Customised shoes- Adidas
#1
Posted 02 March 2005 - 10:37 PM
Haven't worn Adidas in years but liked the shoe I used to wear(1980's), cant think of the name but they were white/grey with the 3 red stripes.
Ian C :)
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 03 March 2005 - 01:16 AM
#3
Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:11 AM
The shoes are fitted and "designed" in your local participating store, the order sent to Germany, collated and aggregated, then built in China, and shipped back to the store where you ordered them.
Cost seems reasonable - but details will have to wait another week.
So, look for an update in the very near future and I should have the full story for you. :)
#4
Posted 03 March 2005 - 11:23 AM
Apparently it's a 3 week manufacturing process so i'll be getting just after (or maybe just before) Six Foot, will certainly be interested to see how they go (seeing that we had to have something printed on the shoes they will have "Kelvin" on them - my very original thoughts !!)
#5
Posted 03 March 2005 - 01:12 PM
Do you wear orthotics, or have any idea how they handle that if not? Ta.
md
#6
Posted 03 March 2005 - 03:32 PM
kazz.
#7
Posted 03 March 2005 - 03:46 PM
#8
Posted 03 March 2005 - 04:02 PM
Moondust, they handle orthotics without a problem (I wear orthotics). Left and right can be different sizes and widths. :)
#9
Posted 03 March 2005 - 04:35 PM
#10
Posted 03 March 2005 - 06:00 PM
#11
Posted 03 March 2005 - 06:51 PM
I'll have to go home and look at my receipt to recall my colours. Off hand were grey with yellow highlights (the sales person had a yellow pair on and my immediate thought was that it was a colour that would stay clean for about the time it took to open the box).
As i'd booked the fitting a week before i had plenty of time to think of a message just couldn't think of anything flash (with a 10 letter limit) was tempted to get "Coolrunner" on one foot and Kelvin on the other but decided i'd better have them matching (ought to be hard to pinch ????).
At $240 were a little dearer than my usual but reckoned it was my big chance of getting a pair which fits both my feet perfectly (certainly better than buying 2 pairs - one of each size - not as though i ever have ;) )
Kelvin
#12
Posted 03 March 2005 - 07:05 PM
#13
Posted 03 March 2005 - 07:36 PM
Nike have been running a similar sort of program for years now (Nike ID) although limited to colour schemes and a message and only available to US residents.
The famed story goes that Nike agree to print anything as long as its not offensive, racist, sexist in any manner, but refused the request of a protestor to have SWEAT SHOP printed on his shoes!
#14
Posted 03 March 2005 - 09:15 PM
#15
Posted 27 March 2005 - 07:17 PM
The testing/fitting is due in Perth next month and even though its only an opinion, I would be interested in seeing how you went.
Interestingly enough the "shoe dog" picked out the Supernova as one shoe that could be suitable for me from the info I supplied.
Ian C :)
#16
Posted 27 March 2005 - 08:26 PM
my shoes arrived on Thursday, so have only been out in them once. Will write up report and publish in the next day or 3...
#17
Posted 28 March 2005 - 05:25 PM
I would have been keen to build a lightweight trainer but at $240 I'm not in a financial position to justify the cost.
#18
Posted 04 April 2005 - 03:23 PM
#19
Posted 04 April 2005 - 03:49 PM
Am virtually completely resting until Canberra Marathon (ie only working into work this week), so intend to run them in the next couple of weeks
Kelvin
#20
Posted 05 April 2005 - 04:21 AM
From what I understand, the consultation costs around the 120 Aussie dollars and then you add on the cost of the shoes.
Obviously not a cheap service, but you are getting tailormade shoes ...and in your own colour choice.
Talking of Adidas, has anyone seen the new range of racing shoes? very impressive
#21
Posted 05 April 2005 - 03:57 PM
Overall, having run in them for a two weeks now, I would give the resulting shoes a 7 out of 10. If you like the SuperNova and depending on how much value you place on personalisation, then it may be worthwhile. I doubt if I will do it again as I find the SuperNova a bit too stiff and I like a more curved last on my shoes. However, the process was good, friendly, and the final product a reasonable fit - but not perfect for me. :)
#22
Posted 05 April 2005 - 09:46 PM
Good to get the report and for the rest of us I guess its personal choice. If the supernova is a shoe that suits you then it will probably be worth it. If not, you may be better outlaying $240.00 for shoes that are better for you.
Pabags :)
#23
Posted 06 April 2005 - 04:28 AM
Also a service worth considering if you're injury prone.
#24
Posted 06 April 2005 - 03:50 PM
Also a service worth considering if you're injury prone.
[/indent]Not too sure where you are coming from with that, Owain. In terms of size and fit it may help, but given the base shoe is the Supernova then that may cause more problems that it fixes - the Supernova, like any other shoe, is not perfect for everyone. So, no matter how much they customise, if the straight last and stiff sole don't work for you then it will only lead to injury... :unsure:
#25
Posted 06 April 2005 - 06:30 PM
Definate pros and cons to this service. I'd be interested to see what Footman has to say.
#26
Posted 07 June 2005 - 11:06 PM
#28
Posted 09 June 2005 - 10:19 PM
I compare this to say, what is done by Chris Sole (who I ran with at Uni) down on the South Island of NZ these days.
Chris was a 345 1500 runnerat Uni and still gives the allcomers a bit of a shake in NZ at age 47.
According to a mutual friend, Chris (now a Physio) has an arrangement with shoes retailers whereby his clients fit on say four pairs of shoes and take them all to Chris for a running analysis.
He then chooses the best pair for the runner, based on measurements and biomech analysis, then modifies each individual shoe to the requirements of each foot/leg/running style etc.
The other shoes are then returned to shop and the runner only pays for the shoe he keeps.
btw isn't 'Sole' one of those nominative deterministic names for what he does?
Regarding the Adidas review, it appears that Adidas marketing dept were a bit naive in that they had little control over it.
Whilst Action wasn't too critical, the shoe in its off the shelf form would not be one he would choose, and the last is not suited to his foot/running style (by his own admission).
Therefore you are not going to get him over the moon about the custom shoe. And I am not questioning his objectivity here. Its not his fault.
Better for them to have chosen a runner who already prefers the Supernova (or an equivalent shoe).
With all due respect, you won't ask a vegetarian to review a steakhouse. :)















