2016 Olympics
#1
Posted 06 September 2007 - 01:41 PM
From memory other candidates are - Japan (Tokyo), Brazil (Rio), Spain ?, one of the middleeast City ???, ...and
Chicago for USA.
The comment was since the 2008 is asia and 2012 europe (OK not real one, but still counts), assumption was there is little chance for Praque or other european candidate, and Japan also seems dubious after China.
It was suggested that america should be next logical place, the comment completely disregarded Brazil and was putting Chicago as clear favorite
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 07 September 2007 - 01:55 PM
Nothing against the USA, but they have probably had more than their fair share of hosting the OG, but then again, with the money it costs to put them on, they are probably one of the few countries that can afford it.
I can't remember any South American country ever having hosted the Olympics, (I believe Mexico is geographically classified as North America), likewise Africa haven't done so either, although I'm not sure how many African nations would be able to afford the infrastructure (which may be Abuja's downfall for the Comm games bid for 2014).
I think that if they went to Rio, this would be the first time that the Southern Hemisphere have hosted the games outside of the 2 in Australia.
#4
Posted 07 September 2007 - 05:38 PM
later this year 5 canditates will be selected, they would have to prepare all teh proposal etc, and the first half of 2008
the selection process will hapen.
#5
Posted 08 September 2007 - 08:10 AM
Dom, on Sep 7 2007, 08:05 AM, said:
2012 europe (OK not real one, but still counts)
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
I consider the UK part of Europe, London is closer to France than Scotland. But island mentality is still strong over here, a lot of people are anti-EU and as far as they're concerned the continent may as well be somewhere in the south Pacific. In other words, plenty of Poms would agree with Rudolf on that matter.
Spain had the Games in '92, but plenty of Catalans would argue that they're not part of Spain
South America surely are due a go by now. Wasn't Buenos Aires the main rival to Melbourne for the '56 games? It's been a long wait though. Europe and the USA have had quite a few Olympics but I guess a lot of the money to hold a Games and the existing stadia etc to use are there and not so much in other places. 2016 will have been 20 years since North America last had the Summer games; it was only 12 between LA and Atlanta. Europe hasn't had consecutive summer Olympics since '52.
It's probably not too far off to have the Olymics in the Middle East, eg Dubai. Seems to be plenty of money there, and also an urge to show it off to the rest of the world.
#6
Posted 08 September 2007 - 10:14 AM
15 sep is cut off date to lodge prelimanary interst to organize intent.
beginning of 2008 is the time to lodge official application with $100,000 deposit
during 2008 5 candidates will be choosen.
october 2009 is the voting time to select the winner
so far these cities have lodged the indication of interest :
Doha - Qatar
Chicago - USA
Madrid - Spain
Praque - Czech
Rio - Brasil
Tokyo - Japan
will edit if more cities come up till 15/9
#7
Posted 08 September 2007 - 11:49 AM
#8
Posted 08 September 2007 - 01:46 PM
Cape Town lost narrowly to Athens for 2004 remember, but I suspect they will wait until 2010 Soccer WC, so perhaps lodge for 2020. Most of the Stadia will be in place anyway.
#9
Posted 10 September 2007 - 06:48 PM
clanrunner, on Sep 7 2007, 07:10 AM, said:
clanrunner, on Sep 7 2007, 07:10 AM, said:
Twopennys, on Sep 7 2007, 10:49 AM, said:
Chicago or Rio, then.
OTOH, in 2016 the most lucrative TV market may well be in Asia (China, India), not the US.
Yeti
#10
Posted 10 September 2007 - 07:37 PM
These days the commercial imperative outweighs things like 'continents that are due', so I think Rio is a long shot...
As a voting bloc, Asia and Africa are the largest, but Japan is not popular with most of Asia, and African nations are more interested in attracting investment from bid cities than sharing the hosting duties around, so I don't think they will use their numbers parochially (plus there are no African nations bidd...
Given anti-American sentiments, I think Chicago is also a long shot (the 2012 New York bid got nowhere).
With London getting 2012, I think Seville and Prague are behind the eight-ball...
Doha might be the sleeper...
#11
Posted 13 September 2007 - 10:32 AM
I think Chicago has a good bid, supported by their stadiums and the lake at their doorstep.
Although continental location doesn't play much of a part in determining the successful bids if Chicago gets 2016, i think we will see Cape Town or Durban put in a strong bid for 2020 (an African city will get soon enough) and Brisbane will have to try their hand at 2024 (could go to europe if south africa get 2020) or 2028.
#12
Posted 13 September 2007 - 11:32 AM
#13
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:55 PM
#15
Posted 23 June 2009 - 08:21 PM
Hopefully, I'll be attending myself as a guide runner in the Paralympics. That would be awesome.
#16
Posted 23 June 2009 - 11:08 PM
HMMMM what event would i do, syncronised swimming looks so cool
#17
Posted 24 June 2009 - 06:27 AM
simply in new finacial reality of the old world, they are not wasting any more money
on anything olympics organizing related
#19
Posted 03 October 2009 - 11:53 AM
#21
Posted 03 October 2009 - 12:00 PM
The world is regaining sanity, the rotten civilization is over.
The clear buttkick to Chicago in first round is the best signal the Universe could have delivered to confirm the changeover of civilizations.
There are 2 stories, Chicago and Rio, both having strong implications.
What is worth noting is the hysterical reaction of some australian and some other media to Chicago kick as well as completely primitive reaction of the australian olympic representative to it.
This shows that the sport power structures in this country needs more urgent clean up, than those in South Africa.
Last games of rotten civilization based on crime, violence and deception are symbolicaly at the city of evil nest during the year of end of Mayan calendar.
The first games of new civilization are in Brazil-Rio.
It can get any more symbolic than this.
And on the other note - perhap the Rio games as the first one of the new era could also restore the old games tradition - naked, nude or at least topless
and free from sport power structures and from countries medal counting.
Edited by walker1st, 03 October 2009 - 12:02 PM.
#22
Posted 03 October 2009 - 01:06 PM
obviously, you've never been to Rio then.
And no, it's not like the Brazilians to be hugely nationalistic when it comes to sport. I mean, it's not like they're obsessed with their national football team or anything.
#23
Posted 04 October 2009 - 09:04 AM
#24
Posted 04 October 2009 - 09:14 AM
DontStop, on Oct 3 2009, 02:06 PM, said:
perhaps you understood my post as the organizing country is counting the medal tally.
I was refering to decades old olympic war, where the countries are fighting each other and political systems are fighting each other via olympics medal tally, countries spend huge amount of money to
manufacture medals, to buy medals, they award citizenships for medals, they support various state run steroid insitutes, and there is plenty of incidents of fraud and hoax just to get medal for any case.
This is usualy comming from governement pressure and is administered via sport bodies. It is seldom just the cheating by individual athlete.
This part has nothing to do which country does organize the games, last example was recent T&F Berlin championship - SA to get medal for any case.
What I am saying is, than the 2016 have the chance to be first games to be at least partialy free
from the medal war, as the fact of Chicago kickout and Rio win signals new era
#25
Posted 04 October 2009 - 10:11 AM
What a stupid, facile thing to say. What, because Mr and Mrs Obama fronted they should stay in?
#26
Posted 04 October 2009 - 11:00 AM
Roy Masters made the point on ABC's Offsiders that the Chicago bid was the only one not underwritten by its respective government. No wonder the IOC baulked at their bid.















