Jump to content


KT26's will get u there ??


19 replies to this topic

#1 wannabeagreyhound

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 132 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 02

Posted 03 June 2002 - 09:30 AM

Im currently training for the Melbourne marathon as it will be the first marathon Ive had a go at Im hoping my old training parter the KT26 runner lined with sorbathane inners will get me over the line as they have done in the last couple of puffing billy runs with comfort,durability and affordability,Does anyone have a view on this or can someone point me in the direction of a shoe that can match the old dunlop legend on price,performance and longivity.

Regards
Daz


Support our Australian advertisers:

#2 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 03 June 2002 - 09:02 PM

Sorry mate but I can only say you're mad if you don't find decent shoes for a marathon. Last year there was a loony in thongs going unbelievably strong and fast for the first 20 m in the Melbourne Marathon but he hobbled off and disappeared after that. Your body takes enough of a beating over 42 km without excessive jarring from bad shoes, not to mention bruised soles, blackened toenails, blisters and worse. Do yourself a favour and go to a good running shoe shop. Take your old shoes so they can see how they wear, and analyse your needs. Once you find a good shoe, stick with it. $ per km it's well worth it - you'll probably be doing 80 km plus a week near the end of your training and bad shoes will cause injury at the worst possible time. Buy new ones the exact size and design 3 weeks before the marathon, run them in and use them on the day. Check out www.runnersworld.com 'shoefinder' for some general info but go to a good shop with staff who run real distances. I'm very happy with Asics 2060s from Athlete's Foot ($125 last year).

#3 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 04 June 2002 - 12:44 AM

You are a lucky devil if you find the old K26ers do the job for you.Stick with them if that is your history,I personally found that my calves twanged like guitar strings when I tried them many years ago.They are good on price and durability as you say,if they do you stick with it,there is a lot of bs re the need for "expensive" shoes,I ran most of my early years in the old Tigers,only got troubles when the experts started to get involved in shoe design. :)

#4

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 04 June 2002 - 08:59 AM

Rob is spot on.I run in brooks addiction $160 . Because they have a staberlizer in them and I need something to counteract my pronation. :)

#5 wannabeagreyhound

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 132 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 02

Posted 04 June 2002 - 09:41 AM

Thanks for your feed back Ill take it on board and do some research on getting a more appropriate style of runnining shoe,

Cheers Daz


#6 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 04 June 2002 - 06:59 PM

Re Rob and loony in thongs : I have seen the runner in thongs over the last 7 -8 years at the Melbourne Marathon. After speaking to him a couple of years ago, it was very interesting to find out all about him and why he runs in thongs. I say hello whenever I come across him, and I know he finishes every year.
While I wouldn't choose thongs, I reckon it's great that he does in every year - he must almost be a spartan!
I wouldn't run in KT 26 either. ASICS are the shoes for marathon runners - 2060 or 2070 are great shoes, but if you want to lash out buy a pair of Kayano's. 1070's are a cheaper option, but only have Gel at back of shoe, not in front.

#7 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 04 June 2002 - 10:14 PM

I think you should stay with what works. Don't buy into the hype about needing all this techno shoe stuff. I reckon it is simply fluff perpetuated by shoe companies to sell expensive shoes. If you run correctly there should not be any "excessive jarring ..... not to mention bruised soles, blackened toenails, blisters and worse".

Rob, I think either you have a problem with your running form or you are selling shoes.


#8 wannabeagreyhound

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 132 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 02

Posted 05 June 2002 - 09:11 AM

RE: Loony in thongs this fellow sounds like a legend is the dude making a political statement about major shoe corporations??? or he is just an eccentric, whatever the case maybe he must be tough running 42ks in a pair of thongs and if I catch up to the man in October at the finish line Ill by him a stubbie.

#9 flat feet

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 495 posts
  • Joined: 05-August 01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Altitude 76 feet, Sydney - Inner West

Posted 05 June 2002 - 09:02 PM

Whatever works! I have appallingly flat feet and have moved from ASIC Gels to the Brooks described earlier. The thong dude sounds like he's making a statement of some kind like my shoes cost 99c how much do yours.
Coming from Rogaing I've marvelled at the KT26 wearers who can do a 24 hour event across broken ground and trails and then not hobble like I do afterwards.
I've seen entries from evangalistic bushwalkers boast about wearing Dunlop Volleys in log books and criticising those who don't as if they should. If I did I would have stopped doing anything beyond walking to the corner shop years ago.
Now where are those foot casts the back door needs propping open.

#10 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 06 June 2002 - 04:36 PM

Thongs suck
Shoes rule Ok

#11 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 06 June 2002 - 08:56 PM

Ran my first marathon in KT26 many years ago with no problemo. But only 3hrs 40mins. If they work for your feet - good luck! I have now found better shoes that work for me such as nike air-span triax. Some ascis, brooks and NB can be fine too. Try whatever fits and feels good on your foot. It has to work for u and nobody else.

#12 haldane13

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 26 posts
  • Joined: 20-February 02
  • Location:Brisbane

Posted 06 June 2002 - 09:05 PM

If it works for you go for it. I used to wear KT26,s for many years in my younger days and found them quite OK EXCEPT when running in the wet. They may well have improved in that area.

Because you are wearing sorbathane,s I think you are pretty safe. I also wear sorbathane,s again due to recent ankle problems as well as orthotics and I generally buy may shoes at sales, last years models, and they cover a variety of brands.

I also train on average with 3 pairs of shoes at any time and with different levels of wear and that has kept my injuries down from what they used to be.

The only reason I changed from KT26,S is because of the wet weather problem and I believed that I may get better alround support with "proper?" running shoes.

I also agree with Tim,s last sentence.


#13 wannabeagreyhound

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 132 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 02

Posted 07 June 2002 - 09:00 AM

After consideration on this subject I think the most prudent way to go about this from my perspective would be to continue using the kt26 in training leading up to the Melbourne marathon then breaking in a new trendy pair of shoes that Ill keep only for race days thus prolonging the life of the shoe while the cheaper kt26 slogs out the training k's.

Daz


#14 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 07 June 2002 - 09:34 PM

Despite some comments above I have no interest in selling shoes. I used KT26s and other lightweight shoes for hiking for many years and for running 5 - 10 km, but got bruised feet once I started running 20 - 30 km on concrete (Bay trail) every Sunday. Daz I'd say whatever shoes you want to run the marathon in, test them at least once on a 20 to 30 km run first. Professional fitting is important. I lost several toe nails when I used my tennis shoes in a half marathon. Bottom line is to find what works for you, before the big day. Good luck!

#15 hollie

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 44 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Penrith

Posted 10 June 2002 - 08:23 PM

Why not run in the gel bondi racing fats retailed for $165.00 at Rebel Sport. I have been wearin the `bondi's` for the last two years and they are the top shoe!Hollie (11yrs old)

#16 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 13 June 2002 - 03:17 PM

I now run in 2070's and love them, but I must be honest I ran my fastest marathon (3.10) in a pair
of KT26's. So who knows?

#17 wannabeagreyhound

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 132 posts
  • Joined: 07-May 02

Posted 13 June 2002 - 03:41 PM

I think at the end of the day there is more expensive shoes out there with some advancements that have occured over the years but value wise the old dunlop lives on.

#18 Athletic Andy

    Newbie

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 02
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 14 June 2002 - 01:47 PM

I think the shoes I run in are called Nike Air Chapukas or something..... theyre not bad at all.... I use em for long distance, street running whatever... they're better over short distances I guess but they are EXTREMELY light.... for longer distances the adidas ozmosis is also very good.

But remember, a bad tradesman always balmes his tools... hehehe.


#19 PeterW

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 02
  • Location:Werribee

Posted 14 June 2002 - 08:28 PM

I tried the kt26's for a short period and the only problem I had was they wore out very quickly,I paid a small amount for the shoe but I was replacing them a lot more regularily. In the end I found it cheaper to buy my preferred brand, Brooks. In the long run (no pun intended) the brooks are easier on both my wallet and my legs.

The only thing I would recommend against is your thought of buying an "elite" pair for the marathon. Confidence in your runners is one less problem you want to experience on the day. If you want to trial some other runners I would be starting now.


#20 Jogger

    CoolRunner

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,272 posts
  • Joined: 01-August 01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 10 December 2005 - 07:52 PM

Lee Troop said he started running in a pair of Dunlop Volley shoes. He said this:

"It's not shoes that make the athlete - it's the amount of determination and heart,"