City Bay Fun Run 2011
#101
Posted 21 September 2011 - 10:00 AM
Support our Australian advertisers:
#102
Posted 21 September 2011 - 10:49 AM
LittleDCJ, on 21 September 2011 - 10:00 AM, said:
#103
Posted 21 September 2011 - 10:59 AM
http://www.sarrc.asn...ocial&Itemid=25
It's an informal run that has no fees or forms, you just turn up at West Lakes, sing a carol and then run 8, 13 or 21km and and time yourself. I've never done it but I believe they get a fairly decent turnout.
I couldn't find anything on the SARRC website about it for this year.
#104
Posted 21 September 2011 - 11:23 AM
LittleDCJ, on 21 September 2011 - 10:59 AM, said:
http://www.sarrc.asn...ocial&Itemid=25
It's an informal run that has no fees or forms, you just turn up at West Lakes, sing a carol and then run 8, 13 or 21km and and time yourself. I've never done it but I believe they get a fairly decent turnout.
I couldn't find anything on the SARRC website about it for this year.
#105
Posted 21 September 2011 - 11:25 AM
dazza73, on 21 September 2011 - 09:48 AM, said:
The organisers always want it in print first so that they can sell more newspapers but most years the results appear on the website around lunch the same day or at the latest overnight so that the results and photos/certificates are available the next day. There are sales in photos also so they want them up as soon as possible. The CityBay website initially said certificates would be available 21 Sep which needs results at the same time.
Something has caused them problems. Most likely, lots of people with no start time recorded.
On a slightly different aspect, has anyone else noted that the chances of problems with run management seems to be in proportion to the length of the queues at the Portaloos 15-30 min before the start?
#106
Posted 21 September 2011 - 11:30 AM
Looks like the 2011 results are up.
#107
Posted 21 September 2011 - 12:25 PM
Wedgetail, on 21 September 2011 - 11:25 AM, said:
That would make sense if they didn't give all participants a voucher to get the printed results... I just think their logic is slightly screwy. They could earn way more out of on-line advertising on the search pages!
#108
Posted 21 September 2011 - 12:56 PM
Quote
#109
Posted 21 September 2011 - 01:34 PM
PS Great to see so many SA Road Runner members winning their Age Group!
#110
Posted 21 September 2011 - 03:46 PM
The online results are correct and the discrepancy between printed results and online does affect some SARRC members.
#111
Posted 21 September 2011 - 04:00 PM
Itsfunatthebackofthepack, on 18 September 2011 - 04:06 PM, said:
Actually the 12 km walkers were started before all of the 12 km runners could start. I positioned myself right at the back as I haven't done any training all year and as we were let off we saw that the walkers on the other side of the road were already going. Not happy!!! I was yelling at people (politely if course) to move to the left at first, but quickly ran out of extra breath for that sort of thing
I'm going to be very ambitious and aim for a sub 60 next year. I want a pink bib
#112
Posted 21 September 2011 - 04:01 PM
They've been really helpful for me and will adjust my time to 52.26 based on my garmin time - i'm just having a little chuckle because yesterday my time in the paper was 55.07, this morning online it was 55.34 and now it's 55.09.
#113
Posted 21 September 2011 - 04:33 PM
Ames43, on 21 September 2011 - 04:01 PM, said:
They've been really helpful for me and will adjust my time to 52.26 based on my garmin time - i'm just having a little chuckle because yesterday my time in the paper was 55.07, this morning online it was 55.34 and now it's 55.09.
Would people stop doing that... my placing keeps changing!!
#114
Posted 29 September 2011 - 10:29 AM
i would also loved to have been able to do the murray man this year, but even the short event on the saturday, the 250m swim would probably kill me.
maybe next year
#116
Posted 01 October 2011 - 06:03 PM














