Hoka One OnesGimmick or innovation?
#1
Posted 18 April 2011 - 11:56 PM
So full and frank disclosure: these shoes were given to me. But rest assured my review will be equally full and frank. And with the the barefoot revolution taking off these shoes are heading in completely the opposite direction. Add to that Spud in my ear as he follows Kuprikas trend to shave as much weight and whittle his shoes down as close to barefoot as possible and I am really keen to see how these babies shape up. I took them out for their first test ride today and I have to say: wow! I don't mind winding it up a bit on the odd downhill but these beasts simply fly. I could not believe the ride. They do take a bit of getting used to and I have a couple of issues with the fitting but I now know why they are rapidly gaining popularity in the US with those shirking the trend and looking for max cushion instead of minimal. I plan to really put them to the sword and feedback on how I find them but so far they have my attention!
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 19 April 2011 - 08:08 AM
What do they weigh, can you midfoot strike in them, do they drain well and more importantly how often do you roll your ankle in these shoes.
I have read reports of complete detachment from the trail and therefore delayed reaction to awkward footing etc?
Look forward to your unbiased review Whippet.
Also tell us about the Merrell trail gloves, now there's a shoe at the other end of the runnning shoe spectrum.
#3
Posted 19 April 2011 - 11:51 AM
When it comes to minimising muscle damage from long road ultras I think these definitely may have their place.
I will do a long run (50k)soon at a set intensity in my normal road shoes, then re-do the run when fresh about two weeks later in the Hokas and report back on any perceived differences.
Looking forward to the report in TrailRunner Mag.
#4
Posted 19 April 2011 - 11:26 PM
negsplit, on 19 April 2011 - 11:51 AM, said:
I actually commented to mrs whippet tonight while running that I think the road version would be ideal for long road ultras. In fact I went so far as to say that if I ever did C2K again this is the shoe I would wear. I am getting ahead of myself: I have to put a lot more miles into them first.
Quote
And yes, I also picked up a pair of these to test drive but I will discuss them over on the barefoot related threads and similarly review in more detail in the mag. Talk about apples and oranges, you could hardly get 2 more different shoes.
#5
Posted 20 April 2011 - 09:04 AM
Where do we fall under? Is Hoka under the same price bracket as Newton or even the over-priced ASICS?
With so much discussion re: local vs Overseas(online) pricing, where does the shoe stand?
Even if its a great shoe, with no support (of local purchase) it will soon cause more strain on the Aus Distributor than delight
#6
Posted 20 April 2011 - 09:13 AM
#7
Posted 20 April 2011 - 10:25 AM
By using an EVA 30% softer and increasing its total volume to 2.5 times that of a typical trail running shoe, we allow for more cushioning than any other shoe on the market today, dissipating up to 80% of the shock associated with heal striking when running.
Could be I'm spending too much time marking essays at the moment, but it's disturbing that a shoe manufacturer can't spell "heel". It reduces my confidence, rightly or wrongly, in everything else they do. And it winds me up.
Look forward to your reviews Andy - you're a great writer and I trust your judgment.
Cheers
Sue
#8
Posted 20 April 2011 - 11:40 AM
#9
Posted 08 May 2011 - 02:06 PM
#10
Posted 08 May 2011 - 06:45 PM
Spud, on 19 April 2011 - 08:08 AM, said:
What do they weigh, can you midfoot strike in them, do they drain well and more importantly how often do you roll your ankle in these shoes.
I have read reports of complete detachment from the trail and therefore delayed reaction to awkward footing etc?
Look forward to your unbiased review Whippet.
Also tell us about the Merrell trail gloves, now there's a shoe at the other end of the runnning shoe spectrum.
Edited by Jimmy4990, 08 May 2011 - 06:56 PM.
#11
Posted 08 May 2011 - 11:01 PM
Re the stability: I was surprised how stable they were. Because you sit quite low within the deep footbed the surrounding EVA works to support your foot. They actually have only 4mm of heel to toe drop so suit the mid-forefoot strike. I was also surprised how responsive and nimble they could be. Definitely not ideally suited to tight technical trail but as soon as the path opens up so does the pace. And the downhill performance is unbelievable. I have submitted my full review to the Trail Runner Aus/NZ editor and it was much longer than requested. But given the quirkiness of these puppies he has consented to run the full version.
#12
Posted 09 May 2011 - 07:38 AM
Whippet Man, on 08 May 2011 - 11:01 PM, said:
Re the stability: I was surprised how stable they were. Because you sit quite low within the deep footbed the surrounding EVA works to support your foot. They actually have only 4mm of heel to toe drop so suit the mid-forefoot strike. I was also surprised how responsive and nimble they could be. Definitely not ideally suited to tight technical trail but as soon as the path opens up so does the pace. And the downhill performance is unbelievable. I have submitted my full review to the Trail Runner Aus/NZ editor and it was much longer than requested. But given the quirkiness of these puppies he has consented to run the full version.
#13
Posted 09 May 2011 - 08:32 PM
Thx,
C
#14
Posted 09 May 2011 - 08:45 PM
yochris77, on 09 May 2011 - 08:32 PM, said:
Thx,
C
#15
Posted 19 May 2011 - 10:18 PM
Edited by Jimmy4990, 16 June 2011 - 08:48 PM.
#16
Posted 21 June 2011 - 08:51 PM
Reason for edit: Just realised they don't do bigger than US12.5 and I'm a US14! Oh well. They emailed me to say they may do bigger sizes in 2012/2013. Looks like I'm stuck with 'normal' shoes!
Edited by Mylandra, 21 June 2011 - 09:41 PM.
#17
Posted 22 June 2011 - 09:44 PM
#18
Posted 14 July 2011 - 12:59 AM
Hoka Australia are contactable here through Twitter @HokaAU and I think there's a link to their website there. Now that people are actually getting on-the-ground feedback some Sydney stores have got them on the shelves despite their being funny-looking. There's a bit to get used to and I haven't tried the trail version, but the road is really something unexpected. Haven't tested it as thoroughly as Negsplit but on the back of a 10km p.b. that hurt everywhere except my legs (still slow but going the right way) and a 70km packed trail run that was confusing because it still left me moody for 3 days, just that my quads and hips weren't sore, thumbs up. Montrail Rogue Racers & Brooks Racer ST 5s are still in the training mix, but I'm thinking everything from half-marathon and up for me with these now. Anything long enough to really go looking for a groove or hard enough to fatigue through impact.
From crewing C2K and feeling that it's a shoe that's quite happy rolling up a hill as rolling down it, I'd 2nd Whippet's (I think it was you, Whippet) thought that they're a race and a shoe that'd get along pretty well.
Trying the Bondi, you probably need to size a half up. Apparently not so the Mafate (trail version). I'm going to start writing annoying emails to Hoka in France and US asking when size US13+ Mafate and US13 1/2+ Bondi's are going to happen. Hobbits have to get in line for now, basically.
#19
Posted 17 July 2011 - 11:14 AM
Hoka review at http://runeatsleeprun.wordpress.com
if it's not against policy to share information in the forums.
#20
Posted 17 July 2011 - 11:19 AM
Quote
That's majorly annoying. I too am a Sasquatch and was counting on Hokas getting bigger sooner. Emailing them's probably the best thing you can do. The more they're convinced there's a market at the big end of Foot Town the sooner that'll hopefully happen. The Bondi B's go up to US13 but because they size small they fit like a 12.5. You can milk almost an extra half-size out of them but you'd need an extra 1.5 and that's sandal country. : (
Edited by Dirty, 17 July 2011 - 11:19 AM.
#21
Posted 18 July 2011 - 11:51 PM
Dirty, on 14 July 2011 - 12:59 AM, said:
From crewing C2K and feeling that it's a shoe that's quite happy rolling up a hill as rolling down it, I'd 2nd Whippet's (I think it was you, Whippet) thought that they're a race and a shoe that'd get along pretty well.
Yep I definitely think the Hokas were made for a race like C2K. I haven't tried the Bondi Bs but I know Karl Meltzer prefers them so I am still keen to try them out. I have a fit compatibility issue with my Mafates which may not be an issue in the Bondis. And I notice Diana Finkel won Hardrock in Hokas again the other week. Seems they are well suited to big climbs as well as big descents. Not sure if she wore the Mafates or Bondi Bs.
Also just realised haven't linked the review that prompted this thread originally (although I have posted the link elsewhere). The Trail Run Mag Aus/NZ first edition is available for free download here.
Edited by Whippet Man, 19 July 2011 - 06:57 AM.
#22
Posted 19 July 2011 - 11:11 AM
Because of the structure of the shoe, there is a strong promotion fore foot strike (and also more forward lean) - I too noticed there is a lot more "bounce" inbetween strides, thus allowing me to extend the stride length. It sure feels nice for the Road version to be used on Road, though I will remain a skeptic of the road version on Trail (though Karl Meltzer will beg to defer)
The Hoka feels like one of those gears where you can just pick up and 'Go' with minimal adjustment period.
I am hoping to pick up a pair and give them a nice go, hopefully before M7 next week. Will the "don't try new gear in a race" mistake be evident in the short 42km run? Watch this space..
And yup - It would be an awesome C2K shoe! And it's in a C2K colour combo too!!
#23
Posted 19 July 2011 - 03:34 PM
buzzlightyear, on 19 July 2011 - 11:11 AM, said:
It sure feels nice for the Road version to be used on Road, though I will remain a skeptic of the road version on Trail (though Karl Meltzer will beg to defer)
Hey Buzz great that you had a 'run' in them. Re the road version on the trail, I think they get away with it because of the incredible surface area. This provides greater traction than you would expect. And the deep midsole soaks up any imperfections improving grip and protecting the foot from stone bruises. Quite the opposite to the minimalists but as you pointed out they still work well for mid-forefoot striking. I still doubt the suitability on technical trail but others seem to have no problem with that so perhaps I just need to give that some time. Unlike you at the M7! Hope you get some Bondi Bs and have a blast.
#24
Posted 19 July 2011 - 05:43 PM
I may lose my crew if I didn't give these a bash.......
I will test mine out at M7 after running in trail shoes for the Canberra Bush marathon the day before. Let's compare notes then
#25
Posted 20 July 2011 - 04:23 PM
im a US 13 - any point even looking yet?
#26
Posted 20 July 2011 - 07:50 PM
I am definitely getting a pair of these shoes. After wearing Roger's for 2 mins last weekend I am so curious to give them a go.
Where did you get yours? Northside Runners?
Good luck for the Canberra/M7 double.
Rob
#27
Posted 20 July 2011 - 08:57 PM
Neo, on 20 July 2011 - 07:50 PM, said:
I am definitely getting a pair of these shoes. After wearing Roger's for 2 mins last weekend I am so curious to give them a go.
Where did you get yours? Northside Runners?
Good luck for the Canberra/M7 double.
Rob
I also couldn't imagine putting up with Roger 200kms into C2K if I didn't give these a good go
Luke at Northside Runners. He's a champ, deserves all the support from us we can give him. Will defs wear them at M7....... no matter how slow.
#28
Posted 19 August 2011 - 02:42 PM
#29
Posted 19 August 2011 - 03:40 PM
Beaver, on 19 August 2011 - 02:42 PM, said:
This review makes me wanna go out and buy a pair!!!!
WAIT< I Already have one!!
Thanks 168!
#30
Posted 24 August 2011 - 01:24 AM
#31
Posted 24 August 2011 - 08:51 AM
#32
Posted 24 August 2011 - 10:14 AM
#33
Posted 24 August 2011 - 10:16 AM
#34
Posted 24 August 2011 - 10:21 AM
#35
Posted 24 August 2011 - 10:39 AM
#36
Posted 26 August 2011 - 04:14 PM
#37
Posted 26 August 2011 - 11:07 PM
#38
Posted 27 August 2011 - 12:16 AM
seris, on 24 August 2011 - 10:21 AM, said:
I definitely need to try a pair of the Bondis on. I had similar issues with the Mafates. I have just updated my review on them here www.trailrunningcompany.com
#39
Posted 27 August 2011 - 05:02 AM
#40
Posted 27 August 2011 - 09:25 PM
cappy, on 27 August 2011 - 05:02 AM, said:
Reflex Sports who distribute in Australia and provided me with the Mafates to test and review for Trail Run Mag Aus/NZ reckons the Combo XT will be better suited to my feet. They are a bit wider in the toebox. So I will probably skip the Bondis and go straight for the Combos. Arrive in Oz in about 3 weeks apparently.
#41
Posted 30 August 2011 - 06:18 PM
#44
Posted 30 August 2011 - 07:39 PM
Edited by Spud, 30 August 2011 - 07:40 PM.
#45
Posted 31 August 2011 - 10:10 AM
Spud, on 30 August 2011 - 07:39 PM, said:
Back to the video, exploiting children is banned in most countries !
#46
Posted 31 August 2011 - 01:29 PM
#47
Posted 31 August 2011 - 01:46 PM
#48
Posted 31 August 2011 - 01:46 PM
Terry has been wearing these for a while.
#50
Posted 31 August 2011 - 06:05 PM
A Year later and about 6 weeks ago, by chance, I was fortunate to test drive them , though a mere minute or two. It was one of those " instant Connection" with a shoe. I am not a one-shoe-man like Beaver (I have Adidas for marathons, Asics Kaino for training,DS for speed work, Newton for halfs, and a 2year old Salomon for trail) However I instantly felt I was running in a better posture. That motivated me to spend (quite a few ) bucks on this new shoe. Contacted Mick from Northside Runners (crows nest) Netted a discount and off I went.
My running time on my Tues hills training with team Ultra168 began to drop. Time for the 10km of hills dropped from averages of 48minutes to a PB of 46.52mins. My half marathon PBs dropped like hot potato too.
So what has changed? Was the transition my ok? (is it REALLY the shoe?)
Yes and no.
The nature of the shoe (and it's structure) almost promote a rather prominent forward lean. Almost similar to Newton shoes, it meant I was fore foot striking lots more (contrary to the believe the chunky Mr Ronald Macdonald Style Sole increases Heal Strike)
My first run with the Hoka (bondi) was a planned 30km run @ ave 4.50mins K. The run ended in only 25km with a mild strain on my Psoas muscle. That tightness lead to my L4/L5 freezing up. It went into a little lock mode and made the run rather uncomfortable. I attribute it to the additional amount of "bounce" and the higher unconscious kick (trailing leg) that leg to my back muscle contracting more than it should. I have to admit I do see Chiropractor every 6 weeks for general "service" of my posture and skeletal adjustments. I stopped twice to stretch my back and hammies. While I thought I would stop using the shoe, after my Chiro adjusted my back in a visit, I did not regret going back once more.
I put on the shoe and resumed training - Then, No problem on my physical body since.
The shoe is great for road. Bar none the best road shoe for (up-hill/ down-hill ) road running. It just feel SO right! All the Chi technique just naturally applied it self. It was almost the shoe is doing all the thinking for you!! My training time gone down and so did last week end's Mount Wilson to Bilpin race time. I had a 4mins plus PB , finishing in a respectable 2.51.19hrs (I know, I am more than 30minutes behind the winner!!
So, Hoka (Bondi) shoe? Great for road, unsealed road and open fire trail. But what about technical stuff??
This leads me to highlight the almost "fatal" weekend I had while training for the Great North Walk miler race. Prior to that training run 2 weekends ago, I ran from CP5 (Somersby) to CP4( Yarramalong) and back in them. The weather was beautiful, the ground was soft, and the shoe? They were great. Thinking they would be the shoe of choice for the 176km outing, i took them out another training run - This time from Basin (CP3) towards Cp2.
MISTAKE!!
Ponkey, on 31 August 2011 - 02:18 PM, said:
That section was laden with mud, wet ferns and algae. It would have made the venue for the MuddyToughBloke Challenge look amature! I was sliding and slipping EVERY step. There were absolutely no grib. No "telons" to stick the shoe for me to glide like (Anna) Frosty over SixFoot Track
As if 61minutes for the first 5km wasnt bad enough, the poor grip on the shoe resulted in two bad falls with one knocking my knee to a bad case of inflammation and the other on my head.
Yes, it was my poor choice of shoe for the training run. It was like V8 engine racing Mount Panorama on a June rainy day on slick tyres. BAD!
I am NOT confident Hoka Bondi will allow the runner be confident of footing for technical and slippery trails. I wouldn't use it for GNW or sections that involves wet bush land or mud. However, it would certainly be my "true Blood" should I front up for Coast to Kosci again. I say it's a must have for those attempting a Road ultra! IT's great. If its anything else, I would hesitate
So instead of Hoka One One as "time to fly", I say it's a shoe " for the sensible one..."
See ultra168's review on Hoka here
Looking forward to test drive the trail version! Dirty? Where are you!!!??? It could be good for Six Foot track!!
Edited by buzzlightyear, 01 September 2011 - 08:29 AM.














