Trail running shoes
#1
Posted 18 April 2005 - 10:26 PM
Just wanted to get some feedback on peoples experience with different types of shoes for trail running ?
I've been using salomon for the past few years but am interested to see what else is out there (pearl izumi ???)
cheers
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 18 April 2005 - 10:37 PM
In fact, since then I've been mainly sticking to road shoes but was seriously considering testing the Asics Orient which are meant to be a lightweight trail/racing hybrid. Would love to hear news on this shoe ...
#3
Posted 19 April 2005 - 04:12 PM
kazz. B)
#4
Posted 19 April 2005 - 04:12 PM
Their drawbacks are that they aren't waterproof and they won't protect your feet from the really sharp rocks.
I also find them quite good on the road if I have to run between trails, but they are a little unresponsive (I guess cushioning is sacrificed for support).
Maybe you can tell me what the Salomons are like. I've been interested in getting some for a while now (which model?). What are they like on the road? They look super comfortable.
The Orients do look pretty good, but maybe more for cross-country races.
I also like the look of the Teva Romeros, especially for the wet stuff (not waterproof but look like they will drain/dry out quickly)
#5
Posted 19 April 2005 - 04:17 PM
my last pr of Trabuco's were waterproof, they were called Trabuco H2o,from the US eBay website(great price too). My Saucony Grid Shadow are also waterproof.
kazz.
#6
Posted 19 April 2005 - 04:18 PM
I also have several pairs of Mizuno Wave Wildwood, which are based on the Wave Rider, but pitched for on-road and off-road. I use these the most, especially where I might run on road for 10k or so and then go off-road for an equal distance. Possibly the most comfortable running shoes I've had.
#7
Posted 19 April 2005 - 04:28 PM
#8
Posted 19 April 2005 - 05:04 PM
Goretex shoes are mainly intended for running in snow, which is not a common scenario in Australia. In such conditions one assumes your feet wouldn't sweat as much as usual.
#9
Posted 19 April 2005 - 05:08 PM
Cheers,
Jo
#10
Posted 19 April 2005 - 05:08 PM
I read somewhere that the difference between Aussie and Kiwi trailrunners was that when the Aussies get to a stream they take their shoes off and wade, while the Kiwis just plough straight through. Is this true? I reckon they must get very pruney feet and bad blisters from this, I would always avoid saturating my feet.
#11
Posted 19 April 2005 - 05:13 PM
Have to look into the Trabuco's.
The salomons (Flagstaff) have been a good work horse. My latest pair have really been punished and have held up well. A mate of mine has a pair of the XA Pro's and has been happy with them. They have a fancy kevlar lacing system, not sure how they'll last long term. They are a little heavier than a typical road shoe but are very supportive over technical, rocky terrain and are well ventilated.
#12
Posted 19 April 2005 - 06:26 PM
when i did Cradle in '03, we spent the 1st 3hrs running with wet feet (the trail had turned into a flowing stream). I used a pair of coolmax type socks and my shoes/feet were dry within an hour after the trail improved. Never needed to change socks and no blisters afte the race.
#13
Posted 19 April 2005 - 06:34 PM
But as Mr G has said I would see the waterproofing being necessary in snow.
I think taking your shoes off to wade through water is for wimps :)
#14
Posted 19 April 2005 - 08:34 PM
Originally posted by tim:
I think taking your shoes off to wade through water is for wimps :)
[/indent]We don't get much water here in Adelaide, so I've never had to try it!
#15
Posted 19 April 2005 - 09:52 PM
thanks for the feedback on the "Orient". I'll try them out next time I'm due for a pair.
tim,
I find my waterproof Trabuco's to "breath" pretty well, but the Saucony Grid Shadows seem to make my feet fairly hot on warm days.
kazz.
#16
Posted 20 April 2005 - 01:55 AM
Inov8 shoes seem to have had good reviews and appear to be the first brand to have had success in challenging the dominance of Walsh shoes in British fell running circles. The Flyroc 310 is one of their models more suited to Australian style trail running.
Just finished my first run in them, and they felt good to me - stable, lightweight and comfortable - although I was only running around the local park. I'll be taking them down to the Illawarra short course mountain race on Monday to test them out on the real stuff.
P.S. If anyone wants to order Inov8 shoes over the internet, I would recommend Pete Bland Sports of Kendal, England. My pair arrived within 6 days of me placing my order.
#17
Posted 20 April 2005 - 03:13 AM
I have raced in the inov8 mudrocks this year as they are super light and extremely grippy. I have never felt a shoe with the level of traction of these shoes. They are especially relevant for X-C or mountain races on grass, firetrail or mud. They diffinately are not suitable on courses with sealed sections therefore I didn't wear them for the NSW Mountain titles. They will be extremely relevent for the Aust titles however. Like all good things they do have a down side however. Every time I wear them I tighten up in the calf and am sore for days (sometimes even weeks ) so if only a training session or low priority race I leave them at home.
My other shoes I recently got were the new Brooks trail shoe, the cascadia. Only out for 1 month and still very hard to find these shoes were great. They are not the lightest trail shoe being 250g as opposed to the inov8 but they are stable, grippy comforable and look extremely cool in fluro yellow. I got my pair from brooks directly as a prize from a race but I would definately encourage you to source these for longer trail sessions and races such as six foot etc.
#18
Posted 20 April 2005 - 04:20 AM
#19
Posted 20 April 2005 - 07:07 AM
I am sure I have seen an ad in a running mag where they are pouring water into a trail shoe and the water is simply pouring out through the shoes material.
[/indent]I think this is an ad for the latest Teva trail runners (name escapes me). I ran in an earlier model the Teva Elden and found them surprisingly good despite not very aggressive tread. But my feet have spread and they only came in full sizes and the next size up was too big. <_<
I'm currently running in Montrail Leona Divides which I love and stocked up on from Snogum as they off loaded this now old model. Only really bad experience was with a pair of Solomon xc pros (?) which nearly cut my feet in half and left me with a nasty swollen tendon.
Gotta love running thru water, though. :)
#20
Posted 28 April 2005 - 03:27 AM
Also, any advice on what type of trail running shoes I should wear for the OXFAM Trailwalker(training and racing) would be much appreciated.
#21
Posted 28 April 2005 - 08:45 PM
Also, any advice on what type of trail running shoes I should wear for the OXFAM Trailwalker(training and racing) would be much appreciated.
#22
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:04 PM
They're based in Melbourne, have really good discounted shoes & clothing (asics only), and you get a free shoe bag, pair of socks and keyring thrown in with every shoe purchase too. I think their current price on the Orient is $129, and it's about the same for the Trabuco. Only takes about 3 days postage too.
Best of luck
#23
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:25 PM
Last week in NZ I ran the Xterra 11km off road in Rotorua, on the roughest trail run I've ever done. Lots of mossy rocky bits, and narrow up and down trails, with steep up and downhill sections.
The 375s ate it up.
Two days later I ran a 5km road run in Auckland in them, and ran my best 5km time for 2 years.
Despite all the marketing hype, you DON'T have to pay a lot for good shoes! ;)
#24
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:35 PM
#25
Posted 28 April 2005 - 10:49 PM
#26
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:47 PM
#27
Posted 29 April 2005 - 06:19 AM
Tim they would clash with your KT's in the wardrobe ;)
#28
Posted 29 April 2005 - 12:16 PM















