Trail Shoes
#1
Posted 27 December 2006 - 08:43 PM
I feel every stone or rock that I step on. I also find I lose traction on steep hills.
I would like to know what other Kayano runners use for Trail shoes ( I overpronate so I would like to find the equivalent Trail shoe) and are trail shoes worth the expense or should I persevere with the
kayano's.
Support our Australian advertisers:
#3
Posted 28 December 2006 - 10:02 PM
#4
Posted 29 December 2006 - 07:32 AM
Edited by Kato, 29 December 2006 - 07:33 AM.
#5
Posted 29 December 2006 - 08:50 AM
#6
Posted 29 December 2006 - 01:02 PM
The Salomons are a bit lower to the ground, and the grip is great. Really breathable and quick drying. I did a 24hr Rogaine in them when they were brand new, and was comfortable the whole time. I can still feel rocks underfoot though... maybe that is a bit of 'The Princess and the Pea' syndrome?
#7
Posted 30 December 2006 - 04:55 PM
MikeyBoy, on Dec 29 2006, 08:50 AM, said:
The biggest effect that a great trail shoe has is to improve your confidence on descending and cornering quickly, by giving you a feel of better control and balance. Find your weakness (mine was simply that I didn't trust my shoes on loose surfaces and was therefore hesitant to keep my weight forward), use the shoes until you are confident, and then experiment again with road shoes. You'll find you still run fast, even down hills and around corners, and on less technical trails they might make you faster.
#8
Posted 02 January 2007 - 07:48 PM
I truly recommend the Cascadia for when the terrain gets serious, and they seem to compliment the Kayano well.
#9
Posted 02 January 2007 - 10:08 PM
#10
Posted 02 January 2007 - 11:19 PM
sounds like your geography may limit your choice in footwear options.
from a true sneaker freaker, here are some points (some already mentioned) you should consider in a trail running shoe
obviously terrain makes a difference - lets assume uneven, gravelly ground wet and dry with the occasional rock for the sake of the argument
low profile midsole - the closer you are to the ground the less likely you are to roll - also provides better 'feel' of the surface you are on (proprioception) which increases your body's instinctive protective reactions and reduces the risk of injury
grip - some multi directional and chunky lugs (grip patterns and design) will provide adequate traction
reinforced upper - especially on the lateral and medial (outer and inner) sides of the shoe and toe protection - will provide better side to side stability, ascending and descending at speed
not necessary to have as much, if any, dual density - having medial support in your shoe (duomax in Kayanos) over long term use on trail surfaces can compress the lateral aspect of the midsole and promote foot and ankle rolls
the right fit - fit is critical in any performance shoe - you can modify or change innersoles to provide a better fit
although I don't like to favour brands or models, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the serious trail shoes on the market at the moment
good luck in your quest
samplesize
Edited by samplesize, 02 January 2007 - 11:20 PM.
#11
Posted 03 January 2007 - 12:01 AM
#12
Posted 03 January 2007 - 08:10 PM
I'm off for a checkup at the podiatrist very soon, so I'll get his advice and
then I should be in a position to make an informed decision....
#13
Posted 03 January 2007 - 09:47 PM
depends on where u are in Melbourne - I know that some of The Athlete's Foot stores stock them and other running specialists, but your best bet is to contact Brooks themselves and find out who might stock them in your area - the distributor is Texas Peak - (03) 9338 5099.
hope it helps!
samplesize
#14
Posted 03 January 2007 - 09:56 PM
#15
Posted 03 January 2007 - 11:43 PM
samplesize, on Jan 3 2007, 09:47 PM, said:
depends on where u are in Melbourne - I know that some of The Athlete's Foot stores stock them and other running specialists, but your best bet is to contact Brooks themselves and find out who might stock them in your area - the distributor is Texas Peak - (03) 9338 5099.
hope it helps!
samplesize
#16
Posted 05 January 2007 - 10:55 AM
Been wearing them around work to break them in. Great grip on office carpet
#17
Posted 05 January 2007 - 03:34 PM
Scottie77, on Jan 5 2007, 11:55 AM, said:
Which Rebel Sport store did you go to Scottie? Might have to do the same thing if you come back with a favourable report, although I could use them on Sunday for exactly what you're doing.
#18
Posted 05 January 2007 - 03:44 PM
MikeyBoy, on Jan 4 2007, 02:34 PM, said:
Heya. I went to the one in the City. They had a couple of pairs on special. Depends what size you are. I know they had 11.5 & 12. I grabbed the 12.
Best bet give em a call and see what they have left, save a trip in. They might even have them at Chatswood. Ill try and post a report on Sat afternoon when i get back to civilisation
#19
Posted 05 January 2007 - 05:45 PM
#20
Posted 05 January 2007 - 06:40 PM
#21
Posted 08 January 2007 - 11:35 AM
Plunged through Cox's river and they dried out ok. They are not looking as bright though but thats understandable
How did your training go MikeyBoy?
Great Track. I can see why its so popular
#22
Posted 09 January 2007 - 08:58 PM
Didn't manage to run on Sunday after a blistering run on Saturday as well as the Black Stump on the Monday.
#23
Posted 14 January 2007 - 09:21 AM
#24
Posted 14 January 2007 - 07:25 PM
The only problem with your theory of "we poured an entire bucket of water over the front of them- none got inside" is if you run through watercrossings, (which many of us do), that are so deep they comes up over the top of the shoe and often almost up to your knees( which happens more often than not) you need your shoe to be able to drain it out...this won't happen to shoes you can pour water over the front of and they don't get wet, the water would stay inside it's waterproof coating. You'd end up with squelshy wet wrinkley feet and probably blisters from the poor ventilation and drainage.
With my shoes, after the water gets in, it doesn't take long at all till it's drained out and you feet just feel like a regular humid training run!! Traction is the main issue, for me anyway, than waterproofing.
BTW, almost all my running is in the trails and I've tried the waterproof asics type you've mentioned. What I have stated is my personal experience.
My most favourite trail shoe to date is the Mizuno Wave Ascend..does everything I need it to do and fits just great!!
kazz.
#25
Posted 14 January 2007 - 07:43 PM
After reading threads, Brooks Cascadia seem to be the shoe of choice, but I am also keen on trying on Asics Trabuco. Anyone know where in Sydney you can get them at the right price????
Went and checked out Pauls Warehouse locally and they had no Brooks and Trabuco only in womens. I was ready to do some cross dressing, but they only had up to 11W which did not allow me to get my foot in.
The Hornet
#26
Posted 21 January 2007 - 09:39 PM
#27
Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:33 PM
Whippet Man, on Jan 21 2007, 10:39 PM, said:
Looks like the Cascadia is listed as available at intraining in Qld. According to the site Tugger is the Marketing Manager
33 Park Road, Milton (just opposite the Eiffel Tower)
Phone: 07. 3367 3088
http://www.intrainin...m.au/shoes.html
#28
Posted 21 January 2007 - 10:38 PM
Virtual, on Jan 21 2007, 10:33 PM, said:
33 Park Road, Milton (just opposite the Eiffel Tower)
Phone: 07. 3367 3088
http://www.intrainin...m.au/shoes.html
#29
Posted 22 January 2007 - 08:24 AM
Virtual, on Jan 5 2007, 07:40 PM, said:
Interesting Virtual. I too have been disappointed in my Continental Divides. Done about 300k in them since last Sept and they still are very stiff. Not too bad for a 10-15k rough trail run but anything over 2 hours and my feet are looking for some relief.
I believe Leo Russell's in Melb are looking to stock some Asic Trabuco's this year. Certainly the cheapest Asic's dealer in Melb so I make check them out again soon.
#30
Posted 22 January 2007 - 08:56 AM
#31
Posted 22 January 2007 - 08:59 AM
Whippet Man, on Jan 21 2007, 09:39 PM, said:
There were Cascadias at Rebel Sport Bourke Street last week.
I want some!
#32
Posted 22 January 2007 - 11:53 AM
I've been disappointed in my Cascadias. I found them very stiff and as a result pretty uncomfortable for running on fire trails or anything more packed down than that. They were billed as a shoe that could be used on roads when required (ie running to a trailhead) if need be, but this is not the case. On the really rough stuff they are fine, but I'll be sticking to Asics I think.
#34
Posted 22 January 2007 - 03:40 PM
I bought a pair of NB807s at Sportsco last year during a sale ($70). I wear them when trail running and reckon they do the job OK. It's mostly prety rugged, rocky, stony, loose and dusty trail running that I do - not much water around (especially last few months) so not sure how they'd go in the wet or muddy terrain.
#35
Posted 22 January 2007 - 07:15 PM
tim, on Jan 22 2007, 09:56 AM, said:
Tim, haven't tried the actual trail version but certainly have found the normal Nike Frees to be great on trails, used them in the last month for the Two Bays 56KM fatass, and before that Mount Nebo 50K's as well as my own 40 odd K's at Binna Burra on New Years eve, previously used them at Brindabella and the Feathertop 50 Skyrun and find them really good.
I'd be honest and say i'll have to have a look at the Nike clearence centre reasonably soon as i've got close to 600 K's out of them and they are starting to get a bit ragged (and the damned velcro - which this model has instead of laces is now getting a tendency to undo !).
These are the ones
#36
Posted 22 January 2007 - 07:49 PM
The Humboldts are light, give good grip on the trails (been running mainly on trails in the Blue Mountains, including several times on the Six Foot track as well as many trails in the Blackheath surrounds) and they seem to work on everything. Some of my trail runs involve starting on the road for a short distance and they work on the roads too.
Couldn't ask for anything more really - you don't feel the stones, they have good tread and if they get wet (they are not waterproof), they dry out quickly. Actually, there is one more thing I could ask for and thats a shop to buy my next pair, as the shop I originally bought them from doesn't sell them anymore!!!
#37
Posted 23 January 2007 - 05:47 AM
Interesting to note on the Keen footwear site that if you press Australia on the store locator section it takes you to the New Zealand site (and NZ addresses) only.
Edited by Kelvin, 23 January 2007 - 05:57 AM.
#38
Posted 23 January 2007 - 08:24 AM
#39
Posted 01 February 2007 - 11:26 PM
#40
Posted 02 February 2007 - 09:01 AM
#41
Posted 05 February 2007 - 07:19 AM
#42
Posted 05 February 2007 - 01:04 PM
Ive been out 3 or 4 times now with them all on course at Six Foot, including the recent Megalong FatAss event. I noticed yesterday that the front part of the shoe tread seems to have taken a fair bit of battering. Shredded the little black tread down to the orange if you have ever looked at a pair.
I guess this could be from me braking a fair bit heading back down both Pluvi and Mini. As the trail is pretty rough and rocky. Whats the general wear and tear on a pair of trail shoes like? Or is it sucking the life out of them training on Six Foot
Poor things arnt as bright as they used to be. Any tips for washing? Or leave them be to build up character
#43
Posted 05 February 2007 - 01:20 PM
Scottie77, on Feb 5 2007, 02:04 PM, said:
Scottie,
You will find that your shoes will never be the same again after Six Foot. And neither will you
Forget about washing your shoes. The accumulated blood, grime and dirt is part of the mystique that sets trail runners apart from those that only pound the city pavements
#44
Posted 06 February 2007 - 01:35 PM
You just need to run through a few water crossings occasionally!!
Works for me!!
kazz.
Edited by kazz, 06 February 2007 - 01:36 PM.
#45
Posted 08 February 2007 - 10:36 PM
Not a bad pair of shoes.
#46
Posted 08 February 2007 - 11:14 PM
#47
Posted 09 February 2007 - 04:18 PM
Leo Russell's
24 Gilbert Rd
West Preston
Tel 03 9484 1343
#48
Posted 09 February 2007 - 09:21 PM
#49
Posted 09 February 2007 - 10:18 PM
I took my new Tevas for a spin today. Put in 4 hours on some hilly trail with a good mix of surfaces including technical singletrack, open firetrail, hard packed dirt, hard packed gravel, loose gravel and dirt and stones, steep ups and downs, beach sand, rough and some smooth rock. Pretty much everything except slick granite and mud, but I reckon they would do well in mud with the wide open waffle tread. They handled it all without any trouble. I felt confident on the steeper descents and didn't have any slippage. Straight out of the box they felt good with only a bit of rub on a little toe after a couple of hours. This is because the toe-box is a bit narrow and would limit how far I could wear them: probably only up to 50km. I was surprised how supportive they were for such a light shoe. I would love to wear them through some water to test out their drainage which should be exceptional given the venting. Rating? I am always going to be tough given the comparison will be with my beloved Leonas, which I think are the best trail shoe ever made, and I'd like to put a few kms into them before I draw any conclusions. But they have good potential for shorter trail runs.
#50
Posted 14 February 2007 - 08:56 PM
Mrs. Hornet is not happy.















