Best Bike Training For A Runner
#1
Posted 15 June 2007 - 08:49 PM
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 16 June 2007 - 01:44 AM
I'm in the same boat as you. Done an achilles and an ankle (same leg).
Bike riding is all I can do. So I will be interested in the responses also.
I ride every second day. Between 30 minutes and an hour on my mountain bike. I need to do a longer ride like yourself, not 80+ I would have to build up to that.
I can now ride at an average of 19kph on the mountain bike. That is good for me. I try to throw some faster work and also push up the occasional hill.
This has helped me maintain some sort of fitness.
So I think doing what you suggested mixing it up will help you (and me)when you/we get back to running.
Good luck
thomo
#3
Posted 16 June 2007 - 04:40 PM
My bike is a hybrid and so I can managed 24 - 25Km/hr on longer rides and quicker on the short stuff. The road bikes still fly past me. Managed over 600Km in May and happy with my fitness.
Also doing heaps of leg exercises including heel raises and drops on a step with 8Kg in a backpack (3 sets of 30 three times a day). The Achilles have never been so strong.
Seeing the physio this week and hopefull of cranking up the jogging sessions.
I'm interested in what others do on the bike as cross training. I've just applied my running program to the bike and lengthened the time spent on the bike. I was told to multipy the distance/time by 2.9 to get a rough comparrison. Did a tri the other week - 21K bike; 3.2K jog and walk; and stopped for a haircut
Hope your injury improves.
#4
Posted 18 June 2007 - 08:53 AM
#5
Posted 18 June 2007 - 09:08 AM
was doing a longish ride of 90km.
shorter one and a half hour rides, and two velodrome sessions per week. eg. 2km hard, 1km float repeat 7 times.
ran a 36;45 10km off that training.
#6
Posted 18 June 2007 - 09:14 AM
a typical week would have been.
mon- rest
tues- 40km with 5x2km hard efforts
wed- rest
thurs- 40km with 3x5km hard efforts
fri- rest
sat- 80- 100km easy
sun 50-60km easy/steady.
i believe the interval work on the bike helped me maintain some running fittness
when i started running again i didnt have too much trouble getting back up to speed again.
regards chonky
#7
Posted 18 June 2007 - 10:29 AM
If you are doing only cycling and nothing else (not rohan), then expect the quads to suffer a little bit especially on downhills, though strong on uphills.
Running uses eccentric loading on the quads- braking in otherwords, or slowing the straightening of leg against a force. Pushing the pedals strengthens the opposite, which is required for hill running- so there is an imbalance or weakening of the eccentric contractions.
I did bugger all running for 4 wks prior to the Two Oceans ultra. Aerobically etc I was able to run 3hr mara pace still, and was even stronger than usual on hills. But my quads were hurting from about 10km in after the first long gradual downhill. By the end, after two mountain passes, it was absolutely screaming.
The way to counter this somewhat, is to pedal by pulling as well as pushing all the time, which works the glutes in a running motion, and kind of acts as weight training on legs- or even do some actual weight training.
cheers
#8
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:07 AM
Do heart rate zones translate across from running to cycling so working in the same zone on the bike will be equivalent to doing so whilst running?
#9
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:11 AM
moby, on Jun 18 2007, 01:07 AM, said:
can't give you the specifics.
#10
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:14 AM
As for bike, I think, if it is issue of crosstraing, that slower the bike the better = heavy MTB with fat tires and have them bit soft, so the bike requires consyttant attention of peddaling forces and never rides for free (unless down hill)..
Long rides should go by times, since it really depends on the bike, eg Rohan 90 km on road racers could take the same time and effort as 30-45-60 or whatever kms on slow bike.
Because legs not suffering, the bike lets You easyly to go over 2-3 hours, so occasional 5-6 hours rides could be usefull
If it really 6 hours of pedalling, no downhills, stopping time etc.
#11
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:21 AM
rohan, on Jun 18 2007, 11:11 AM, said:
can't give you the specifics.
Runners have huge 'aerobic engines' and 'weak driveshafts'. In other words you will find that as a runner crossing to cycling your legs will hurt and limit your effort way before your HR goes ballistic. Once your legs catch up with training you should be able to do sessions or periods in a ride where the HR acn be put in a similar zone to running- it takes time though.
#12
Posted 18 June 2007 - 11:33 AM
So the HR max the max achiecvable for swimmers is lower than sitting cyclist and lower than standing up runners, and this transfers all across the HR zones.
Try it with HR rest.
#13
Posted 18 June 2007 - 02:27 PM
Colin, on Jun 18 2007, 10:29 AM, said:
If you are doing only cycling and nothing else (not rohan), then expect the quads to suffer a little bit especially on downhills, though strong on uphills.
Running uses eccentric loading on the quads- braking in otherwords, or slowing the straightening of leg against a force. Pushing the pedals strengthens the opposite, which is required for hill running- so there is an imbalance or weakening of the eccentric contractions.
I did bugger all running for 4 wks prior to the Two Oceans ultra. Aerobically etc I was able to run 3hr mara pace still, and was even stronger than usual on hills. But my quads were hurting from about 10km in after the first long gradual downhill. By the end, after two mountain passes, it was absolutely screaming.
The way to counter this somewhat, is to pedal by pulling as well as pushing all the time, which works the glutes in a running motion, and kind of acts as weight training on legs- or even do some actual weight training.
cheers
Hi Colin,
I'm interested in this too, as I also have achilles tendonitis, and while usually it hurts at the beginning of a run, within a couple of K the tendon warms up and the pain goes away, but sometimes it just feels too much of an ache and I usually start walking.
If I could replicate some form of running fitness on a bike it would be good, but I'm limited to gym bikes, so, my question is after a lengthy intro, can the same be done on a gym bike? in terms of training to substitute a run? if so, what's the best way? a long bike session, or intervals on the bike, or spin classes etc?
I already do weights generally so strength's not an issue.
Cheers.
#14
Posted 18 June 2007 - 02:57 PM
Firstly, if its a recent achilles injury (not a chronic one) then I would definitely limit the ankle movement and strap the foot in a way that the achilles remains unstretched (toes down).
Regarding cycling then for cross training and keeping running economy, I would;
Use lower gears rather than higher and spin at faster cadence against lower resistance.
Use a pulling technique as well as pushing -you have to think while doing it, sub conciously you will revert to just pushing. This strengthens glutes, and also keeps the 'economical' knee lift action.[ One reason why cyclists tend to shuffle a bit more- they don't have this economical action].
It also strengthens the eccentric loading ability a tad - well nothing like actually running, but limits the losses.
Long bike sessions at constant cadence need to be almost twice as long (time)as equiv run.
Interval sessions, spinning say two min on one min off are very useful in getting the HR up.
cheers
Edited by Colin, 18 June 2007 - 02:58 PM.
#15
Posted 18 June 2007 - 03:27 PM
#16
Posted 18 June 2007 - 04:18 PM
Colin, on Jun 18 2007, 02:57 PM, said:
Firstly, if its a recent achilles injury (not a chronic one) then I would definitely limit the ankle movement and strap the foot in a way that the achilles remains unstretched (toes down).
Regarding cycling then for cross training and keeping running economy, I would;
Use lower gears rather than higher and spin at faster cadence against lower resistance.
Use a pulling technique as well as pushing -you have to think while doing it, sub conciously you will revert to just pushing. This strengthens glutes, and also keeps the 'economical' knee lift action.[ One reason why cyclists tend to shuffle a bit more- they don't have this economical action].
It also strengthens the eccentric loading ability a tad - well nothing like actually running, but limits the losses.
Long bike sessions at constant cadence need to be almost twice as long (time)as equiv run.
Interval sessions, spinning say two min on one min off are very useful in getting the HR up.
cheers
Thanks Colin, I'll try this out this week. (the injury is about 2 years old, have orthotics now, have had massage, acupuncture, ice, deep heat, faith healing,...you name it i've tried it. Now I just have to manage it!)
#17
Posted 18 June 2007 - 08:52 PM
Thanks for the information provided guys. I've been mainly interested in keeping the HR up as the bike has been for maintaining fitness while not running. I'm likely to do 2 sessions on the bike when back running - maybe one longish ride and one tempo type bike ride.
I did 3.2K of 600 m jog and 200 m brisk walk repeats tonight with no heel discomfort and seeing the physio tomorrow.
#18
Posted 18 June 2007 - 10:09 PM
Colin, on Jun 18 2007, 11:21 AM, said:
Yeah, so I've already found. I'm having to kill myself to get my heart rate up.
#20
Posted 19 June 2007 - 01:00 AM
#21
Posted 19 June 2007 - 01:56 PM
I have an exercise bike (ergometer) that i bought a few weeks ago.
Never been a cyclist as my area is too hilly for biking!(though i love to run them!)
The bike has
HRM control program
Wattage control program
Hill Climbing
Intervals...
you name it
I am still experimenting and at the moment for the first 5 sessions i have set it to HRM control ie
i set it to 100bpm and if my heart rate goes below it increases the difficulty (at 110bpm) and at 90bpm it reduces the difficulty.Normal max. is 200bpm and resting is 45ish when i last checked.
Sessions are 30mins atm and i am covering 16-17km at 100+ watts (which doesn't mean much to me) this session isn't over strenuous and just carrying on my initial experimentation.
I try to keep my cadence as measured to 90 RPM (which is easy)
I am cycling to add variety to my training and because i can do it more being at home with wife and kids.
Really i want to get back to full fitness and break my pre six foot 5km PB of 18:54 and go on to sub 60 C2S!
So what can i do to increase my running ability (including the pulling on the pedals)?
Bit of rambling so i hope you get the picture,
Cheers R2B
#22
Posted 20 June 2007 - 11:05 PM
Anyway, long story short, I went to Japan after three months with no running and managed to finish respectably. At that time my PB was 89mins and I finished in 94mins. Aerobic fitness had suffered - I got an awful stitch during it, but other than that, I didn't think it was too bad for such a long time without a run.
#23
Posted 07 April 2008 - 08:32 AM
I am currently injured with PF. I can cycle (I have a hybrid bike) but walking/running is still painful. I came across this thread and was wondering if anyone can add anything more.
My preferred running distance is the 10k to 1/2 Marathon range.
How long should a 'long' session on the bike be?
Any other recommended sessions?
Any helpful weblinks?
Also, once people have recommenced running again, what sort of cross training do they do on the bike? Long sessions or speed type sessions?
Thanks.
Cazz
#24
Posted 08 April 2008 - 02:07 PM
Rudolf, on Jun 17 2007, 07:14 PM, said:
Long rides should go by times, since it really depends on the bike, eg Rohan 90 km on road racers could take the same time and effort as 30-45-60 or whatever kms on slow bike.
Rudolf why do the top MTB racers do a lot of their aerobic training on road bikes? I think they mainly do sport-specific stuff (technical trail riding skills) on their mountain bikes, and long distances on roads to get the miles in their legs. Part of the reason may be that it's much more enjoyable to do 90km on a good road bike, than to do 30km on a heavy bike with soft tyres. Training should be fun!
#25
Posted 09 April 2008 - 12:54 PM
If you use a road bike , you can stay out for hours (if that is what you want) but IMO the transfer is not as great.
Whatever you do needs to be mimicing the running action as much as possible - using the same muscles as running and in as similar a way as possible.
I would be working up to being able to spend as much time as I could standing on the pedals and pushing.
I know a few mt runners who do reps up a nearby mt on their MTB as cross training.
Edited by southy, 09 April 2008 - 01:12 PM.
#26
Posted 09 April 2008 - 03:41 PM
If you have a leg injury it's probably best not to run or use the legs in the same way as you would in running. While cycling is not going to be perfect in maintaining your peak running fitness, it will at least keep you partially aerobically fit.
The best cross-training for an injured runner is deep water running.
I'd also question the benefits of the mtb climbing repetitions, because they are going to be having a nice rest on the way down - equivalent in running intervals to stopping between the efforts rather than jogging.















