DS Trainers - a bit lacking?
#1
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:26 PM
Now I now it is a lighter midsole and the next model is changing but i have been running in the DS Trainer fo over 8 years without trouble , this model seems to be "hollow" in the forefoot. Just wondering if anyone is or has had the same trouble .
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:35 PM
#3
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:40 PM
#4
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:50 PM
#5
Posted 02 December 2004 - 03:58 PM
Stu,like your son I have been doing my long runs in Kayanos,but I'll give my DS trainers that job from now on ( I think the new kayanos feel too unnatural for my liking) or think about the new 2100s.
#6
Posted 02 December 2004 - 04:04 PM
Switched to the Brooks Burn which is about the same weight as the DS Trainer and would rate (for me) as the best running shoe I have worn. Couldnt reccomend more highly and a great alternative to the DS Trainer.
#7
Posted 02 December 2004 - 04:15 PM
I have done a half marathon race in the VIIIs, but probably wouldn't do long training runs in either pair. I had a bit of an episode of shin splints a fortnight ago which I think was a warning sign that I do need to run in a pronation support shoe for long training runs. Picked up a pair of XI Kayanos which relieved the problem immediately.
#8
Posted 02 December 2004 - 05:06 PM
#9
Posted 02 December 2004 - 06:08 PM
#10
Posted 03 December 2004 - 01:30 AM
I have noticed that quite a few people have come through my door who have had problems with the last couple of models of DS Trainer. It seems that there are a bit more flimsy than previously and break down quickly- they are less stiff torsionally almost like they have removed the shank from the shoe.
I have queried the asics people about this, but they deny any great change. Their suggestion is that the people who are wearing them and having problems are not suited to that style of shoe (duh)- the problem is that these are people who have been wearing them for years previously quite happily.
I actually don't rate them as highly as I used to , and don't recommend them to many people.
I have thought about asking the coolrunners if many others had noticed the change in the DS trainers and someone beat me to it!!
Any more?
Cheers!
#11
Posted 03 December 2004 - 12:02 PM
#12
Posted 03 December 2004 - 02:23 PM
#13
Posted 03 December 2004 - 07:37 PM
#14
Posted 05 December 2004 - 01:13 AM
#15
Posted 06 December 2004 - 01:42 PM
#16
Posted 07 December 2004 - 05:52 PM
#17
Posted 07 December 2004 - 08:47 PM
#18
Posted 12 December 2004 - 05:18 PM
Thanks for the replies , very usefull to know others are are finding the same problems.
#19
Posted 12 December 2004 - 09:00 PM
They are due out this month sometime.
Ian C :)
#20
Posted 29 December 2004 - 06:39 PM
1.They seem to hug the heel a bit more.
2. Dont seem as tight on the top of the foot
3. More mesh for airflow on the shoe.
As I said I havent had a run in them yet so will report back later.
Ian C :)
#21
Posted 29 December 2004 - 07:00 PM
Noting Running Science's comments on the Bay Run, I reckon the surface around there is rock hard and is going to exacerbate any foot problems you might have. The couple of times I've had shin splints they've always been worse around there.
#22
Posted 13 January 2005 - 06:37 PM
Couple of things I noticed was the amount of ventilation in the shoe compared to the previous and they seem to fit snugly around the ankle. Cushioning seemed very good, but then most new shoes do!
For those who have been disappointed in the previous versions it might be worth having a look at these as Running Science has told us that Asics reckon they have fixed the problems.
Ian C :)
#23
Posted 13 January 2005 - 08:50 PM
It appears ASICS are trying to stuff more into their shoes with every model for the sake of additional coin on the price tag. Looking at the new models, the 2100 appears to have the features some of the earlier Kayanos had at a significantly lower cost than the Kayanos, and DS Trainer seems to be too much shoe (feature-wise)for what is supposed to be the benchmark in its category. A lot of people seem to buy the latest Asics for the sake of perceived credibility (NOT EVERYONE!!!).
It's a shame that people don't do their own research, but thinking for ourselves can be dangerous, can't it?
#24
Posted 04 April 2005 - 12:39 PM
i recently bought a pair of DS trainers IX from you, they are light which i love, im not sure if your the salesman that assisted me, but if you were i wouldnt have minded to buy the incoming X model.
not sure if by forefoot cushioning problems you mean a pain in the front of my feet, because that is what i get, perhaps due to them being only run in once so far =)















