Change Of Schedule To Wmg Sydney Athletics Programbest check your events!
#1
Posted 16 September 2009 - 09:04 AM
That's over 50% of your female middle distance & distance runners affected by this 'minor' change.
I booked my accommodation based on the draft schedule, and planned my training over the last 3 months for the events that I targeted. I paid a $ 220 registration fee and about $1000 in accommodation costs to compete at these Games. This is really poor organisation in my opinion.
I can not see myself ever competing in another Games event if this is the way they treat their competitors. I will target other competitions instead.
I expected minor changes to the draft schedule but these are major changes. I realise they are overwhelmed with entries but why not start earlier or finish later in the day?
Anyone competing best check the schedule & complain very loudly if you are affected.
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 16 September 2009 - 10:18 AM
#3
Posted 16 September 2009 - 12:37 PM
I can't believe they are waiting til 2pm to start an 8k cc race in Sydney in October. Doesn't seem to be a lot of concern for the competitors here. Why not start the cc races early in the day, esecially for the older age groups?
#4
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:14 PM
One of my training partners (also 50-54 category) was on the waitlist for the 1500m, she told me this morn they'd just contacted her and she's now in. She signed up for & was accepted in the x-country weeks ago.
#5
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:23 PM
#6
Posted 16 September 2009 - 01:29 PM
Ditto Tesso - no likelihood of reaching 1500m finals
#8
Posted 16 September 2009 - 06:10 PM
rachinaus, on Sep 16 2009, 01:29 PM, said:
Ditto Tesso - no likelihood of reaching 1500m finals
Where is the HM on the program??? I simply cannot find it!
#11
Posted 17 September 2009 - 09:00 AM
#13
Posted 17 September 2009 - 09:35 AM
#15
Posted 17 September 2009 - 09:48 AM
We apologise for the inconvenience caused but there is simply no way we can attempt to create a final schedule without clashes. We hope you can appreciate with over 9000 events, some are inevitable.
Kind regards,
IMO , changing the days of the events is a major change, not a minor change. They changed the date of the event by 5 days! YOu don't have to be a genius to suspect that women who do the 1500m will probably also want to do the cc race.
#16
Posted 17 September 2009 - 04:35 PM
The 10k is 2 x 5k laps. The 300 Women are starting 15 mins after the 550 Men. Therefore, the front of the men will catch up to the back of the womens pack before 1k. It could be "interesting".
The other one is that a couple of the 5000m track finals have 50+ entrants, and another handful have 30+. Can you fit that many on the track at once? Should be more interesting moments!
I don't envy the organisers. 9,000 entrants across a dozen age groups and many many events. A real nightmare. Full marks to them!
#17
Posted 17 September 2009 - 05:19 PM
#18
Posted 17 September 2009 - 06:28 PM
Action, on Sep 17 2009, 04:35 PM, said:
18min/km ?
Action, on Sep 17 2009, 04:35 PM, said:
That's what the $1.98M in entry fees is for isn't it?
Edited by Colin, 17 September 2009 - 06:28 PM.
#21
Posted 17 September 2009 - 07:46 PM
You would think they would start earlier in the day and run say 2 age groups at a time. Or at least run completly seperate mens & womens fields. I read the women do 1 X 2k, then 2X 3k. That will be insanity keeping the fileds running different routes but on the course at the same time.
As to the 5k many of them have 2 times schedules, they will have a faster heat & a slower heat, with both being timed finals. My age group has one 5k race starting at 8:00 and the second one at 8:30. There are 34 listed enries.
But the 1500m for my age group has 25 entries, with 14 of them also registered in the cc race.
With this schedule clash, they won't need the heats of the 1500m.
Under IAAF rules, if you enter the heats and qualify for the next round but don't compete in the next round, you can be disqualified from any further competition. Not sure if the same rules apply to Masters Comp.
I will have to withdraw from the 1500m, as I really love cc. For 220 $, you would think I could do 3 events.
With the men , the clash is between the 800s & CC race. Not quite as bad as the clash between the 1500m & CC.
Edited by southy, 17 September 2009 - 07:51 PM.
#22
Posted 17 September 2009 - 08:30 PM
Action, on Sep 17 2009, 07:27 PM, said:
Would have been obvious had I read correctly. For some reason I read that women were starting 15min 'before' men
Probably still hadn't recovered from all that 'reds' I had last night
#23
Posted 17 September 2009 - 09:14 PM
southy, on Sep 17 2009, 07:46 PM, said:
I will have to withdraw from the 1500m, as I really love cc. For 220 $, you would think I could do 3 events.
#24
Posted 17 September 2009 - 09:17 PM
Colin, on Sep 17 2009, 08:30 PM, said:
Probably still hadn't recovered from all that 'reds' I had last night
#25
Posted 18 September 2009 - 08:37 AM
#26
Posted 18 September 2009 - 08:48 AM
Solace, on Sep 16 2009, 05:08 PM, said:
Thanks for that.
I would suggest that it would be better for everyone that it is at that time if not even earlier, it is likely that the temperature in October at say 9.00 would be prohibitive to holding a 21km event where there are runners who will be taking 3 plus hours.
#27
Posted 18 September 2009 - 08:57 AM
HillsAths1, on Sep 18 2009, 08:48 AM, said:
..but aren't these 'world class' runners?
#28
Posted 18 September 2009 - 09:01 AM
5.12 Failure to Participate
Athletes may be excluded from participation in all further events in the competition, including
relays, in cases where:
1. They confirmed for an event, but fail to participate
2. Have qualified in heats, qualifying rounds etc for further participation in an
event but then failed to participate further in that event
3. Failed to compete honestly with bona fide effort.
So yes, if you enter the heats and qualify for the finals , you have to compete in the finals.
Also Action - it seems that the men are doing teh same cousre as teh women in cc - 8k. A 2k lap followed by 2X3k. Probably means all 850 competitors on the course at one time.
No specific schedule though, only a 2:00 start it says. You must pick up your transponder the previous day.
And yes, it is a World Masters Championships but we are still dealing with Masters aged athletes , some of which can be very old and everyone, especially the organising committee has a 'duty of care' to look after them. If someone drops out from heat exhaustion it is sad for everyone, and very bad publicity for the Games organising committee. In Masters Sports, the emphasis is always supposed to be on participation , that's why there are no entry qualification specifications - everyone is welcome to come & compete. It's not just about the elite.
Edited by southy, 18 September 2009 - 09:35 AM.
#29
Posted 18 September 2009 - 09:43 AM
southy, on Sep 18 2009, 09:01 AM, said:
I didn't mean it so seriously Southy...just a dig at the words "World Champs".
The real reason why there are no entry qual specs are that if there were,and to the same relative standards as other bona fide WC, then the fields would be very, very,very small...and how much money can a commercial organisation (which it is) then make from it.
I don't have any problem with them holding the comp...its great for participation...but why not call it what it is...or would that not market the event so well to participants....obviously not
#30
Posted 18 September 2009 - 09:58 AM
It's just annoying that ANSW seems to take it so seriously too and seem to be trying to make it into an elite open mens & womens World Athletics Championships. Masters competition is suppose to be about participation and enjoyment. It seems like ANSW (the committee organising the athletics component in my understanding) has lost the plot.
850 competitors on the course at one time in the hottest part of the day is insanity. Hopefully, that will not happen.
#31
Posted 18 September 2009 - 10:02 AM
HillsAths1, on Sep 18 2009, 08:48 AM, said:
Yeah, that's true. I didn't think of that.
#32
Posted 18 September 2009 - 10:39 AM
southy, on Sep 18 2009, 08:37 AM, said:
the only info I have on the CC is the entry list. 569 entrants, 382 M and 197 W. The race I was describing with 2 laps of 5k above is the 10k road at Olympic Park. I think you have the course for that?
#33
Posted 18 September 2009 - 11:22 AM
Edited by southy, 18 September 2009 - 11:23 AM.
#34
Posted 18 September 2009 - 11:27 AM
southy, on Sep 16 2009, 09:04 AM, said:
That's over 50% of your female middle distance & distance runners affected by this 'minor' change.
Anyone competing best check the schedule & complain very loudly if you are affected.
The obvious answer is to move the cc to Wednesday.
#35
Posted 18 September 2009 - 11:47 AM
southy, on Sep 18 2009, 11:22 AM, said:
BTW, aren't the World Masters Championships and World Masters Games two separate events? Champs for the elites, Games for the rest? Unsure...
#36
Posted 18 September 2009 - 12:06 PM
I pointed out to them that this clash affects 60% of the entries in the female 1500m runners. My age group alone has 14 of the 25 entries in the 1500m also registered in the cc race.
But they give me the same copy & pasted reply, word for word, about minor clashes are inevitable.
#37
Posted 27 September 2009 - 06:45 PM
She complained about the 2pm start as well, the hottest part of the day. Comon sense would say to have at least 2 starts ( a male & female start) & start it earlier in the day? Its bad enough someone like me, 152 cm & 53 yrs old having to try to hold my own in a start with men but impossible for someone her age (70+). I went to the WM Champs in Brisbane & they managed to have 4 starts which was sensible.















