Dextrose
#1
Posted 30 September 2011 - 04:24 PM
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 01 October 2011 - 07:39 AM
#3
Posted 01 October 2011 - 10:26 PM
A bit off topic though ....I've got a jar of Glucose in the pantry as I needed it for cooking something in particular. I was actually wondering if it's better to have a teaspoon of that in my cup of coffee compared to having a teaspoon of sugar? Sugar being essentially fructose (well from what I understand anyway).
Yeah shouldn't believe everything you hear on tv but on a morning show there was a bloke who was basically saying how bad sugar is for you and you should use dextrose instead because sugar just gets deposited as fat. The problem I had is that he was basically saying to lose weight all you have to do is cut out sugar, and apart from that you can eat as much of whatever else you like.
Personally I'm more of an "anything in moderation" kind of person, you can't just cut out one aspect of your diet and expect a miracle!
#4
Posted 02 October 2011 - 05:38 AM
Sounds like the CF friend may have just needed to add some carbohydrate to her diet and dextrose was what she fid it with. More than likely anything like honey, fruit, sugar, sports drink etc would have worked.
#5
Posted 02 October 2011 - 06:17 AM
Jason M, on 02 October 2011 - 05:38 AM, said:
Sort of, sucrose (table sugar) is a molecule of glucose and one of fructose.
Both glucose & fructose have the same empirical formula C6H12O6, however they differ structurally, fructose adopting a cyclic six-membered structure.
#6
Posted 02 October 2011 - 09:37 AM
#7
Posted 02 October 2011 - 10:01 AM
#9
Posted 02 October 2011 - 12:46 PM
brewer, on 02 October 2011 - 06:17 AM, said:
Sort of, sucrose (table sugar) is a molecule of glucose and one of fructose.
Both glucose & fructose have the same empirical formula C6H12O6, however they differ structurally, fructose adopting a cyclic six-membered structure.
Okay - genuine question here, trying to get a better understanding here, no agenda.
Given that the fructose structure is so similar to glucose, what is behind the current thinking that fructose is a substantial contributor to obesity, or is that just an effect of its use in High Fructose Corn Syrup? Do they interact differently with the body during the digestive process?
#10
Posted 02 October 2011 - 03:40 PM
#11
Posted 02 October 2011 - 07:49 PM
From memory the body's normal reaction to excess glucose is for the bowel to suddenly 'dump' it (hence the rush for the toilets early in the marathon as people go that little bit too far with the sports drinks and gu's), would that happen with fructose?
The only sports drink I've come across with glucose only is the Staminade in its pre-mix form (as in you add water), everything else seems to have various degrees of fructose and the thousand other terms they substitute in to further muddy the waters.
#12
Posted 03 October 2011 - 05:14 AM
#13
Posted 28 October 2011 - 04:28 PM
#14
Posted 28 October 2011 - 04:47 PM
Greenman, on 28 October 2011 - 04:28 PM, said:
Another supposed problem is that your body doesn't register the calories coming from sucrose, as opposed to all other sugars (and food types). So for example, if you eat something 'worth' 200 calories but 100 calories comes from sucrose, then your body only thinks it's had 100 calories (the non-sucrose part). It then wants to eat another 100 calories worth to get to the 200 it's needing to feel satisfied, so you go and eat another 100 calories. The result is your body thinks it's eaten 200 calories, when in fact it's eaten 300 calories.
#15
Posted 30 October 2011 - 04:57 PM
#17
Posted 07 November 2011 - 10:31 AM
vat, on 02 October 2011 - 07:49 PM, said:
From memory the body's normal reaction to excess glucose is for the bowel to suddenly 'dump' it (hence the rush for the toilets early in the marathon as people go that little bit too far with the sports drinks and gu's), would that happen with fructose?
The only sports drink I've come across with glucose only is the Staminade in its pre-mix form (as in you add water), everything else seems to have various degrees of fructose and the thousand other terms they substitute in to further muddy the waters.
I thing that all the dumping epizodes are fructose related not glucose at all
and yes all so called "sport " drinks are fructose based
however there is very cheap glucose available from supermarket, on the shelves in safeway it is with the bakeing tools and baking suplemets -
glucose has honey like consistency but is completely clear like a liquid glass
#18
Posted 07 November 2011 - 11:00 AM
MrUniqueName, on 28 October 2011 - 04:47 PM, said:
Can't get that logic, sorry. That's not how energy replacement works. You are confusing satiation with enegy requirement.
Strange logic given the company in your signature














