Choice Magazine Shoe Poll
#1
Posted 30 January 2004 - 10:58 PM
Support our Australian advertisers:
#3
Posted 08 February 2004 - 08:43 PM
#4
Posted 08 February 2004 - 08:47 PM
#5
Posted 08 February 2004 - 09:08 PM
#6
Posted 08 February 2004 - 09:08 PM
#7
Posted 08 February 2004 - 09:09 PM
Originally posted by KevinTiller:
Plodder - I think that was the point - we used the same options as per the chhoice magazine article, knowing that if they used a real runner, they would have picked shoes that runners wore !
[/indent]Snap!
#8
Posted 12 February 2004 - 02:30 AM
#9
Posted 25 February 2004 - 04:23 AM
#10
Posted 25 February 2004 - 02:20 PM
#11
Posted 25 February 2004 - 02:30 PM
Originally posted by roodrunner:
I was surprised not to see the old DUNLOP VOLLEYS listed ,LOL
[/indent]Don't laugh - while Johhny Dark and I were waiting (and this was pretty close to the front of the A starters) for the City 2 Surf last year, we spied a fellow wearing a pair of these - and they were stuffed. I hate to think what 14k in those would do to your feet...
#12
Posted 25 February 2004 - 02:41 PM
As a testament to what generations of runners before us wore not only will I do the Gold Coast Marathon in the retro outfit described above, I'll do it sub 2hr50min - just to prove that at the end of the day that gel and air cushioning, coolmax clothing and the like (all of which I own) is just a gimmick to get us to part with more of our hard earned.
#13
Posted 25 February 2004 - 05:18 PM
#14
Posted 25 February 2004 - 05:28 PM
#15
Posted 25 February 2004 - 07:51 PM
Originally posted by awiseman:
Three different Mizuni models and only one Asic. Was there some push polling going on here? tut tut Choice.
[/indent]Or, perhaps, ASICS realized how deeply flawed the whole exercise was going to be, and decided against "wasting" too many shoes.
#16
Posted 26 February 2004 - 03:35 PM
#17
Posted 26 February 2004 - 04:02 PM
#18
Posted 26 February 2004 - 04:09 PM
tim
#19
Posted 26 February 2004 - 05:05 PM
TRAIN HARD, DONT EAT PROCESSED FOODS
#20
Posted 26 February 2004 - 07:30 PM
[QB] bring back the 70's.
I didn't realize the 70s ever went away!
When I bought my first pair of KT26s I though they were the greatest running shoes I'd ever owned - which they probably were, up to that point.
KT 26s @ 25 dollars hey? 7 pairs of KTs, or 1 pair of Kayanos?
#21
Posted 26 February 2004 - 08:18 PM
Tuttle, where do you manage to buy Kayanos for $3.50?!
#22
Posted 27 February 2004 - 01:44 AM
Another little known fact is the name of the shoe was shortened to 'KT' in 1976 after the big hitters in the marketing department at Dunlop deemed that the 'Kevin Tiller 14' just wasnt doing it for the punters after dismal sales, despite a hirsuit Deek wearing them in all his glory winning thats years c2s.
Suffice to say a wounded Tiller vowed never to enter into the design fray again, instead concentrating all his energy into a new phenomenon, the personal computer.
And that my friends, is how cool running was born! ;)
Now, off to Apres we go!
(No disrespect Kevin, I couldnt help myself!)
#23
Posted 27 February 2004 - 11:19 AM
Well, if I don't say it, someone else will ...
Tuttle, where do you manage to buy Kayanos for $3.50?!
[/indent]Perhaps we should start a thread about 'Falling Down while Posting' :)
#24
Posted 27 February 2004 - 02:14 PM
#25
Posted 27 February 2004 - 02:52 PM
#26
Posted 28 February 2004 - 02:11 PM
I can supply a pair of Kayano's for $3.50. 1 owner, just run in, only 1,000 careful kilometre's on the clock... like new! :D















