Jump to content


ASICS Kayano's


  • You cannot reply to this topic
55 replies to this topic

#1 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 17 July 2002 - 09:00 AM

Hi guys. I bought a pair of Kayano's a couple of months ago. I pronate on both feet, especially the right. The Kayano has a stabilising support inside the shoe. This works great for keeping my feet upright however the downside is that the shoes are cutting my feet to pieces. Whenever I go for a run I need to strap both feet to stop the blisters. I was standing around at the end of the Gold Coast Marathon the other weekend and everyone was talking about how good Asics are, I agreed with them but I didnt tell them about the half a kilo of tape on my feet that I needed to get through the race. I have tried to contact Asics Australia but their website doesnt have a contact facility and they dont have a phone number. The long and short of this post is "Has anyone else had this problem, and how can I contact Asics to get some feedback".

Support our Australian advertisers:

#2 Gunther Norman

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 02

Posted 17 July 2002 - 09:31 AM

Neal my friend, at last I have found a 'fellow Kayano Sufferer'. I bought a pair from Rebel at Xmas and after about 6 or 7 runs I found I was suffering corns and blisters on both feet from my middle toe out to the smallest one. The shoes felt great but jesus the pain !. I eventually lost a toenail which was the last straw. I contacted Rebel who sent them to Asics for fault detection which came back negative so growing frustrated I contacted Asics directly who were very helpful. They explained that if I was a size 9 normal shoe then the retailer should of recommended a shoe half size bigger than normal because they have a narrower taper toward the toe. At last I had an answer for my suffering. I then went back to Rebel kicked up a stink and they swapped them for some Wave Creations which are great. The moral of the story is that Asics were helpful and gave me some leverage to go back to Rebel and complain and ultimately get a result. I will see if I can find the number for you and will post it. By the way I hate using tape too.

#3 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 17 July 2002 - 09:37 AM

Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.  :)

#4 Gunther Norman

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 02

Posted 17 July 2002 - 11:18 AM

Neal, ring asics sydney on 9647 2944 they should be able to help. Good luck

#5 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 18 July 2002 - 12:51 AM

Hi everyone - I run in Kayanos too and thought it must have been just me who had to tape my feet to avoid the blisters!  I am fine doing anything up to about 10km but after that without tape my feet are a mess.  I am ready for a new pair of shoes so will have to reconsider whether to go with Kayanos again (trying the half size too big method).  Thanks!

#6 Gunther Norman

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 31 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 02

Posted 17 July 2002 - 01:28 PM

Sue,
Fur alle, die uber eienen langeren Zeitraum Kontinvierlich Deutch lernean, aber nicht auf die vorzuge eines Klengruppenkurses !

Auf Weidersehn


#7 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 17 July 2002 - 01:53 PM

Hi,

I also used to get blisters with Kayano's. The VII was fine but the VIII was terrible. I bought these at Athlete's Foot.

I then went to the Runners Shop in Randwick. I was told that the Kayano's gave far too much support for mild pronators and that I should try the Gel 1070's - half the price of Kayano. Have done this and no problems (apart from the tongue coming out which was fixed by a new pair without any hassles).

The moral of the story to me is to forget about Rebel/Athletes foot etc. These guys are more interested in selling expensive but inappropriate shooes than getting shoes to fit feet and meet equirements.

Find a good shop specifically for runners.


#8 MICHAEL M

    Newbie

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:MELBOURNE

Posted 17 July 2002 - 02:08 PM

Have you tried Saucony Hurricanes?

Sauconys are excellent fitting and often
overlooked running shoes.

I recommend them with double insoles
for Mararathons, they still fit well and are stable.

After ten Mararathons in Sauconys I'm reluctant to use my ASICS.

I think with some ASICS you may have to buy them 1/2 a size bigger which should not
be the case. Kayanos are also an excellent shoe, if the fit is right, but quite dear (compared with ASICS 2070s & the like.)


#9 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 17 July 2002 - 02:36 PM

Michael, I'm with you. Until I bought these Kayano's I was very much a Saucony Fan. I think from a pronate perspective the Grid system that Saucony uses is the best, it gives you return no matter what angle your foot is on. The Kayano tries to do the same thing by holding your foot up-right in what to most people would be an un-natural position. Since posting my original message I have emailed Asics Australia (got the details from the message board) and let them know that there are some people out there that are not so happy Asics owners. I am waiting with baited breath to see if I get a reply.

#10 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 17 July 2002 - 02:50 PM

Similar story... I bought a pair of Kayanos a few weeks ago. I had done numerous runs up to about 10 kms without a problem, but my first 20+ km run in them (last Saturday) led to a bleeding blister on my little toe. I tried running again a few days later (Tuesday night, 10 km) and got a new blister and lots more blood over the same spot - I guess I'll have to stop running for a week or so to let it heal properly. I'm a bit annoyed - I had planned to use these in the Melb Half Marathon in October.

Any advice on helping blisters heal and taping techniques to stop re-occurrence? This is my first major blister that has actually stopped me running.


#11 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 17 July 2002 - 02:56 PM

Mick. Obviously I have the same problem. Besides all the other blisters on my arch I also got a bad blister on my little toe during the Gold Coast. I dont believe that you can toughen up your feet, even though lots of people will tell you how to do it. The only solution I know of is to somehow strap the spot that gets the blister. Two socks will always work but not many people buy runners thinking that they will be wearing two sets of socks so they dont buy them big enough. Cant really help more than that. Good luck with the Melbourne Half.

#12 Jogger

    CoolRunner

  • Administrator
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,376 posts
  • Joined: 01-August 01
  • Sex:Male
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 17 July 2002 - 03:12 PM

The "bible" in ultra marathon circles for taping feet is - subscribing to the free email list gives a monthly newsletter of good tips also - you should subscribe evn if you only read the archives.

#13 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 17 July 2002 - 03:59 PM

If you're getting blisters, try Emu oil.  For small blisters (size 5 cents or less) it will clear them up over night.  For large blisters (50 cents plus - yep, these babies hurt), it won't clear them, but it will toughen the skin under the blister enough so when the blister falls off you can get straight back into hard training.

I like Ascis and feel confident when I recommend them to friends, but I'll always push people towards the 2070's. I think the Kayano's a little flashy and a lot expensive.  I now run in Saucony and Muzuno and have had very few problems.


#14 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 19 July 2002 - 12:01 AM

AArrrghhh!!! Now I have no idea....I have only just taken up running.. currently using an old pair of New Balance cross trainers.  I realise that they are no good for me so I went into Athletes Foot...apparently I roll in a VERY VERY lot. Tried on a few different brands/makes (Brooks/Asics etc)..and the two they recommended were absolute bricks..provided plenty of support but were very heavy.  I tried on a pair of Kayano's (with a generic orthotic inserted) and they felt perfect.  I am normally a size 12 but I tried the size 13 and it was fine.  I am happy to pay the $250 odd they cost if they are the right shoe for me.

I haven't bought them yet, but should I consider another brand if everyone seems to have trouble with Kayanos??  My biggest problem is that I roll in A LOT.  Also I don't plan to be doing long runs..up to 10km will probably be longest...

Thanks for any advice...


#15 love em' hills

    Newbie

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Joined: 16-July 02

Posted 18 July 2002 - 01:42 PM

Newbie - the Brooks Beast..okay so they are a bit on the heavy side but the support they give is more than worth it, especially for training on pavements and on trails. What's more, when you slip on a pair of lighter shoes for racing you feel that much more quicker. Give them a go. If however they are just to heavy for you then try the Mizuno 'Wave Creation' another excellent shoe. But being size 12 I would suspect you better off in the Beasts.

#16 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 18 July 2002 - 04:42 PM

I have been running for two years and have only ever worn asics as I was told by a running shop they are the best.  I have had three styles and have had blisters and lost toe nails while wearing all of them. I hought this was normal being a distance runner.  After running a marathon I lost 4 toenails and had 2 really bad blood blisters.
I thought nothing of it until reading all your comments.  Maybe I should be daring and try a different and cheaper brand.

#17 gunnin'

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 94 posts
  • Joined: 13-November 01
  • Location:Melbourne

Posted 18 July 2002 - 07:17 PM

Just a couple of points. No one's mentioned socks. Make sure your socks are up to scratch, not too thin or too old and crispy. If I have a blister I cover it with the ends of those thin plastic bandaids, feels like nothing's there compared to tape. And finally,if you're in Melbourne, don't pay $250 for your Kayano's, get them for $185 from Leo Russell's in Preston (Gilbert Rd.)like I just have.
Cheers!

#18 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 18 July 2002 - 07:18 PM

The Beasts go well. I agree, quite chunky and heavy but the support and cumfort are worth it.
As Mark said, put some flats on after some long k's in the Beasts and you're flying.

#19 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 19 July 2002 - 09:02 AM

After reading the numerous posts on this topic, I would like to say, that in my opinion, getting the correct fit is as important as the right style of shoe.

I have been running 4 years, including 9 marathons in the last 2 1/4 years, and I have NEVER had a blackened or lost toenail, and I have only had blisters very rarely.  I have run in a number of shoes from New Balance, Brooks, and now Asics.  I attribute my lack of foot problems to always buying a shoe with plenty of toe room, but not loose enough to allow heel movement.  I agree with previous comments that you should buy running shoes in a larger size than your normal walking shoes.  I always buy from the Runner's Shop in Canberra, and benefit from their specific knowledge of running requirements.


#20 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 20 July 2002 - 12:40 AM

Hi just regarding the blisters.

An easy solution is to use methylated spirits. Just put a bit on a pad of tissues and then hold against the blister. This will help dry the blisters up.

However if you are unfortunate enough to have a blister that has lost its top then just get some Quick-heal bandaids. They do the trick.

Hope this helps.


#21 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 20 July 2002 - 01:29 PM

Newbie, don't buy a pair of Kayanos if you're just planning on running up to 10 km's. A pair of Asics 2070's are cheaper and will do you fine, or even a pair of Asics 1070's. 2070's have gel at front and back of shoe, 1070's only at back of shoe.
I bought a pair of Kayano's this year for the first time, and ran the gold coast marathon in them. No blisters, loss of toenails, gangrene, etc.
However, they did not feel significantly better than 2070's, so I don't plan on buying any more Kayano's. In fact, didn't feel as good as 2070's, in the opinion of my feet.
No-one should pay $249 for Kayano's - shop around and you will find them for less if you have the urge to buy them.
Athlete's Foot had them for $199 during half yearly sale.

#22 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 20 July 2002 - 03:08 PM

Hi all
I over pronate, and use prescribed orthotics - very much well worth the $400 investment - have had 5 years out of them so far, and still going strong.
This reduces the need to have to most expensive shoe on the market.
That said, I use Asics MC Plus for motion control, but the last lot have just crept over $200 ($180 is my limit), and don't seem to offer the stability of the previous.
So I'm probably going to go back to the 2070's.
By the way, try www.justasics.com.au - I haven't used them, but the shoes are cheap.

I think over pronators are tougher on their shoes (you should see how my old ones lean over, and the wear on the sole), so don't go too light or cheap - a good mid-range shoe.

I have not had a single blister since I started using petroleum jelly on my toes - even in 2 Melb marathons.

Keep on running


#23 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 20 July 2002 - 07:20 PM

Kayanos are good if you have a "standard" foot.  I am a bit wider and after a blister free 3 years in Puma's, moved to Asics for the extra cushioning given my extra distance lately.  Asics Nimbus are a bit wider and great comfort but not good for heavy pronaters - but better for me.
If you don't do 40+ k's per week, try Puma.
I would like Asics to have a wider fit on Kayanos and Nimbus - I think we Aussies have fat feet.

#24 Nicky

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 02
  • Location:JANDOWAE

Posted 22 July 2002 - 02:34 PM

Well,well well, this topic is a blessing in disguise, I also have been to the wonderful-atheletes foot, thought I was doing the right thing for my running, feet & body but have suffered from the feet up, when told I needed Asics kyanos for my overpronation, mortons toe, which in turn,I take an 8 1/2 to 9 & was told tens, for my mortons toe??? hell no's why, as I told the guy they slipped & he said to tighten the laces & when I'm out running they will be fine. I also have a broad foot & wear socks, good socks, so how can they ( athletes foot) call them selves, experts if we are all having such problems, I use to believe it was the shoes but... it is the fit . Because we need cushioning &stability they grab for the top shelf...
I always ran in puma's with alittle help of padding from the podiatrist & never had a problem ever!!!   I now have a $250 pair of shoes I don't wear & my husband is furious as I don't think we can take these back, there a little dirty from wearing them in the beginning to see if they would come good, I live in the country so alot of dirt roads. BOY THIS TOPIC SHOULD BE SENT TO ASIC, ATHLETES FOOT, ETC....   NIK!!

#25 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 23 July 2002 - 03:48 PM

Same problem. After 4 blister free years of New Balance running, I bought a pair of Kayanos. Result? Immediate blistering on a short (9 k) run. I did buy them from Athlete's Foot, who happily replaced them (even with some dubious deposits on the soles) with a pair of Brooks Trance NXGs. I am a slim 90Kg pronater on size 12s. I have so far run up to 26 k on the NXGs with no sign of a blister. I'd have to give them the thumbs up.

#26 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 23 July 2002 - 08:44 PM

Sorry to all who have brought Kayano's but the truth is that your not get value for money. Between Kayano & 2060 there's really no difference. The reason Asics promote the Kayano so much is because there more profit in them. The only real difference from a 2070 to Kayano is the SPEVA which is a "proprietary midsole material that improves bounce back & characteristics and decrease midsole breakdown" quoted directly from asics. What this means is nothing except it sounds good to the customer.
Having ripped the kayano off completly i will say some find it does suit there foot better, however as a customer don't spend anymore than you really have too, know shops that stock the kayano will sell it first because there's more profit for them & asics then selling a 2070 or 1070.

#27 John

    Newbie

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Joined: 24-July 02
  • Location:Sydney

Posted 24 July 2002 - 01:11 PM

Just to add to the Kayano feedback....
I've run in about the last 6 models and have always been extremely happy with them. I need to note though, that I always use custom orthotics, being an overpronator. Also, I have a fairly narrow foot, which the Kayano provides a very good fit for.

#28 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 24 July 2002 - 01:50 PM

Guys, seeing I started this discussion I think that I need to add as I get new information. I have spoken to the RunInn here in Brisbane and also a number of other people and it is possible that the problem with the Kayano's is more with the insert than the shoe itself. I went for a run last night and put some more blisters on top of my other blisters (they say we are all stupid). My observation was that it was the insert that was doing the rubbing and not the shoe. The RunInn stated that quite a lot of people have reported the same fault to them and they are recommending that people change their inserts and that this should fix most problems. I cant see how it would fix problems with the toes but certainly if you are getting blisters on the arch or further back then changing the inserts could be a possibility. I have changed mine and I will see how they go. Failing that Ascis has said that if I send my shoes to them they will replace them even though there is technically nothing wrong with them. The only problem with that is how does a runner do without his shoes for a week or two, I will be going up the walls.

#29 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 24 July 2002 - 02:17 PM

I have never worn the Kayano, but had similar blister problems with some of the earlier 20xx range (the 2050 I think) as ASICS had built up the arch / insert.  As a result of lots of complaints from people like me, ASICS then lowered the arch again in the range - it pays to contact them so that they take it into account for future shoes.
In the interim, I used the 1050. which solved the blister problem but didn't have forefoot cushioning.  To correct Chris' comment - the 1070 now does have forefoot cushioning, and if you don't need the support of the 2070 or the Kayano, it's a great (and much cheaper) option - it's working for me anyway.

#30 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 24 July 2002 - 03:08 PM

Just a further note. I have been speaking with a Stuart at Asics Australia. He is their PR officer (I think). I emailed this whole notice board to him yesterday, he read it and has forwarded the whole thing to their R&D department. All is not in vain.

#31 Thomas

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 477 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 02
  • Sex:Male
  • Location:Greenwich NSW

Posted 24 July 2002 - 04:50 PM

Hi Neal, I've been wearing Kayanos for a number of years and have never had blisters - not one - until I bought the current model about 2 weeks ago. I was getting blistered under both arches. So I pulled the inserts out of my last pair and put them in the new - and you guessed it no more blisters.

#32 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 29 July 2002 - 02:54 PM

Just an update on my previous post. Now my blisters a basically healed, I went for another 20+ km run in my newish Kayanos - no real problems this time - I covered the healed blisters with Scholl anti-blister padding and felt comfortable. Perhaps it is just a matter of me wearing them in slowly.

#33 Rob

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts
  • Joined: 28-October 01
  • Location:Sydney Australia

Posted 29 July 2002 - 09:41 PM

I've never had problems (or blisters) in over 2000km of running in Kayanos. I'm onto the 3rd pair and have never paid more that $180. Whilst the postings here encourage me to try the 2070s I don't want to experiment with my comfort.
As for the issue of correct fit, the best we can hope for is for Asics to withdraw from selling via Athletes Foot!

#34 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 30 July 2002 - 07:56 AM

Rob, I am starting to realise that the problem with the Kayano's is exclusive to the VIII's and then to the insert only. If you have had the models before the VIII's then there doesnt seem to be a problem.

#35 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 10 August 2002 - 04:40 PM

Hi all, regarding the poor old kayano and blisters. No mattrer haw many sports magazines i pick up i always see a full page advert. for the kayano, All i can say is MOST EXPENSIVE SHOE = MOST PROFIT (GOOD ON YA ASICS) always buy your shoes from someone who runs.. HOW CAN 1 SHOE SUIT EVERYONE.

#36 Nicky

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Joined: 14-July 02
  • Location:JANDOWAE

Posted 10 August 2002 - 10:01 PM

I posted a note on this topic awhile ago & its still being discussed, I have to say I was very mad at the athletes foot, when given the wrong size shoe, but I have to say I got the courage after seeing a physio that confirmed my problem with the kyano VIII, to take them back an ask for the right size & they did, I was shocked ,that they would say tuff...,& there worn & can't be sold & she did say that but also understood that a smooth salesman ,no longer employed there, had sold me the dearest shoe in the shop with the wrong fit.With  the physios help thing are looking up,These shoes are good but still overpriced... WE all learn & live, sometimes the hard way!!

#37 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 11 August 2002 - 04:37 PM

talk to Phil at Southside Runners shop  02 9545 6010 about the changes in Asics shoes & quality . i found out lots about 3 months ago. it appears to me that he was a wake up to asics changes ages ago. he run tests all new models & rejects shoes.i found most retailers of running shoes just accept their stock without evaluation & Phil knew all the models & characteristics back to 1980 .another trick to buying shoes i found is that all models are different sizes !!and shapes!!

#38 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 11 August 2002 - 08:33 PM

Asics has changed the motion control of the 2060 making the new 2070 quite similar to the Kayano.
Something to keep in mind however... the Asics Kayano is a shoe designed for longer distances of running. The cushioning is therefore FIRMER than the 2070 which CAN cause problems such as those discussed.
Also discussed - a softer cushioned innersole can help, as can a change of socks - I recommend any brand containing the 'Coolmax' material.

#39 Dang

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 140 posts
  • Joined: 11-August 02
  • Location:sydney

Posted 11 August 2002 - 10:49 PM

For more feedback on kayanos see www.roadrunnersports.com . a usa site which has a message board for all brands /models.

#40 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 12 August 2002 - 02:11 PM

I have been wearing Kayanos with orthotics on the advice of a podiatrist.  I really enjoyed running in them but needed to replace them while on a recent trip to the US.  The prices of Kayanos are ~$280, so I thought I would try the latest in 20XX range as a cheaper alternative - no luck.  Bought the Kayano's when I got back to Sydney and am getting blisters on both arches - still with the old orthotics - so must be more than just the inserts.  I had the same problem with another series of ASICS years ago and had to change models (thanks advice from the Runners Shop at Clovelly). At over $200 it's an expensive mistake to make

#41 Guest__*

  • Guests
  • Joined: --

Posted 15 August 2002 - 05:00 PM

I am into my 5th pair of Kayano's - last 2 pairs through www.justasics.com.au so they cost well under $200.  Always have worn custom orthotics (plug here for The Running Clinic in North Sydney).  I also have a pair of 2050s which I was alternating with the Kayanos.  Performance during the runs?  Very little difference between shoe models EXCEPT that I get 1000k out of a pair of Kayanos and only 750k out of the 2050s.  So, I am sticking with the Kayanos - no real cost difference in the long run.

#42 Shamu

    Newbie

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 1 posts
  • Joined: 16-August 02
  • Location:central coast

Posted 16 August 2002 - 08:25 PM

Holly cow i can not believe so many unhappy people,
It's really sad to think that you can't go into a shop anymore and get the correct advise on shoes.
I use to work for a major sports shoe store which im not going to mention but i am so happy with everything that i learnt whilst working there...
One major thing i need to disclose though was if your not happy with your fit return it and get another shoe....
**Also a comment i need to make is that the Kayano is not a shoe for people who pronate.
it is a shoe for a fairly normal foot.
***And heres a bit of inside info for you
Is that if you ever open a kayano up it doesn't actually contain "GEL".. more like foam and soft rubber !!!! the size of a 1/4 of a $5 dollar note...

Brooks Trance for that matter has hydroflow which is like a gel but thinner and you can
even remove your inner sole and see right through the other side so you know what your paying for...

Brooks Trance is compared with the Kayano so maybe you could go try it on very comfortable shoe..

Wide toe box so No Blisters...   :)


#43 jack ivey

    Newbie

  • Forum Member
  • Pip
  • 3 posts
  • Joined: 19-August 02
  • Location:wagga wagga

Posted 19 August 2002 - 01:23 PM

if blisters are a problem soak your feet in condies cyrstals once a day it toughens the skin and also acts as a antiseptic killing off fungal and stuff better than metho as metho toughens only the outer layers not the deeper layers of skin this may result in deep friction burns . works for us in the army and ive used the same method when training for the goldcoast marathon after the race i didnt have a problem works for me anyway :        :)

#44 Tuttle

    1000-club gold-rated CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,054 posts
  • Joined: 11-September 02
  • Sex:Male
  • Location:Brisbane

Posted 21 November 2002 - 06:52 AM

The Kayano saga continues.......I've just done an easy 10k run; at the end of the run, when I looked at my right foot, I realized why it had been feeling sore - the blister on top of the 2nd toe (which has become evident every time I run in the Kayanos) had burst, and now the shoe is - pardon the expression - something of a bloody mess (like my toe and sock).  I notice from this thread that "Neal" was able to establish email contact with "Stuart" at Asics.  Neal, I'm wondering if you'd be able to pass on the email address, so I can let Asics know of my hassle.
Cheers and thanks,
Capt. Tuttle

#45 Neal

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • Joined: 17-July 02
  • Location:Toowoomba

Posted 21 November 2002 - 07:43 AM

Hi;

Been awhile since someone has put something in here. My saga with the Kayano's ended about 2 months ago when I bought some generic inserts from my local A-Mart. I havent had any problems since then. I have looked through my address book etc and I cant find the phone number or email for ASICS Australia but I got the number through my local running store and I am sure that you could do the same. From all that I have read and heard from people it is the inserts that are the problem. When I need a new pair of shoes I certainly wont be buying the Kayano's. Good luck.


#46 Winston

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 219 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 02
  • Location:Melbourne Vic

Posted 21 November 2002 - 07:52 AM

Good to hear that your problem has been fixed. I still find it amazing at how nieve people are today. Example, if you are going to tour around australia, going over harsh terrain and rivers rocks etc, im sure you wouldnt use the humble family sedan, it might do ok but there are better options, something that will be better suited to your needs like a 4x4 possibly. Same goes for feet and shoes. Look into things a little more closely next time before you make remarks about things that some of you have no real knowledge about. I know this sounds harsh but some people should understand what they are talking about before they start making accusations about certain things. Enough said.. happy running!

#47 punkbandit

    CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts
  • Joined: 15-October 02
  • Location:Melb

Posted 21 November 2002 - 08:52 AM

Hey Captain T,

Mark yer email Attn Stuart and send it to asics@asics.com.au.  I know it looks like a general email address, but he personally gave it to me so its a good one.

I have been visiting podiatrists and throwing money at shoes for a while now, and have tried both the kayanos VIII and the new trance.  They are both crap for my needs.  Your best hope would be i reckon, if Stewy gives you some new replacement kayanos, would be to trade them at athletes foot for something else.

Brooks vapor bends in all the right places for me (so did trance 2 models ago - new ones too soft), and only costs $115 at rebel sports this week apparently.  It feels great to have sorted out my shoe problem for $115 after the money I have spent in the past.

Good Luck


#48 Tuttle

    1000-club gold-rated CoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,054 posts
  • Joined: 11-September 02
  • Sex:Male
  • Location:Brisbane

Posted 21 November 2002 - 12:48 PM

Thanks for the email address and suggestion re. the Vapor.  I haven't tried that shoe, but I have had success with the Adrenaline.  I agree abt the Trance - too "cushy" and v def. overpriced.  We delude ourselves if we think that spending top dollars guarantees the 'best' shoe.

#49 Winston

    veryCoolRunner

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 219 posts
  • Joined: 14-August 02
  • Location:Melbourne Vic

Posted 22 November 2002 - 07:55 AM

My initial advive would be like the Valvoline commercial, if your on a good thing stick to it! If the Adrenaline worked once before stay with it. Its very hard sometimes to get consistency with runnning shoes as they always try to improve them and update them to make them better.. this changes the shoe and not all changes are good for individuals unfortunately.
The Trance of old you mentioned, the Adrenaline and Vapor are 3 very different shoes, different ammounts of stability, cushioning, durability and fit. To say what is good for one wont necessarily be good for another. Unfortunately it can be expensive experimentation thats why seeking advice from many different sources, ones that might have some actuall scientific backing to them not just peoples opinions which fly around in here quite often! An understanding onf not only foot type but foot concerns and shoe properties relevant to needs. After this message i would go and do some research for yourself and stop listening to some of the rubbish people publish in here. Sure OPINIONS can be helpful and to pick up a shoe at $115 is awesome but how do you know that its the right one for you? Will you skimp on $$$ and sacrafice your body? I am not saying however that the most xpensive shoe is the best one and when you are saying the Trance is over priced then what is the Kayano with 1/3rd the technology the trance has?

#50 Colin

    Still dreaming...

  • Forum Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,239 posts
  • Joined: 13-February 02
  • Sex:Male
  • Location:Kings Langley

Posted 22 November 2002 - 09:54 AM

I have been running marathons for 25yrs and have biomech problems that would make me injury prone if I were to wear the wrong type of shoe. However, on todays value, I have never bought shoes that are over $100, and I cannot understand why people would be forking out $250 hwen most of them don't even train with half the intensity that I do. I suppose if you are new then you wouldn't have much time to trial and error, but you will find the shoe for you. As an example, the NB 763 works for me. Now they have upgraded this and I think call it the 764, but it only has superficial changes, and double the price. You can still get the old one for about $80! If the old shoe has worked so well for so long, what have they suddenly discovered in running injuries that that has necessitated a change in design, the major thing being a change in colour?