"foot-glove" SocksSore Feet
#1
Posted 06 May 2007 - 12:18 PM
This year when I collected my entry pack from the In-Training tent at Southbank on the day before, an attractive young lady from a sock stall gave me a persuasive sales pitch about new running socks, a type of foot-glove, which I had not seen before, and though expensive I decided to take up the offer of 2 pairs for the price of one ($29.95). Though I am usually sceptical about claims of new products, given my problems with over-heating feet and toe blisters I felt it was worth a try.
To my utter delight these socks measured up completely to the young lady's claims - my feet did not over-heat or cause me grief, and I did not suffer one blister. In fact, thanks to the good condition of my feet I was able to continue my normal running routine immediately after the event, where in the past I would have a lay-off for at least a week.
As most experienced runners know, completing a set distance is very much "mind over matter" and for me I only ever wanted to put myself through the pain of a half-marathon once a year. However, thanks largely to the pain-free run two weeks ago, I now plan to do my first Gold Coast Half in July.
I urge any runner with similar problems to mine to get hold of "foot-glove" socks - the ones I purchased are "Injinji" brand Performance Tetrasok and presumably available at "In-Training" and other leading running stores. Check the website: www.injinji.com
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 06 May 2007 - 05:22 PM
Edited by azza, 06 May 2007 - 05:23 PM.
#3
Posted 06 May 2007 - 09:22 PM
#4
Posted 06 May 2007 - 09:56 PM
#5
Posted 09 May 2007 - 07:18 PM
SlowManiac, on May 6 2007, 09:56 PM, said:
An unfortunate choice of words maybe, but no, I have no interests financial or otherwise in either socks, shoes, running apparel, nor running stores. Guess my exuberance got me carried away because these socks most decisively helped my feet over the half-marathon, and I felt it was worthwhile passing this information on to anyone who develops sore feet.
#6
Posted 09 May 2007 - 08:08 PM
SlowManiac, you plugged Al's Gift Shop and Aldi as well - does anyone question your share portfolio every time you post?
If you boys can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. You've impugned the reputation of two CRs without any evidence as casually as you like. Knowing Steve, he has no need to plant a mole to advertise socks like that. And I'll bet Injinji doesn't either.
#7
Posted 09 May 2007 - 08:11 PM
They are comfortable and because each toe is covered seperately you don't get that skin on skin rubbing.
#8
Posted 09 May 2007 - 09:07 PM
Kato, on May 9 2007, 08:08 PM, said:
SlowManiac, you plugged Al's Gift Shop and Aldi as well - does anyone question your share portfolio every time you post?
If you boys can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. You've impugned the reputation of two CRs without any evidence as casually as you like. Knowing Steve, he has no need to plant a mole to advertise socks like that. And I'll bet Injinji doesn't either.
Neither of my so called plugs were first posts. I think we are allowed to be suspicious of the motives of first time posters who promote products. There is nothing to stop StWill from defending his motives. I dont think my attack was particularly malicious and I am sure his reputation is still intact. Geez, Azza just asked if he had any interest - surely nothing wrong with that?
I am unsure who the second CR whose reputation I have impugned is but I apologise as that was not the intention.
#9
Posted 09 May 2007 - 09:20 PM
It is best to check the facts before launching at each other.
#10
Posted 10 May 2007 - 08:57 AM
Kato, on May 9 2007, 08:08 PM, said:
SlowManiac, you plugged Al's Gift Shop and Aldi as well - does anyone question your share portfolio every time you post?
If you boys can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. You've impugned the reputation of two CRs without any evidence as casually as you like. Knowing Steve, he has no need to plant a mole to advertise socks like that. And I'll bet Injinji doesn't either.
I asked a question, and StWill answered (thanks StWill), even acknowledging that the wording was a bit "salesy". StWill's tried the product, liked it, and let us know - great! Asking for clarification is not tarnishing anyone's reputation, it's simply asking for clarification.
#11
Posted 10 May 2007 - 10:19 AM
We get a hell of a lot of first time posters spamming CoolRunning. Most of them get picked up by the Moderators, either when we view them ourselves, or when they post is reported by a CR member. We mostly delete them, or ask them to take out an ad. It isn't a perfect system (remember 'free runs in Sydney' a while back?, and the 'backpain' spam attack a few years ago?).
Seemed like a fair question posted, and it didn't seem offensive to me. They certainly didn't attack StWill personally, just questioned the content. One of the strengths of CR is that it is a very active community that self polices posts. Compare CR to other communities, where the signal-to-noise ratio is much worse.
If you like the socks - great, go and buy them, write about it here.
If you think any post is spam, then report it.
StWill, thanks for your first post, and welcome to CoolRunning.
#12
Posted 10 May 2007 - 06:52 PM
I didn't think Steve Manning (InTraining) needed another kick in the ribs for having a service to provide, and someone saying so. That was my initial interpretation of Azza and SlowManiac's posts.
Sorry Azza and SlowManiac for jumping down your throats.
#13
Posted 10 May 2007 - 10:01 PM
The FACTS:
Injinji were an exhibitor at the Brisbane Marathon Expo which Intraining organised. They were offering a two for one deal at the expo and had an attractive young lady selling them! We do sell them at our shop. They really have little covers for each toe just like a glove.
Perhaps someone else who has used them could comment. I have not run more than 10km in them.
#14
Posted 10 May 2007 - 11:41 PM
Steve, on May 10 2007, 10:01 PM, said:
Have run 35 hours (175km) of technical, stinking hot trail without changing socks in brand new shoes.
Wouldn't use anything else. They don't guarantee blister free feet but they come pretty close.
Didn't comment as I was a bit cynical about the original post.
I have no commercial interest. In anything.
#15
Posted 11 May 2007 - 09:50 PM
Whippet Man, on May 10 2007, 07:41 AM, said:
Have run 35 hours (175km) of technical, stinking hot trail without changing socks in brand new shoes.
Wouldn't use anything else. They don't guarantee blister free feet but they come pretty close.
Didn't comment as I was a bit cynical about the original post.
I have no commercial interest. In anything.
Hey ....I tried the "glove socks" too .I liked them.. Everyting else had aches, pains and cramps but my feet were great..Thanks Kato the sports sheild was great too.
Only hope I can run ,fast,again ....soon
Radar
#16
Posted 11 May 2007 - 10:43 PM
can I buy them without ordering over the net.
Who is selling them in Melbourne ?
#17
Posted 11 May 2007 - 11:21 PM
Rudolf, on May 11 2007, 10:43 PM, said:
can I buy them without ordering over the net.
Who is selling them in Melbourne ?
#18
Posted 12 May 2007 - 11:26 AM
I've found a new use for them as well - when trying on shoes that I want to buy, I often wonder whether my toes feel a little cramped because of the shoe, or because of the socks... and with the Injinji socks, I know it's the shoe.
#19
Posted 12 May 2007 - 03:12 PM
pastyboy, on May 10 2007, 10:19 AM, said:
If you think any post is spam, then report it.
StWill, thanks for your first post, and welcome to CoolRunning.
yup welcome StWill
I have mixed feelings about them but mainly positive - I have a woollen pair and a tek pair bought from USA
I had no blister problems ( and boy do I usually have blister problems after about 4 hours) in the 6 foot track or Gosford 12 hour in Jan - not sure which I used then.
However for various reasons I had considerable problems with the woollen ones as inners for the 24 hours at Coburg - I think the blisters started about hour 13/14 though ( between 80km and 90km walking) and the combination of cold - track under water and a fairly hard track (in my opinion) together with having a hole appear in my normal second skin socks the day before necessitating a different untried outer sock probably did not help at Coburg - nor did the fact I had only about 3 hours wear out of the shoes I was wearing help either.
BUT they are great with thongs!!!!!!!!!!
All the best
David
#20
Posted 16 May 2007 - 05:36 PM
They are definitely the most comfortable socks I have run in – I wore them in the Auckland 24 hour race last year and had no foot problems at all.
Rob
#21
Posted 13 June 2007 - 10:33 PM
#22
Posted 29 June 2007 - 02:45 PM
Craze, on Jun 13 2007, 10:33 PM, said:
Hey Craze,
I'm a huge fan of the Injinji's also, I started wearing them on the advice of my podiatrist who stocks them as I continually had problems with my feet blistering and overheating on long runs. I must say that I was a bit sceptical about them at first as they felt a bit funny when I first put them on. However, after about 5 minutes I didn't know I had them on and it was like being barefoot.
I haven't had any problems with blisters or overheating at all since and I now use them as a liner in my football boots also. As for changing your shoe size, I did not find this a problem as I used to wear Thorlos which are extremely thick. My Podiatrist did say however that as your toes are not constricted together in the Injinji's like they are in normal socks, your toes are able to spread and take their natural positioning within the shoe. If you have bought tight or narrow shoes, you may find that your toes new found freedom may be an issue.
Give em a go and good luck.
#23
Posted 01 July 2007 - 09:19 PM
#24
Posted 02 July 2007 - 01:28 PM
#25
Posted 02 July 2007 - 06:32 PM
Edited by tank girl, 02 July 2007 - 06:32 PM.
#26
Posted 02 July 2007 - 06:38 PM
i wouldn't mind trying them but the cost of shipping is prohibitive
#27
Posted 05 July 2007 - 02:41 PM
Vurt, on Jul 2 2007, 06:38 PM, said:
i wouldn't mind trying them but the cost of shipping is prohibitive
Had a good look at their website as per Taz and I can't see anywhere where they claim that the socks will make you run faster! I don't think any company would be stupid enough to make that sort of statement... Except maybe Nathan hand bottles.... I agree, great product.
All I can say is that I have not got one blister anywhere since I've been wearing Injinji's, you may need to look at your shoe sizing Taz.
Vurt, I get mine from my podiatrist but I'm in Brissie. My brother is in Sydney and he was saying he found them at Trek & Travel in Kent Street the other day, not sure what style he bought. I also google searched and you can get them online at www.area51.net.au . Failing that, I would just send them an email.
Socks are an individual thing and I'm sure Injinji's wont suit everyone but they're number one in my book.
Mitch.
#28
Posted 14 January 2008 - 01:07 PM
#29
Posted 14 January 2008 - 07:57 PM
#30
Posted 14 January 2008 - 08:59 PM
#31
Posted 15 January 2008 - 11:00 AM
They are definatley worth the money though.
Cheers
#32
Posted 16 January 2008 - 08:31 PM
#33
Posted 16 January 2008 - 09:30 PM
#34
Posted 16 January 2008 - 09:42 PM
#35
Posted 16 January 2008 - 10:25 PM
RunBare, on Jan 16 2008, 09:42 PM, said:
Not unless your 5s were on the verge of beeing too tight. The injinjis are thin and stretchy, measuring half the length of your foot before you put them on. The flex points and stretch in them is good because once they're on there is no tightness, lumpyness or uneven pressure. For a marathon or ultra a couple of fresh pairs in your camelback would be luxury.
Glad the sprints are doing the biz Runbare, roll on March and the KSOs!
#36
Posted 18 January 2008 - 09:38 AM
Shoesandsox, on Jan 16 2008, 08:31 PM, said:
I did the Math on this a few weeks ago and by the time you paid the shipping and converted to AUD (Even with the good EX-Rate at the moment), they worked out to be cheaper here. Plus you have to wait a while to get them and I suppose when it comes down to it I would prefer to support the Aussie economy. Price wise Thorlo's are $12 in the states also but retail here for over $30, so it must have something to do with duties or something...
#37
Posted 28 January 2008 - 09:53 AM
#38
Posted 03 February 2008 - 11:06 AM
Cheers
Robbo
#39
Posted 10 March 2008 - 05:54 AM
I like the idea but at 30 bucks a pop (locally) and that they only lasted a handful of runs, i don't know if i could justify buying another pair.
#40
Posted 10 March 2008 - 12:02 PM
I would be interested in getting more details on your experience with the sock, drop me a line at info@injinji.com.au
Team Injinji.
Vurt, on Mar 10 2008, 05:54 AM, said:
I like the idea but at 30 bucks a pop (locally) and that they only lasted a handful of runs, i don't know if i could justify buying another pair.
#41
Posted 10 March 2008 - 05:03 PM
#42
Posted 10 March 2008 - 05:11 PM
#44
Posted 23 April 2008 - 11:15 PM
#45
Posted 24 April 2008 - 08:11 AM
#46
Posted 24 April 2008 - 10:06 AM
Edited by allrounder, 24 April 2008 - 03:09 PM.
#47
Posted 24 April 2008 - 11:16 AM
Sheff - i used the coolmax ones, but then i do shorter stuff, not sure what the ultra dudes use.
#48
Posted 24 April 2008 - 06:14 PM
Jo
#49
Posted 28 April 2008 - 05:19 PM
Joey74, on Apr 24 2008, 06:14 PM, said:
Jo
Ordered another three more pairs immediately and rotate them on my high milege trail runs.
Have to be the biggest advance in gear I have experienced in a long time
#50
Posted 04 May 2008 - 01:16 PM
I prefer thin socks honestly, but for those finding them a bit too thin perhaps another thin regular sock over the top would help? I often do this with normal socks as it's best for avoiding blisters IMO - swore by it when I used to walk long bush trails in NZ, no blisters even with sweaty, river-wet feet.
Can get these online? Otherwise I might pick some up in Brissy when down for the Doomben 10,000...














