readytorun, on Apr 23 2008, 10:15 PM, said:
My knees hurt just a little at the start but were fine once I was warmed up. My ankles hurt a bit but I think that is just getting used to the new shoes.
Hi readytorun,
If you continue to experience knee &/or ankle pain then it would be wise to get a biomechanical assessment performed to address any underlying movement related problem which the footwear may not be able to address effectively. Make sure however, you don't do too much (running) too soon & possibly work on some Quadracep exercises.
The above advice was given out of genuine concern of a fellow runners problems which I have some experience with - not because I am keen to flog something

.
batavia, on Apr 24 2008, 11:33 AM, said:
While generaly all true, remember podiatrists can be selling somthing also. Some can seem rather overaly keen to flog inserts.
I am not aware of any of the Podiatrists (about four) on this forum which have been "overly keen to flog inserts" - in fact quite the contrary.
I am a Podiatrist, with no affiliation with a shoe store, a particular brand or a shoe model. Having said this I (personally) do love my Nike Free 3.0's

.
The main reason for posting on this topic is because I had a patient come to me earlier this week wearing an old pair of Brooks Addiction (from Athlete's Foot) & recently brought a new pair (of Addictions') from Athlete's Foot because he was told they were the most suitable for him. It was noticeable straight away that he had a neutral foot type with mild out phase pronation whilst walking & running. I told him the shoe he was wearing wasn't suitable for him & that he needed to get a shoe in the neutral-mild overpronation category. He then told me that the Athletes Foot considers the Brooks Addiction to be a neutral shoe. I subsequently advised him on the various characteristics (& gimmicks) which contribute to a particular model being more suitable to a particular foot or gait type. The following day he gave me a call whilst in the store to say he was again told that the Brooks Addiction was a neutral shoe - I told him it wasn't & niether does Brooks (
http://www.runhappy....ast_detail.html ) consider the model to be neutral (after all, they should know). He ended up getting a different shoe based on the characteristics I advised him on - & no, he didn't receive any "inserts".
I don't recommend a particular brand or model when advising on footwear for quite few reasons which I won't go into now i.e. one individual may find that a Nike neutral shoe feels better for him/her than an Asics neutral shoe. I advise on the characteristics they need to look out for when buying a shoe & subsequently the category the shoe falls into i.e. neutral, stability or motion control - however there can be different terminology used when referring to 'stability' & 'motion control' shoes.
Being a tad skeptical I made a visit the Athlete's Foot store in question & sure enough, there was the Brooks Addiction as well as other 'control' or 'stability' models with the 'neutral' tag underneath

. The salespeople were busy with customers so I couldn't bring this up with them at the time. I also couldn't help but hear the advise that was given to one of the customers & thought to myself that the staff needed more training.
This has been my experience with one Athlete's Foot store (suburb withheld).