I've just bought a new pair of Size 12 2100's, after four pairs of 2090's. Either my feet have shrunk, or the 2100's are nearly half a size bigger than the 2090's.
Has anyone had a similar problem?
•
Asics 2100's - 5% More at No Extra Cost???
Started by Spot, Feb 01 2005 09:54 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 01 February 2005 - 09:54 PM
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 02 February 2005 - 11:01 AM
Spot,
My feet are a little smaller than yours at 9.5.
I bought a pair of 2100's last Friday and they fit perfectly in the same way the my 2090's do.
I got a great price of $160 also.
Perhaps your feet really have shrunk. :)
My feet are a little smaller than yours at 9.5.
I bought a pair of 2100's last Friday and they fit perfectly in the same way the my 2090's do.
I got a great price of $160 also.
Perhaps your feet really have shrunk. :)
#3
Posted 02 February 2005 - 12:50 PM
I have size 9 in these shoes and have had every model from the 2000 series up. I found the 2100 to be the same length as the 2090's and 2080's etc, etc...
Regards
Greeny
Regards
Greeny
#4
Posted 02 February 2005 - 01:31 PM
Thanks guys - looks like it's just me.
Funny, I went up a half size at the start of last year when I began increasing mileage. Maybe the distance-induced swelling is going down.
•
Funny, I went up a half size at the start of last year when I began increasing mileage. Maybe the distance-induced swelling is going down.
•
#5
Posted 02 February 2005 - 07:55 PM
AimHigh, where did you get the 2100's for $160 - Sydney somewhere or on the web??
#6
Posted 02 February 2005 - 08:51 PM
Sports Co at Eastgardens Westfield shopping centre.
They were on sale - not sure how long it was going on but it was only last Friday I bought them so you could be lucky.
They also had Kayano's on sale but can't remember the price.
They were on sale - not sure how long it was going on but it was only last Friday I bought them so you could be lucky.
They also had Kayano's on sale but can't remember the price.















