the ambiance for that matter- but sometimes they just make the race more fun and memorable.
Edited by iRonnie, 22 July 2011 - 09:26 AM.
#20
Posted 22 July 2011 - 09:36 AM
Halfwaydown, I love the scenery in Tasmania! It's just that I don't take any notice of it when I'm in an actual race. The rest of the time I really do appreciate it.
#21
Posted 22 July 2011 - 10:41 AM
#22
Posted 22 July 2011 - 12:26 PM
Good luck by the way. Will be interested in your observations once you've finished.
Edited by langswm, 22 July 2011 - 12:27 PM.
#23
Posted 22 July 2011 - 12:26 PM
halfwaydown, on 22 July 2011 - 09:04 AM, said:
#24
Posted 22 July 2011 - 12:33 PM
....but thats a whole nuther story!
#25
Posted 22 July 2011 - 01:07 PM
Unlikelyrunner, on 22 July 2011 - 08:46 AM, said:
I disagree. Last year at Sydney I only ran the half, but as I went under the harbour bridge nearing home my pace picked up significantly, more than ever in any race I had done before. It was the sight of the Opera house, the harbour, and the finish line just a few kms away. It really inspired me. Sydney remains my half PB (for a few more weeks anyway).
And yes, it is quite hilly. Early on there is a climb at the start line, one up Macquarie St, and up out of the gardens. Then there are a few short sharp hills towards the end near Ultimo. However, I enjoyed the course and found the hills OK.
I have run Gold Coast 3 times and Melbourne, and although Melbourne is hillier I would say its a faster course. Because of the variation you get the chance to work different muscle groups in your legs.....
With respect I would say that none of the marathons mentioned here are hilly. Sydney is at best undulating. A true hilly marathon (at least for the first 16K) is Auckland. I like Sydney as it presents a challenge (and because the old course is my PB). Both Sydney and Auckland have the awesome habour run into the finish and although you are hurting by the final water station near the bridge, once you come round the final bend and have the mile to run round the foreshore you start to open up again and go hard with all that is left.
#27
Posted 22 July 2011 - 02:38 PM
Hope this helps.
#28
Posted 22 July 2011 - 02:42 PM
The great thing about having trained through to your second marathon is that you also have the benefit of the training for your first in your legs plus the experience of your debut.
It could easily be a PB for you.
#29
Posted 22 July 2011 - 02:50 PM
rodthehornet, on 22 July 2011 - 02:38 PM, said:
Hope this helps.
One thing he missed or might not of encontered.
I paced the 4:15 bus last year and you had to cross over a temporary bridge as I was crossing the bridge was totally filled by runners the problems was the lead wheel chair competitor came flying the other way.
I was amazed nobody got hurt.
So please be careful and follow course marshals instruction when told to stay left or any other instruction do so.
#30
Posted 24 July 2011 - 06:24 AM
I do like a course with a bit of scenery but have to admit to missing most of the places of any tourist interest when I ran the Barcelona marathon and the going got tough. I was amazed when I was out sightseeing on the Monday and Tuesday after the race to find all the places I was going to see had a mysterious blue line painted right in front of their doorsteps. I could remember the hills I was running up but as pain set in I looked more and more at my feet and missed just about everything of any tourist interest.
I have to say that it is crowds that tend to make races for me rather than the scenery. There is nothing better than getting off a plane and feeling marathon fever has hit town days before the event like it does in Boston, Rotterdam or Newcastle for the Great North Run. All 3 of those courses would be pretty bleak if you ran them on a Tuesday morning on their own but come alive when they are lined throughout the route by amazing crowds. From what I have heard Sydney is very much City to Surf's poor relation in terms of size of event and crowds which would be a shame as the everybody's a superstar treatment you get in big races can be such a spur on.
#31
Posted 24 July 2011 - 08:41 AM
2 some of the best scenery is when you are 100% fresh, ie running over The Bridge (see 1), so you do get a chance to take it in. Gazing at feet to ensure you haven't inadvertently lost one comes later.
3 agree re crowds. Did the innagural Brighton (UK) marathon a couple of years ago and was blown away by the crowd numbers and support
4 to answer the question originally posed: Sydney Marathon is the hardest most grueling city marathon ever and all entrants deserve a very large tax break from the government to account for their obvious Hero status. Any claims otherwise are just poor attempts at self promotion to attempt to claim Hero status.
#32
Posted 24 July 2011 - 09:20 AM
Unlikelyrunner, on 22 July 2011 - 08:46 AM, said:
I have run Gold Coast 3 times and Melbourne, and although Melbourne is hillier I would say its a faster course. Because of the variation you get the chance to work different muscle groups in your legs.....
Were on drugs when you ran these?
You must have bee hallucinating.
Relative to live, these are Flat.
#33
Posted 24 July 2011 - 01:51 PM
Digger, on 24 July 2011 - 09:20 AM, said:
You must have bee hallucinating.
Relative to live, these are Flat.
Well put mate - I agree Melbourne and the Goldie are both flat! In fact feel free to correct me, but I was always told that anyone running a particular time on the old Sydney course, could expect to knock off 5 - 7 minutes on that on the Goldie or Melbourne.
#34
Posted 24 July 2011 - 02:03 PM
Caniggia33, on 24 July 2011 - 06:24 AM, said:
There are a number of reasons why the events are different in size and personally I doubt you would ever get a marathon anywhere in Australia with the same numbers as a London or New York or City to Circus.
The Sydney Running Festival is far better organised than the Circus and they treat runners as people. Granted the price is not the cheapest, but Wayne Larden and his team treat you like more than just a number. Suggestions are actively welcomed and acted on. Biggest bonus of The Sydney Marathon is the absence of Fairfax. The Circus are only numbers driven.
It is wrong to equate The Sydney running festival to the City to Circus. What you have to remember is that the Circus runs through more suburban neighbourhoods and people can watch from their driveways or verandahs etc. People do watch the marathon in September and in fact an enduring feature of the old course was the party goers spilling out from Oxford Street and trying to keep pace.
#35
Posted 24 July 2011 - 03:43 PM
After running the previous course with City west link and Observatory Hill I said I wouldn't run Sydney again it was too hot for a BOPer.
I loved the turns at Centennial Park as I saw lots of friends who were in front of me running and so everytime I saw them I received (and gave) a cheer, which was a huge boost.
And of course there was the legendary CR cheer squad at the MCA, on the way back I kept counting off the kms till I got back to them.
I am planning that I will be there in September.
#36
Posted 24 July 2011 - 05:15 PM
I hope I feel the same.
twosheds
#37
Posted 24 July 2011 - 08:44 PM
I have ran both GC and Sydney and if aiming for a PB would take GC anyday over Sydney
#38
Posted 24 July 2011 - 09:08 PM
Rach
#39
Posted 25 July 2011 - 09:25 AM
Had 19 and a bit miles in the sunshine and swirling wind today (carnoustie is always windy as anybody that likes their golf will know) and it was tough. Training for such an early Autumn marathon is pretty tough as I have to do it in the warmest months of the year even though they are nowhere near the temperatures you lot get. There is a lot to be said for running Autumn marathons in late October/early November where the bulk of the miles are in September and beyond when it is a bit cooler. What does the song say only mad dogs and marathon runners go out in the midday sun.
#40
Posted 25 July 2011 - 11:54 AM
walshy2, on 24 July 2011 - 08:44 PM, said:
#41
Posted 26 July 2011 - 05:48 AM
#42
Posted 26 July 2011 - 09:22 AM
Caniggia33, on 26 July 2011 - 05:48 AM, said:
It amazes me how many people spend energy fretting about the weather in a marathon or other race. Surely you do your training expecting any sort of weather and then are ready on the day or adjust accordingly?? Do some sauna time to build up heat resistence and run in a tracksuit in the middle of the day ala Ron Clarke. Am I making this too easy or perhaps it is just me...
I will be very happy to see some sun on the day after all this rain we have had although last year it was ideal in overcast and about 19c. Many should have run PBs in that weather, but there was still whinging about 'the heat'. 2009 I ran my PB in the heat where it did get up to about 27c and given that I finished in just over 3 hours, I reckon it could have gotten hotter if you were further down the field.
The weather is part and parcel of the challenge (you are there to test yourself against the course, the clock and the weather) and none of us can control it - put it out of your mind and concentrate on running hard from the get go. Good luck!
#43
Posted 26 July 2011 - 09:47 AM
Caniggia33, on 26 July 2011 - 05:48 AM, said:
Having said that - the running gods have been kind to us these past few months which has seen ideal running conditions generally - so chances are it could be perfect on the day.
Or to super summer-ize Supersam1979 - No Worries, Mate!
#44
Posted 26 July 2011 - 11:07 AM
#45
Posted 08 August 2011 - 09:25 PM
I've been trying to hunt down some meaningful stats for you to give you some perspective. The below info is historical data from the BOM website (www.bom.gov.au). Mean max temp in Sept is 20 degrees, lowest max temp is 9.5 degrees, mean 9am relative humidity is 62% (second lowest annually).
So, if you go by historical data, Sydney weather is very favourable to marathon running. I haven't compared this to either Melbourne or Gold Coast, but I think you'll find it compares favourably (on average). But of course this will vary from day to day and year to year - but on average, Sydney is a good place to run (weather wise).
In terms of 'toughness' in terms of "hillyness" (is that a word - it is now), of course Gold Coast is without doubt the fastest in Australia (possibly the world - except for downhill courses), but I would probably compare Sydney (new course) to Melbourne on pretty even terms (correct me if you think I'm wrong). But what Sydney does have (I think above the other, and possibly most marathons) - is a spectacular course that offers a range of different sceneries that are interesting and do take your mind of the pain / monotony / boredom of many other courses. Some undulations to me is positive, it breaks up the muscle fatigue and gives you a break from exactly the same stride pattern which could make you fatigue faster.
Anyway, I will admit I am a bit bias as the Race Director, but just thought I'd provide a bit of data for you to ponder as opposed to anecdotal experiences.
Good luck to you all in the final weeks of your prep!
Cheers
Wayne
Mean maximum temperature (°C) 25.925.824.722.419.416.916.317.820.022.123.625.221.71531859
2011

Mean minimum temperature (°C)18.718.817.614.711.59.38.08.911.113.615.617.5Statistic ElementJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberMean maximum temperature (Degrees C) for years 1859 to 2011 25.925.824.722.419.416.916.317.82022.123.625.2Mean maximum temperature (°C) 25.925.824.722.419.416.916.317.820.022.123.625.221.71531859
2011

Mean minimum temperature (°C)18.718.817.614.711.59.38.08.911.113.615.617.5Mean maximum temperature (°C) 25.925.824.722.419.416.916.317.820.022.123.625.221.715318592011

Mean minimum temperature (°C)18.718.817.614.711.59.38.08.911.113.615.617.5Lowest maximum temperature (Degrees C) for years 1859 to 2011 17.215.616.213.811.39.77.79.19.512.113.715.2
Mean 9am relative humidity (%) for years 1955 to 2010 717474727474716662616667
halfwaydown, on 26 July 2011 - 09:47 AM, said:
Having said that - the running gods have been kind to us these past few months which has seen ideal running conditions generally - so chances are it could be perfect on the day.
Or to super summer-ize Supersam1979 - No Worries, Mate!
http://www.bom.gov.a...Data=
Sorry guys, just saw that the data doesn't make much sense, I'll try to put into a spreadsheet for you, but here's a link to where I got the info.
W
#46
Posted 08 August 2011 - 09:31 PM
#47
Posted 08 August 2011 - 10:58 PM
I haven't done Sydney for the last two years and I'm really looking forward to checking out the new course. Hoping for a new PB so I've got my fingers crossed it's faster that M7 Cities!
#48
Posted 08 August 2011 - 11:20 PM
Wayne
Whippet gal, on 08 August 2011 - 10:58 PM, said:
I haven't done Sydney for the last two years and I'm really looking forward to checking out the new course. Hoping for a new PB so I've got my fingers crossed it's faster that M7 Cities!
#49
Posted 08 August 2011 - 11:25 PM
I agree with your sentiment. There is absolutely nothing any of us can do about the weather other than prepare for it. I posted some historical data earlier but I think the last three years have thrown up 2 reasonably warm days of about 23 (or so by about 11 or noon) and last year I think I recall it being a bit cooler (but I have to admit when I'm running around making sure everything is running to plan I don't have a good temperature gauge on me).
So, as Supersam says, if you are worried about it being hot then I'd suggest you train in the middle of the day from now until race day to get used to it. The other important thing to do is make sure you are well hydrated before race day and during the race, drink as much as you can! Hydration (or lack of) is probably the single biggest performance factor (other than fitness) on race day.
So once again, just get out there, train and get excited about the big day!
Cheers
Wayne
Supersam1979, on 26 July 2011 - 09:22 AM, said:
I will be very happy to see some sun on the day after all this rain we have had although last year it was ideal in overcast and about 19c. Many should have run PBs in that weather, but there was still whinging about 'the heat'. 2009 I ran my PB in the heat where it did get up to about 27c and given that I finished in just over 3 hours, I reckon it could have gotten hotter if you were further down the field.
The weather is part and parcel of the challenge (you are there to test yourself against the course, the clock and the weather) and none of us can control it - put it out of your mind and concentrate on running hard from the get go. Good luck!
#50
Posted 09 August 2011 - 01:06 PM
Or did I not see it??















