Treadmill Vs Track
#1
Posted 25 August 2007 - 04:25 PM
I am training for the Melbourne Marathon and found that I recover from my speedwork quicker if I use the treadmill, with less chance of injury. Also I find it easier to maintain a consistent fast interval pace.
Do you think there is the same training value as on the track?
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 27 August 2007 - 12:26 AM
The big downside is not being exposed to the elements, or as Captain Obvious might say "races aren't run on treadmills". Another problem might when you are dragged along at a quicker pace for the duration of an interval, enabling you to tough it out at a faster speed where you'd normally be slowing down when the ground isn't moving from under you outdoors.
Aside from this, I quite enjoy belting out reps with a window open, the fan on, the Ipod blaring and no headwinds or dirty crosswinds. Overall, however, and particularly with the improvement in the weather, Track > Treadmill.
As long you're doing your big k's and recovery work outdoors (the weather in Melb's been too good not to) you'll be fine.
What sort of reps are you doing for the 'thon? Mine are 4 to 5 x 2K with 45-50 sec rest (+ w/u & c/d of 15 min. each) and 6 x 500 of fast stuff with about 75-80 floating recovery.
#3
Posted 27 August 2007 - 09:25 AM
as well as the reasons already stated..
all things being equal, good to recreate real life conditions but the 99% of us who don't have coaches, i would have thought the tready is good way to "force" yourself to work a bit harder than you might otherwise left to your devices..
i was gutted yesterday when i was running for my 10k prep on the tready (first time done anything on the tready for months).. looking good, working hard 7 minutes to go and then it just dies on me.. stops dead.. when i told the girl at the front desk of the gym she shrugged and said "yeah.. happens all the time.. i'll come fix it in a minute"
not happy
#4
Posted 27 August 2007 - 09:26 AM
Hips start to play up a little on the road, as the treadmill was more cushioned. But I would say over 10km, you are 2km better off on the road than the treadmill.
TBS
#5
Posted 27 August 2007 - 01:04 PM
#6 Guest_Carmen_*
Posted 27 August 2007 - 01:33 PM
brizza, on Aug 27 2007, 01:04 PM, said:
#7
Posted 27 August 2007 - 01:38 PM
#8
Posted 27 August 2007 - 01:39 PM
brizza, on Aug 27 2007, 01:04 PM, said:
But I also agree that the experience on the treadmill isn't the equal of the experience of running outdoors on roads, tracks, etc.
#9
Posted 27 August 2007 - 03:05 PM
brizza, on Aug 26 2007, 09:04 PM, said:
If there was no forward effort you would fall off the back of the treadmill. However, for a variety of reasons it is mechanically different and less onerous than running outside.
Edited by MaxMTC, 27 August 2007 - 03:19 PM.
#10
Posted 27 August 2007 - 03:11 PM
#11
Posted 27 August 2007 - 03:17 PM
DrJH, on Aug 27 2007, 03:11 PM, said:
#12
Posted 27 August 2007 - 03:34 PM
#13
Posted 27 August 2007 - 03:39 PM
#14
Posted 27 August 2007 - 04:02 PM
brizza, on Aug 26 2007, 11:34 PM, said:
not upset at all
Edited by MaxMTC, 27 August 2007 - 04:03 PM.
#15
Posted 27 August 2007 - 04:31 PM
#16
Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:09 PM
Quote
A treadmill at my gym goes up to 23km/h 2.36 per km. I've done a few interval sessions on the treadmill when i was being too much of a coward to go out in the pouring rain. I've done 5x1km with 2min rec in 2.36, even on a synthetic track i'd be smashing myself to keep the same session under 3min km's. I also did a session 20x400 on 2min cycle (57sec recovery) in 63sec very comfortably, on a synthetic track i think i could do the same for maybe 6 - 8 reps before collapsing. So for DrJH and others quicker than me it would not be anywhere near fast enough, but i've seen others try 23km/h and fall off the back in the 1st 100m, ie before it even reaches 23km/h.
Treadmill running can be good for a recovery session and possible benefits for practising increased cadence, also can be good for self assessing biomechanics if you have a mirror in front...well that's how i justify it to myself when i'm hiding inside from the elements. But, it's not running, it's just lifting your legs.
Sorry Kev, it's a waste of time and only slightly harder than sitting on the lounge.
#17
Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:30 PM
brizza, on Aug 27 2007, 01:04 PM, said:
I seem to sweat on the tread mil everytime i use it at the gym and i get my heart rate going at a good pace.I wouldnt take the klms done as gospel on the treamill tho as brixxa siad the machine is doing all the work for you
#18
Posted 27 August 2007 - 07:47 PM
#19
Posted 27 August 2007 - 08:19 PM
Easy Tiger, on Aug 27 2007, 07:09 PM, said:
I'm trying to train my way through a foot problem at the moment so I've been looking at the possibility of some treadmill action. I'd assumed that you're right Easy Tiger and that running a given speed on treadmill would be significantly less hard than running that speed on the road or track but it would be interesting to have a more precise idea of the relationship. For instance, how fast do you need to run on a treadmill to expend the same energy that you would expend on the road running 20 kph?
If and when I get my hands on one I'll look into this. They flog a 22 kph one on ebay fairly cheaply I notice but I can't find one to hire that gets above 16 kph. I don't want to go to the gym to do my runs!
Kev, I'm sure there is some benefit to be derived from treadmill training but speedwork I'd venture is something that needs to be done the old fashioned way!
Edited by victoralias, 27 August 2007 - 08:20 PM.
#20
Posted 27 August 2007 - 09:27 PM
I've always assumed that heart rate was reasonably correlated with calorie usage, this may not be correct?
At any rate, there seems to be reasonable anecdotal evidence from people training exclusively on treadmills, who then going on to run solid road marathons to suggest that Brizza might be exaggerating his scientific observations.
Besides (spoken in jest) it was the 80s sports scientists that pushed carbo depletion on the jogging world - are we ready to trust them again yet?
#21
Posted 28 August 2007 - 07:29 AM
I've done over a dozen 1/2 marathons, and sometimes my speed work was on the treadmill. It worked for me. Not as well as on an outside track, but it can work. Depends what you want to achieve; finish or PB.
#22
Posted 28 August 2007 - 09:01 AM
I still like to do the odd treadmill run in the gym as my pre-weights warmup but I'm much happier running in the fresh air.
Linda
#23
Posted 28 August 2007 - 09:08 AM
My preference is the track 100% of the time but sometimes it just isn't that easy.
#24
Posted 28 August 2007 - 12:41 PM
Just very happy I could still train and reach some goals.
#25
Posted 28 August 2007 - 01:09 PM
#26
Posted 28 August 2007 - 01:38 PM
sook54, on Aug 28 2007, 09:01 AM, said:
Thats fascinating Linda. I REALLY need to know for myself what the story is now. I bet this is peculiar to my analytical bent of mind, but I wonder if anyone here has compared their heart rate at a given speed on a treadmill to their heart rate at this speed on the track or road? (Measuring your speed off the treadmill can prove difficult I know.) This is going to be one of the first tests I do and the key variable really. All things being equal, if the rates are the same then a treadmill workout should be no less difficult and in many ways no less productive... I may yet be wrong, but my expectation is that -at least in my case- it will prove easier to run on the treadmill.
Edited by victoralias, 28 August 2007 - 01:41 PM.
#27
Posted 28 August 2007 - 04:16 PM
#28
Posted 28 August 2007 - 04:53 PM
#29
Posted 29 August 2007 - 11:05 AM
Yes - it can be mind-numbingly boring!! The sessions I do on the treadmill are always intervals or tempo runs where I change the pace every few minutes.
The benefit is
1. I can do a hard run at night safely
2. It does feel a little easier on the legs
3. My leg turnover and heartrate on a treadmill is always higher than what it is for me to run the same pace out on the road - so my next road run always feels easier, or I feel like to can go faster.
Thankfully we have tvs at the gym in front of the treadmills so you can stick on the headphones and watch something other than the seconds and distance tick away!
#30
Posted 29 August 2007 - 12:38 PM
I read somewhere that it is always a good idea to set the treadmill on a 1 degree incline to get a similar benefit to a road workout.
Personally I find it more difficult to train on the treadmill and I have to work myself harder relative to what I would on the road. My running action just doesn't feel the same. I'm never really comfortable and have difficulty getting any kind of rythym. I have no idea about the scientific conclusions but from my own observations I feel that my running action on the treadmill is more upwards and my motion is being jerked backwards. On the road I feel that I have a more flowing and forward momentum.
Overall, I couldn't do the mileage I need to without a treadmill and it is an invaluable tool, especially in the winter months where the days are much shorter. However, it can never replace an outdoors run. After getting back on the road after a treadmill session, I certainly appreciate the more natural experience and being amongst the elements.
#31
Posted 04 September 2007 - 02:13 PM
One comment I will make is that 5 weeks out from my 3rd marathon, and aged 49, I am finding that using the treadmill once a week after a long run, allows me to workout without agravating any soreness remaining from the long run.
Previously I could only do 3 runs a week, Sunday long (25 - 32) Wednesday Med (12 - 15) and Friday short (10km). Using the treadmill I can squeeze in a fourth run, normally on the Tuesday, so even if the value is not the same as the track, it must be better than a rest day.
Thanks again
#32
Posted 04 September 2007 - 10:11 PM
I recently read a report on one of the British national runners most hated training sessions which involves 7x3mins on the treadmill starting at 15km per hour pace and going up to 21km per hour with very short recovery. When that's done a 10minute break before jumping back on and running at 19km per hour pace with the treadmill incline increased by one percent each minute, running to exhaustion where he runs up to about a 10-12 elevation, where pace then drops to about 6min per km pace. While not a great fan of treadmill, I do use them from time to time. Like running on the road, its all relative, you can do both easy or as hard as you want. I think some of the sceptics should try the session outlined a go and see if thats easy or not. Keep up your training, you sound like youre doing ok. Just crank up the pace on the treadmill gradually and enjoy.
#33
Posted 05 September 2007 - 05:43 AM
Yum
#34
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:48 AM
Also, I tried to do a 2hr 10min long run and the treadmill just stopped dead after 100min simply because it didn't have 5 digits for the time!
#35
Posted 05 September 2007 - 06:07 PM
#36
Posted 06 September 2007 - 01:37 PM
#37
Posted 06 September 2007 - 02:07 PM
brizza, on Sep 6 2007, 01:37 PM, said:
I couldn't agree more, but.........
There is a place for everything, and in a heavy program, where it is not always possible to drown in the wonders of nature, I think the treadmill has its place, as a supplement to the REAL running world.
After the drudgery of a treadmill session the next outdoor run will only seem better.
#38
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:03 PM
Kev, on Sep 6 2007, 02:07 PM, said:
There is a place for everything, and in a heavy program, where it is not always possible to drown in the wonders of nature, I think the treadmill has its place, as a supplement to the REAL running world.
After the drudgery of a treadmill session the next outdoor run will only seem better.
#39
Posted 06 September 2007 - 03:25 PM
#40
Posted 06 September 2007 - 05:02 PM
Speedy Girl, on Sep 6 2007, 03:25 PM, said:
#41
Posted 06 September 2007 - 07:14 PM
benefits and limitations for both, suits some people better than others etc etc
hey.. it might not be the perfect training but it's gotta be better than none, right?
#42
Posted 06 September 2007 - 10:10 PM
deadcat, on Sep 6 2007, 05:14 PM, said:
benefits and limitations for both, suits some people better than others etc etc
hey.. it might not be the perfect training but it's gotta be better than none, right?
If my boys (1 & 3yrs) could just keep up with me running outdoors, no problem!
I really love doing a tempo run in the gym as it forces me too run harder than I often would if out on the road. I also do speed intervals and have cut my 10k time by 10 minutes in 6 months. As others have mentioned I also run faster on the road than on the tready.
I love running outdoors for all the reasons mentioned, but I love to run full stop and if the only chance to do so is in the gym then so be it.
#43
Posted 07 September 2007 - 03:34 AM
#44
Posted 07 September 2007 - 12:13 PM
oh, and i recommend the book too
#45
Posted 09 September 2007 - 09:39 PM
#46
Posted 09 September 2007 - 10:49 PM
Kev, on Aug 25 2007, 12:25 AM, said:
I am training for the Melbourne Marathon and found that I recover from my speedwork quicker if I use the treadmill, with less chance of injury. Also I find it easier to maintain a consistent fast interval pace.
Do you think there is the same training value as on the track?
Hi Kev I have found in the past that a treadmill session while better than nothing does not give as good training effect as running across the ground.
I think the treadmill makes it easier for you, and if you think about it there is a big difference between running on a surface that isn't moving compared to one that is.
That is from a leg standpoint. From the cardio side, a treadmill obviously does give your heart a good workout, but no more so than actual running along the ground.
Cheers,
Mars
#47
Posted 10 September 2007 - 12:51 PM
Whilse Mars makes the comment that a "treadmill obviously does give your heart a good workout, but no more so than actual running along the ground." Well that also depends on how quickly your actually running on the ground and if it's a jog then it could be argued that the benefits would not be any much better at all. Basically its all relative to the intensity one puts into it over the other.
Cheers and Good luck in Melbourne.
#48
Posted 23 April 2009 - 10:54 PM
serena
#49
Posted 23 April 2009 - 11:36 PM
serena, on Apr 23 2009, 10:54 PM, said:
I have setup in garage next to window, fan and usually watch a DVD or listen to music. I don't have easy access to a track, flat ground, or a garmin, so I use it for 1km intervals with 500m recovery (warm up for 2km first, then do 6-8 sets of these). Just recently I started doing some Marathon Pace work where I set at constant speed and hold for 60-90 minutes.
The tready certainly gets heart rate and breathing going like the real thing, but unless you are doing just for fitness I would still recommend doing the real thing as well.
#50
Posted 24 April 2009 - 07:56 AM
Treadmills vary enormously in their speed readings. They're not at all accurate.














