Suitable Marathon Racing Flat
#1
Posted 13 January 2004 - 07:09 PM
Any suggestions would be appreciated!
Macca
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 13 January 2004 - 07:27 PM
#3
Posted 13 January 2004 - 08:56 PM
#4
Posted 14 January 2004 - 06:55 AM
Anyway, most racing flats should be suitable for a marathon, depending on which ones fit the runner best and so on. The only ones I would advise against are those ultra light ones, i.e. Adidas Converter and its ilk.
Disclaimer: I'm not a podiatrist, so take the any advice with a grain of salt.
Yeti
#5
Posted 14 January 2004 - 02:46 PM
I would recommend the Brooks Burn. I have been running in these for 6 months + and found them very supportive. I have run 5-10k road & XC in them and would recommend them for the marathon.
cheers
#6
Posted 14 January 2004 - 03:00 PM
#7
Posted 14 January 2004 - 03:03 PM
They have been great for me and as a point of reference, I'm 73kgs and ran 2.57.
Good luck with your choice.
#8
Posted 14 January 2004 - 04:33 PM
I also run marathons in the DS trainers and have a pair of the old and new models. I weight in at just under 95kgs and have had no problems with either pair.
Fish
#9
Posted 14 January 2004 - 07:55 PM
Have recently swapped to DS trainers and have had no problems with them. havent ran a marathon in them however.
There is a new model just been released but not sure if its the same shoe with different colours or they have made changes to the shoe.
Ian C :)
#10 Guest_judo_*
Posted 15 January 2004 - 12:17 AM
#11
Posted 15 January 2004 - 11:46 AM
I have run a couple of marathons in them with no dramas.
#12
Posted 15 January 2004 - 05:12 PM
What about Asics Gel Kayano? Is this a good choice? I am 173cms and 58kgs...
#13
Posted 15 January 2004 - 06:09 PM
#14
Posted 15 January 2004 - 07:08 PM
This is from the website:
Gel D.S. Racer V - Racing
A lightweight yet supportive racing flat with minimum overlays engineered for distances from 5K to marathon.
Weight : 250 grams
Mens Gel D.S.Trainer IX - Structured Cushioning
The GEL DS Trainer is a pinnacle, lightweight-training and racing shoe that extends the shock attenuation and stability principles of I.G.S. to enhance forefoot function. The DS Trainer IX is now slip lasted, which is conductive to it's I.G.S. design concept. Now with BIOMORPHIC FIT.
Weight : 295 gr (size 9)
I've worn ds racers for a dozen or so years for my road marathons and have found that sometimes the latest model hasn't been as good to me as it's predecessor. This time all i can say is that i appear to get a lump under the front of my foot (as though there is a stone in the gel ???), which really i only feel after 30 odd K's (and have solved by wearing a thick insole on that foot - of course losing that weight adavntage !!).
The Gel Magic racer is even lighter (215 Grams), but for mine wears way too fast and would recommend only for half marathons (last used at Moe 6 Hour as the track is cushioned so couldn't be bothered about the lack of cushioning).
Asuming that lump problem isn't a standard one (sure someone else has mentioned it to me though), i'd definitely recommend them.
I'm 182 CM & 65 KG's if that helps
Kelvin ;)
#15
Posted 16 January 2004 - 11:11 AM
The new ds trainers have quite a thin forefoot, so depending on where you strike they might not be the best option.
Some other good options include the Brooks Burn, the Adidas supernova comp, and the Adidas Rotterdam.
The Brooks burn is a lightweight trainer, much lighter than the ds trainer. It has a very thick modfoot and forefoot and although it is a neutral shoe, it is set on a lateral cambre to minimise overpronation.
The supernova comp. is similar to the taper, it's predescessor. Again it is lighter than the ds trainer and has a cushioned forefoot and pronation block.
the Rotterdam (named after the marathon) is a neutral, lightweight shoe designed for the marathon. It has a very thick and cushioned midfoot and forefoot. It is a neutral shoe.
The best thing you can do is go to a shop that has a large range of light trainers/heavy racers and try them all on. Hope this helps.
cheers, Miles
#16
Posted 16 January 2004 - 11:16 AM















