Which Ring Of A Standard Olympic Track Is 400m?
#1
Posted 25 May 2009 - 12:34 PM
But now wondering which of the rings is actually 400M?
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 25 May 2009 - 12:48 PM
#3
Posted 25 May 2009 - 04:24 PM
RodN, on May 25 2009, 12:34 PM, said:
But now wondering which of the rings is actually 400M?
The others are right. That's why lane 1 starts at the finish line (for 400m), then lane 2 is a little bit ahead of them, the lane 3 a little bit more ahead etc. (and also why in the longer races the competitors are all able to move to the centre after the first part of the lap)...
#4
Posted 25 May 2009 - 04:48 PM
If it is grass track inside a football field and not a synthetic athletics track it may not be correct .
Best to name the track, that way the people from that area or who use it can confirm.
Edited by thomo, 25 May 2009 - 04:50 PM.
#5
Posted 25 May 2009 - 06:32 PM
#7
Posted 25 May 2009 - 08:06 PM
mgi11a, on May 25 2009, 06:32 PM, said:
I was talking to our local running guru about this sort of stuff a couple of weeks ago and he's a bit of an authourity on these issues and said to me that the 400m is measured 20 centimetres from the rail of the inside lane and also i'm pretty sure he said when they measure a marathon course it has to be a metre from from the curb or gutter or was that 2 metres maybe Brick could verify that for me
#8
Posted 25 May 2009 - 08:11 PM
Some grass athletic tracks have an inside dummy lane that is less than 400M so that the casual joggers that use it can wear that one out rather than the one used for middle distance and distance races.
#9
Posted 25 May 2009 - 09:17 PM
#10
Posted 25 May 2009 - 10:51 PM
wozzam, on May 25 2009, 03:06 AM, said:
I was talking to our local running guru about this sort of stuff a couple of weeks ago and he's a bit of an authourity on these issues and said to me that the 400m is measured 20 centimetres from the rail of the inside lane and also i'm pretty sure he said when they measure a marathon course it has to be a metre from from the curb or gutter or was that 2 metres maybe Brick could verify that for me
This sounds pretty right ... not sure of the distance from the rail of the inside lane, but many years ago I saw a track surveyor verifying a track for record ratification purposes (200m record I think). He was running a string some distance outside of the inside line of the lane the runner ran in. Anyway, there is a black and white answer to this ... where are our certified course measurers/surveyors ?
R2L
#11
Posted 25 May 2009 - 11:59 PM
#12
Posted 27 May 2009 - 01:07 AM
RULE 160
Track Measurements
1. The length of a standard running track shall be 400m. It shall
consist of two parallel straights and two bends whose radii shall be
equal. The inside of the track shall be bordered by a kerb of suitable
material, approximately 5cm in height and minimum 5cm in width. ...
.........
2. The measurement shall be taken 30cm outward from the kerb or,
where no kerb exists, 20cm from the line marking the inside of the
track.
http://www.iaaf.org/mm/Document/Competitio...rinted_8986.pdf
So ... assuming that Lane 1 has an inside kerb, the measurement of Lane 1 is taken 0.30 metres outward from that kerb and the lengths of the other lanes are measured 0.20 metres from the line marking the inside of the lane.
The logic seems to be that an athlete will generally run closer to a line marking than to a kerb.
So ... if you run close enough to the kerb in Lane 1, it seems like you could run less than the nominal race distance ... especially in say a 10,000m race.
R2L
#13
Posted 27 May 2009 - 10:48 AM
Running2Long, on May 25 2009, 10:51 PM, said:
R2L
Now, whilst it may seem that it is possible to run short by running on the line or against the curb, try it sometime. You only need to step wide once or twice and you would then be running longer! As soon as you pass someone you have run off the measured line and you have to get back on it.
#14
Posted 27 May 2009 - 05:32 PM
M12, on May 25 2009, 11:59 PM, said:
Also depends on which bit of your body you measure from. Swing your right arm widely and it's probably covering a good 401m.
#15
Posted 27 May 2009 - 11:58 PM
RodN, on May 25 2009, 12:17 PM, said:
#16
Posted 28 May 2009 - 12:23 PM
#17
Posted 28 May 2009 - 12:51 PM
Action, on May 27 2009, 10:48 AM, said:
Now, whilst it may seem that it is possible to run short by running on the line or against the curb, try it sometime. You only need to step wide once or twice and you would then be running longer! As soon as you pass someone you have run off the measured line and you have to get back on it.
From IAAF, no I am not from the IAAF.
Quote
inside lane (lane 1) will, therefore, have a length of 400.001m along its theoretical line of
running.
http://www2.iaaf.org/TheSport/Technical/Tr...ementReport.pdf
Cost to certify a track for Olympic /world championship is currently US$ 10,000.
#18
Posted 28 May 2009 - 08:43 PM
lactatehead, on May 28 2009, 03:23 AM, said:
If you're not too bothered about getting it exactly right, you could just step it out. I've done this before for 800m reps. 800s are a lot easier to measure though!
#19
Posted 28 May 2009 - 09:46 PM
lactatehead, on May 28 2009, 03:23 AM, said:
great for figuring how many laps in which lane achieves what distance.
(race walking sites are actually good for something)
#20
Posted 28 May 2009 - 10:42 PM
rohan, on May 28 2009, 09:46 PM, said:
great for figuring how many laps in which lane achieves what distance.
(race walking sites are actually good for something)
#21
Posted 29 May 2009 - 12:22 PM
The following spreadsheet tells the distance in each lane per lap, and for multiple laps and calculates your target pace for any given speed such as 20sec per 100m (that's 80sec per 400m).
#22
Posted 29 May 2009 - 01:15 PM















