Beep Test Questions: Sorry If This Is Repetitive!
#1
Posted 18 May 2007 - 03:20 PM
I have some very specific questions about the Beep Test. I need to be able to get to level 7 in a month's time, so I tried it the other day and only got to level 3.2 (I realise this is bad).
Then I go on the internet, and people keep saying things like ' you can practically walk to level 5, even with no fitness' and things like that.
I did the test on a netball court, over 2 thirds of it. The version of the test I have has a man stating the levels, and he seems to be Australian. I don't know what i'm doing wrong, as if you can 'practically walk' the first 5 levels, I should have been fine!
I'm not the fittest person in the world, but also not the most unfit. I am, however, not really a runner (and never have been) but would have thought the Beep Test wouldn't have caused that much trouble for me!
Any help would be much appreciated! And if anyone has any ideas what i'm doing wrong, all help will be taken on board! Thanks!
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 18 May 2007 - 07:02 PM
I have done a couple of beep tests in my time and to be able to walk to level 5 is not correct. With proper training and I'm sure people from CR will respond with help in this area you should be able to reach level 7.
Both my kids did beep tests in year 7 and found it tough but could reach around level 5. I would just make sure your distance is right.
Good Luck.
#3
Posted 19 May 2007 - 08:43 AM
#4
Posted 19 May 2007 - 02:21 PM
That turning advice is awesome, so thanks for that tank girl!
And to the author of the previous message (sorry, didn't check your username) thanks for reassuring me! I think the problem is that there are a few variations of the test, and also some people remember doing it in school, when who knows what distance the teachers were making them run it over? I'll give it another go tomorrow, and see how I go then. Thanks again!
#5
Posted 20 May 2007 - 05:52 PM
Is it possible for you to contact who it is that your doing the Beep Test for?
Possibly they could help with the correct version of the test. Also, I do know some Personal Trainers can assist in helping people get to certain levels. You might have to ring around if you take that option.
Hope that also helps.
#6
Posted 20 May 2007 - 06:38 PM
#7
Posted 21 May 2007 - 10:50 AM
wombatoutofhell, on May 20 2007, 06:38 PM, said:
I've started seeing a trainer, so thanks for that!
It's used by a lot of different agencies (ie the army, police force) to show levels of fitness. It's not the world's greatest indicator, in my opinion, as it involves a lot of stopping and turning (would much rather they say, run this distance in this time).
#8
Posted 21 May 2007 - 12:23 PM
beep tests I have participated in have the athlete only touching 1 foot over the 20m line. this would make a big difference to the example mentioned by "tank girl".
Also take a look at this calculator (http://news.bbc.co.u...tml/default.stm) and put 400m, 800m, 200m, 5000m PB's etc in and you get a HUGE variance in results.
What would be your preferred test to gauge someone's expected VO2 max without the use of laboratory equipment??
#9
Posted 21 May 2007 - 02:08 PM
The first time I did a Beep Test with the RAAF it was like having your lungs pulled out thru your nostrils by tweezers lol.
I can't do the speed stuff give me long distance anytime. Slow and Steady always wins the race......
#10
Posted 22 May 2007 - 10:50 PM
I believe there are around 3 different levels of BEEP TEST (Beginner, Intermediate and Advanced), as i have experienced the same thing you mentioned.
On one i could walk to 6 at quite a comfortable pace, but on another was running steadily at at 4.
My PTI (Army) confirmed this as well.
I would find out what version you will be tested using - and train on that one if possible.
On the turns as others have mentioned - you need only foot fully across the line.
I do it by getting to the line and turning just as the beep sounds.
As you start to get tired - if you can - sprint the first 6-8 mts off the line and use the pace to coast to line, turn, and go again.
Using this method i can achieve a higher level myself and have helped a couple of people through it for entrance physicals for fire brigade.
Best of luck with it - I really hope you achieve what you need.
Tim
#11
Posted 27 February 2008 - 11:47 PM
#12
Posted 28 February 2008 - 09:45 AM
jacinta, on May 18 2007, 04:20 PM, said:
I have some very specific questions about the Beep Test. I need to be able to get to level 7 in a month's time, so I tried it the other day and only got to level 3.2 (I realise this is bad).
Then I go on the internet, and people keep saying things like ' you can practically walk to level 5, even with no fitness' and things like that.
I did the test on a netball court, over 2 thirds of it. The version of the test I have has a man stating the levels, and he seems to be Australian. I don't know what i'm doing wrong, as if you can 'practically walk' the first 5 levels, I should have been fine!
I'm not the fittest person in the world, but also not the most unfit. I am, however, not really a runner (and never have been) but would have thought the Beep Test wouldn't have caused that much trouble for me!
Any help would be much appreciated! And if anyone has any ideas what i'm doing wrong, all help will be taken on board! Thanks!
#13
Posted 28 February 2008 - 09:54 AM
Technique will help during the test but you do need reasonable fitness, practising the test will help you to pace yourself and thus conserve a bit of energy, obviously it will also give you confidence.
Most of all be patient, get your fitness up and the results will happen.
#14
Posted 28 February 2008 - 09:59 AM
wombatoutofhell, on May 20 2007, 06:38 PM, said:
Hey wombat
As has been said, the beep test is used by a lot of places as a general fitness indicator. I've got a mate who plays squash - he uses it as a part of his training to check his fitness level, change, etc. It's used by employers - for example the fire department needs something like a 7 or 8 on the Aussie beep test as an employment requirement. Same idea for defense forces etc. There's an American version as well, I'm not sure how many but I'd imagine there's an official Aussie one. Anyway the point...
The reason the beep test is used as an indicator is that it's a good indicator of all round fitness. As a runner you'll know that it takes a very different type of fitness to sprint 100 or 200m than it does to run 15ks. As the levels on the beep test increase, you go from walking through light jogging, to a steady run, and eventually you end up sprinting as the time between beeps decreases. If your endurance is lacking, you'll drop out early. If your strength and power is lacking, you'll drop out early. But with moderate strength and endurance, you can get a good score.
For a runner, the beep test isn't that useful, but I guess it'll tell you if your strength is at a higher level than your endurance or vice versa, so it could help you adjust training patterns accordingly.
Sorry about the long winded description! someone else (i'm thinking Rudolf) will probably be able to tell you what it's about in much greater detail, but that's the gist of it.
#15
Posted 28 February 2008 - 11:30 AM
Good Luck
#16
Posted 29 February 2008 - 03:06 PM
I can only get to 8.6
My 5km time is 22:30:00
If that is a help
#17
Posted 02 March 2008 - 05:20 PM
jacinta, on May 18 2007, 04:20 PM, said:
Sorry, I realise this original post was some time ago but the man you refer to, if it is a genuine beep test CD is non other than Rob de Castella! I agree that he is 'the man'.
As for the test, like most tests, it indicates a level of fitness but is suited to particular sports. AFL players tend to do very well. In my experience tennis players also do well. Some league players get to 14 or 15. There is another test called the YOYO but I'm not sure how it works (an easier form of Beep test??)
As BigAdam said, if you want to get good at the Beep Test you need to practise the beep test.
#18
Posted 03 March 2008 - 11:10 PM
#19
Posted 04 March 2008 - 07:18 PM
Ross...
#20
Posted 04 March 2008 - 09:45 PM
I don't think this test is great indicator of VO2 max like someone suggested because you aren't running hard enough for long enough. Maybe it might be an indicator of VO2max for sedentry people but not trained athletes like myself.I believe if you had two highly trained athletes with similar 3km times there may be differences in results.
I believe if you want to measure your VO2max or VO2max pace you should run for 9-11 minutes around a athletic track this will give you the precise information you want and this will give you running potential over 5 and 10km.
In 2003 I ran 13.2 for the beep test two weeks after setting my 10km best of 33:54. I am not sure that 13.2 is that great as I heard some runners that can run level 16 that would struggle to run 10km in under 40 minutes.
Edited by Chelli, 04 March 2008 - 10:10 PM.
#21
Posted 05 March 2008 - 09:29 PM
Quote
http://www.defence.g...obs/fitness.htm
or this one is a mp3 file
http://orgs.jmu.edu/strength/MP3s/Beeptest..._directions.htm
#22
Posted 06 March 2008 - 06:31 AM
ratdog, on Mar 5 2008, 12:29 PM, said:
not sure how to do the quote thingy refering to who's quote it was
http://www.defence.g...obs/fitness.htm
or this one is a mp3 file
http://orgs.jmu.edu/strength/MP3s/Beeptest..._directions.htm
Thanks for these excellent links ratdog. Will put the mp3 on the ipod and give it a go on the weekend for a bit of fun. I also found this smaller mp3 sized Canadian version
http://rapidshare.co...l_beep_test.wma
Edited by Buncha, 06 March 2008 - 07:39 AM.
#23
Posted 18 September 2008 - 09:40 AM
Just a quick question, did the beep test this morning using my ipod and a court at the gym,
I got level 14:11 and it wasn't that difficult. I was kind of disappointed, I am reasonably fit but not super fit by any means and reading the posts usually only super fit people get these results.
Is there a chance I have a beep test that is easier or goes slower? Oh and with the 20m line, do both feet have to go over or is 1 acceptable? Maybe thats where i was gaining time?














