How Long to keep shoes
#1
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:24 AM
I was formerly Happy to Run. My query is I was wondering how long I should use a pair of running shoes. I currently have a pair of Brooks Vapours which are great but I'm a little concerned that after 12 months of usually 25-30 kms a week before upping to closer to 40 over the last 8 weeks they may have come to the end of their tether.
While I have been running for well over 2 yrs I am inexpereienced in the sense that I haven't run with many people or participated in any major events so want some advice from those with more expereience than me.
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:34 AM
I tried to find a few old thread on this and there are probably a few buried in the shoes/ gear section.
I have heard the number 600-700 km mentioned a few times but much depends also on how you run and the wearing rate of your own shoes.
I normally change when the soles go and this is probably too late. Often if I get niggles I think it is time for the shoes to go and the niggles go away.
All the best
Plu
PS: Welcome to blogging
#3
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:44 AM
I've got about 6 pairs at the moment and I reckon that you'd need a minimum of three anyway: your old trainers, the new ones you are breaking in and your racers. Racers are for when you go in an event - they are lighter and make you go faster!
Grandpa
#4
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:55 AM
But really, please, just dispose of your old runners to the op shop.
Shoes have great sentimental value. I hang onto the old Kyanos that i ran the 2000 host city in.
But bottom line, life gets difficult if we accumulate worn out possessions..
Be brutal. Dump it...
Brendan
#5
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:56 AM
Take heart! Running is still the cheapest sport! If a pair of shoes lasts you a year, it's only a couple of bucks a week :D
Grandpa
#6
Posted 28 April 2005 - 04:08 AM
At any given time, I'm usually rotating 3 pairs.
#7
Posted 28 April 2005 - 04:09 AM
Cliff had worn the fat pads down under his feet from so much running, so he had to change them before they got too worn.
I think one of the shoe companies used to give them to him, but they weren't top-of-the-range.
Running shoes provide maximum shock absorption for 200 kms (about 150,000 strides), then they slowly breakdown until by 600 kms they can no longer provide adequate protection.
Sometimes, you can keep wearing them up to 2,000 kms, but if you are easily injured, then you should have a backup pair to break in from about the 400 km mark, to allow a smooth transition.
If you have problems with sore knees, it can sometimes be caused by your eyes or a stiff neck altering your balance and the angle your feet land. There are a number of exercises to reset the eyes and neck.
#8
Posted 28 April 2005 - 05:59 AM
If you have a few pairs with different miles on them it is easy to pick when the old ones need to be retired.
When it is time to lay them to rest I give them a wash and tie them together, then I have a little think about all the races they have done and all the training. Then I put them in one of the clothes bins. Unless they are KT 26’s then they just get chucked I figure not even the poor want my old KT’s.
#9
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:16 AM
Tim, I can't believe they still make KT 26's yet alone someone actually runs in them. Ever thought of donating the old pairs to a museum? :D
#10
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:13 AM
see http://www.infopleas.../mm-bikila.html
#11
Posted 28 April 2005 - 02:54 PM
Tim, I can't believe they still make KT 26's yet alone someone actually runs in them. Ever thought of donating the old pairs to a museum?
[/indent]mate!!
you should read my blog. There has been a nation wide shortage of KT's for the last few months. I happily picked up 2 pair the other day though. Even though they are not as popular there are still some of us out there training and racing in them. I saw a couple of pair at the 6 foot and a pair at Canberra. The guy at Canberra was quite fast and strengthened my faith in the beloved shoe.
#12
Posted 28 April 2005 - 02:59 PM
#13
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:19 PM
Tim, I can't believe they still make KT 26's yet alone someone actually runs in them. Ever thought of donating the old pairs to a museum?
[/indent]Yeah even though I have little knowledge of how long shoes last, as a physio student K-mart brand shoes that you can get for $25 on special are unlikely to give your feet the support you need. In most cases you are better going bare foot than wearing cheap shoes. Besides the technology in today's shoes is so much more advanced than they were even 5 years back making it wise to buy more expensive shoes that are designed better for your feet
#14
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:30 PM
and they were $28 on special.
but thanks for the tip <_<
#15
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:34 PM
This might sound a bit OTT but if you keep a running log then it's fairly easy to track the kms you do in each pair. Take a thick marker pen and number each shoe inside the heel (on the insole) then include a column for your shoe number in your records. Do it in excel and you can set it all up nicely to add up the totals for each shoe.
#16
Posted 28 April 2005 - 05:05 PM
I'm actually coming up for some new shoes - found that Stringer had 2090s for $159.50 (including P&P) - my current 2090s have gone well so thought this was too good to refuse!
#17
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:36 PM
I also spreadshet my runs so I can keep track of how the shoes are performing - once you have a spreadshest set up in is easy...... :D
#18
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:38 PM
Originally posted by Fats:
This might sound a bit OTT but if you keep a running log then it's fairly easy to track the kms you do in each pair. Take a thick marker pen and number each shoe inside the heel (on the insole) then include a column for your shoe number in your records. Do it in excel and you can set it all up nicely to add up the totals for each shoe.
[/indent]I use a spreadsheet called longrun.xls downloaded from a link that appeared in a CR thread last year. It keeps tabs on up to 5 pairs of shoes. Very cool.
Gronk
#19
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:00 PM
Last shoes that I bought were $220 discounted to $160. Nine weeks for 800k gives a cost of ~$18 per week.
Having three pairs on the go doesn't change the economics, it just means $480 for 27 weeks, cost~$18 per week.
I'm happy to spend the money, but I don't think I'm a cheapskate when I touch them up with Spredsole now and then.
Don't you do much running?
#20
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:06 PM
Some brands stand up better than others. Don't want to bag some brands out, but just remember, the big gun athletes sponsored by the big gun companies can afford to replace their shoes after every run and believe me, some of the returns we got it was not surprising.
Testing shoes that Brooks have the highest qualty parts in terms of density in their EVA (stuff used to make soles) and hold up better to wear than any other brand.
A good tip for when to replace shoes. The midsole usually gets creases after a few km's. After you've had your shoes for a while, take them into a shop and compare them to new ones. If yours has too many creases on the innersole, try the new ones on and see if they deel heaps better.
Oh, one more tip, if $ are tight, put new inner soles in the shoes, should help you get a few more km's out for a $15 investment.
#21
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:56 PM
Originally posted by Welshy:
Oh, one more tip, if $ are tight, put new inner soles in the shoes, should help you get a few more km's out for a $15 investment.
[/indent]If you can get them. I used to replace the insoles in my Brooks shoes at 250 miles. Then the retailer said that the Australian Brooks distributor said he wouldn't supply them, as it would rob him of sales! Well it did, as I haven't bought Brooks since.
[indent]quote:
Originally posted by SoLucky:
Granpa, the only way that I could keep myself in shoes for "a couple of dollars a week", would be if I was to cut my training by about 90%.
Last shoes that I bought were $220 discounted to $160. Nine weeks for 800k gives a cost of ~$18 per week.
[/indent]That's why I now buy all my shoes on eBay, and spend less than half what you've quoted. My last pair (Mizuno) cost me around AUD70, including postage
#22
Posted 29 April 2005 - 06:46 AM
In most cases you are better going bare foot than wearing cheap shoes.
[/indent]Nicho, don't be too hard on the lad, he's saving for a new fandagled headlight :D
And guys, what's with the textas and spreadsheets? I thought I was anal but you guys are starting to scare me. :P
#23
Posted 29 April 2005 - 12:00 PM
#24
Posted 29 April 2005 - 03:08 PM
So my dilemma is, do I buy another pair now and start rotating them or hold off - how long on average (I realise there are variables) does it take to break in a pair of shoes?
Thanks
#25
Posted 29 April 2005 - 05:18 PM
In 2000 Hennig and Milani measured pressure and force in new shoes they then had subjects run a stanadised 10km loop daily over grass, gravel, concrete and bitumen. After 220km there was a 10% increase in heel pressures.
In 1985 Cook and others used a mechanical loading devices to measure a decrease cushioning properties. They found an expenantial decrease in shoe cushioning. After 250-500 miles shoes retained 60% of there initialcushioning properties.
#26
Posted 29 April 2005 - 05:57 PM
Try2runfaster, not sure if they make shoes to fit those big ugly clobbers of yours. LOL.
#27
Posted 29 April 2005 - 07:00 PM
Originally posted by Chelle:
So my dilemma is, do I buy another pair now and start rotating them or hold off - how long on average (I realise there are variables) does it take to break in a pair of shoes?
Thanks
[/indent]Chelle - you want the shoes to be worn-in but still as new as possible so they retain their maximum cushioning and that new shoe "spring". So buy a pair, take them out for a few runs (including some long ones), make sure they don't rub or give you blisters, and then once you're happy set them aside for the big day. I like to have done at least 150km in a pair before a big race.
#28
Posted 29 April 2005 - 07:49 PM
Originally posted by how2runfaster Am I the only person who has only 1 pair of runners? I only have 2 feet!
[/indent]LOL. I used to think the same but after some initial niggles I went to see the Footman.
He advised that with different running (speed work vs long runs) it was best to have AT LEAST two pairs of shoes. When you run fast you wear your shoe out differently than when you just plod along on the long runs.
For the past 4 months I have had two pairs and it was worked great. I think it actually gives you more mileage from each pair as well.
#29
Posted 29 April 2005 - 07:49 PM
#30
Posted 29 April 2005 - 08:24 PM
Originally posted by Fats:
Chelle - you want the shoes to be worn-in but still as new as possible so they retain their maximum cushioning and that new shoe "spring". So buy a pair, take them out for a few runs (including some long ones), make sure they don't rub or give you blisters, and then once you're happy set them aside for the big day. I like to have done at least 150km in a pair before a big race. [/qb]
[/indent]Thanks Fats... trip to the running shop on my way home tomorrow morning I think is needed :)
#31
Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:57 AM
KJ said: Does anyone else have the problem with the inside heel of their runners wearing away faster than any other part of the shoe?
[/indent]Me too. I even do it in my work shoes. Very annoying but doesn't stop me from wearing out the rest of the shoe before they mow lawns. My problem is that I have so many shoes to mow lawns in I seem to be forever mowing lawns :D
Maybe I should try some KT 26's? Pitty about the drought. ;)
#32
Posted 01 May 2005 - 06:27 AM
This thread has convinced me to buy a second pair - but the outlet sport shoe shop dont have my size in 2090's - not sure if I should change to a different brand but similar stability/cushioning, or fork out a bit more for the same ones elsewhere.
Any opinions - consistency or variety? :)
#33
Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:18 AM
#34
Posted 02 May 2005 - 04:53 AM
I think I remember seeing a 7 on Uncle Dave’s shoes at a 6 Foot training run. So maybe he has a pair for everyday of the week.
#35
Posted 02 May 2005 - 06:17 AM
#36
Posted 02 May 2005 - 02:43 PM
:)
#37
Posted 02 May 2005 - 03:57 PM
The other advice I had received many years ago was that it was important for the feet's muscles not to adapt to a single shoe structure. The theory was to keep them guessing with different shoes so that the muscles are continually working and thereby getting stronger. With this in mind, I try to ensure the shoes are rotated for each run
#38
Posted 02 May 2005 - 08:49 PM
I have a bit of a problem at the moment and have been wondering what to do?
My two pair of long distance shoes(Adidas Ozweego and Saucony Grid Trigon) even though rotated quite a lot, are both now pretty well worn <_<
I actually have a few pairs of newer shoes, even another pair of Ozweego bought at the end of last year! which all can handle a speed work session(8k) and about 10 to 12k road running pretty well...but it was the Ozweego that I wore last weekend at the Brisbane Half, up to 15k they were fine but after that the rubbing just became severe and bisters on burst blisters resulted in a bit of a mess, which took a couple of days for my feet to recover from.
Nervously I wore these same shoes yesterday for a 14k road race and I got through...just!! that painful hot rubbing threatened to cause blisters again towards the end!
so now..despite trying to do the right thing, I have even tried American blister resistant socks to no prevail!!(obviously a gimmick!!) I just want to know how I can minimize foot damage whilst I try to wear in my temperamental shoes!!?
I just can't remember having so much of a problem in the past!? maybe my feet have become soft?
:unsure:
Please any advice would be welcome, thank you.
#39
Posted 03 May 2005 - 04:16 AM
#40
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:44 AM
This thread has got me thinking about how I have been running and walking around in old shoes. I reckon it can contribute to a few feet/leg issues. Thanks everyone. I just threw out 4 old pairs of running shoes.
Cheers
Plu
Edit: Sorry I did it Monday night and the bin went yesterday morning.
#41
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:47 AM
CoolRunning is just on the verge of announcing www.recycledrunners.com.au















