shoes - trail v's road
#1
Posted 01 April 2004 - 09:10 PM
any thoughts?
tim
Support our Australian advertisers:
#2
Posted 01 April 2004 - 09:20 PM
Nothing matches your KT26s.
#3
Posted 01 April 2004 - 09:29 PM
now I think about it, I probably will still run shorter runs in them though so I guess KT and I will still be friends.
I wonder if the Volley would be any good?tim
#4
Posted 01 April 2004 - 10:08 PM
I also like a lot of off-road running and have even experimented with a trail shoe (it was a NB one). However I have found that my regular "road" shoes are quite adequate. Currently I am using Brooks Addiction but have run off-road with all sorts of shoes, over a number of years and a number of terrains, and I can't say that I have ever found this solution lacking in any way.
I half-suspect that trail shoes are a solution looking for a problem. The logic is good ("I run trails so need a trail shoe") but I just don't believe it.
#5
Posted 01 April 2004 - 10:32 PM
actually bought a pair of trail shoes the other month.
have used them once.
road shoes will get u thru almost any australian trail event.
exceptions? anyone?
#6
Posted 01 April 2004 - 11:07 PM
I run in trail shoes :D ! Asics Trabuco which they've now discontinued & introduced the 1080trail instead.
I find they give me great traction on the trails I run, which are mainly forestry fire trails that have a really uneven surface as well as gravelly, rocky,hilly, and when wet, really muddy & slippery. I used to run in regular runners but found I was slipping & sliding a lot so I made the change & haven't looked back as most of my running is in the trails.
I use Asics Nimbus for my road/city running but I'd never use them in the bush.
I guess everyone's different but I find the trails I run are easier & more fun to run in trail shoes & I don't have to worry about rolling an ankle or slipping over.
As the saying goes "different horses for different courses".
kazz.
#7
Posted 01 April 2004 - 11:08 PM
I train and race road in a different brand. Works well for me...
#8
Posted 01 April 2004 - 11:48 PM
Used to use Asics 2000 series, but they slip around a lot on the trail.
I only use the one pair and they are great on the road/ footpaths as well.
Personnally I think they are a great shoe
#9
Posted 02 April 2004 - 07:46 PM
All leading brands i know of make a trail version and some make multiple trail shoes like NB, Brooks, Asics and Nike to name a few. Brooks are releasing in June an Adrenaline trail shoe in two different uppers which is fantastic if thats your foot type. Most will have some type of water proofing aspect to them and more rugged outer sole.
Search the web for the different types, find out what shape you need for your foot and invest.
#10
Posted 02 April 2004 - 07:50 PM
#11
Posted 02 April 2004 - 08:37 PM
#12
Posted 02 April 2004 - 10:36 PM
Most will have some type of water proofing aspect to them
[/indent]I think that the water proofing is more in the marketing then in the fact. My Asics Eagle Trail seem to let in water just as fast in the rain as my old 2000 series Asics :)
#13
Posted 02 April 2004 - 10:59 PM
Most will have some type of water proofing aspect to them and more rugged outer sole.
[/indent]Is water proofing relevant in Australian conditions? We don't run through snow that often. Seems like it'll just lead to problems- very sweaty feet, macerated skin, etc.
#14
Posted 03 April 2004 - 01:43 AM
The shoes I ran Melb Trailwalker in were Montrail Vitesse. I've had several pairs of them now. I ran the Marathon De Sables in a pair.
Their good features include outstanding traction on rough terrain, especially downhill; a plate in the insole which takes away the pain to the underfoot when you stand on a sharp rock in road shoes; plenty of room in the toebox; and a sole which virtually never wears out.
The one downside is that they are not flash on wet rocks or slippery surfaces. I also have the Leona Divides mentioned by Pastyboy. They are much better in the wet, but they come too high on my ankle bones and tear the skin off. If I tape the ankle bones, they bruise after several hours (I think I have low ankle bones).
The Divides also have a plate in the in-sole, but it doesn't seem as effective as the Vitesse. The Divides are better ventilated than the Vitesse, but the downside of that is that you get a lot of dust in your sox, which eventually can chafe between the toes. This is not a problem with the Vitesse, especially if you wear gators like the ones I wore at TW.
Both models are available from Snowgum, and are reasonably priced.
Regards
John
#15
Posted 03 April 2004 - 12:42 PM
tim
#16
Posted 10 May 2004 - 03:39 AM
I'm from Manila, Philippines. I know many of you Austrialians are health-conscious.
I would like to ask your recommendations or suggestions for a runner who wears his shoes out on the outer heel. Some would very likely call this as 'supination.'
I'm quite frustrated because the wear on the outer heel is so pronounced, its like someone sliced my sneakers just as one would slice a banana. Is there something wrong with the way I run?
If you'd look at the inner side of my shoes however, the wear would be very minimal. The outer heel however really gets worn out before any part of the rubber shoes even gets dirty.
I run mostly on asphalt roads.
Sometimes I feel I can't justify buying branded rubber shoes because after a short time.
Is there a particular shoe that you could recommend? Or method of running to change the way I run?
Thank you very much.
David
#17
Posted 10 May 2004 - 03:41 PM
#18
Posted 10 May 2004 - 11:43 PM
Originally posted by KevinTiller:
I half-suspect that trail shoes are a solution looking for a problem. The logic is good ("I run trails so need a trail shoe") but I just don't believe it.
[/indent]I agree with that. Just run a 50k trail run (www.harzquerung.de) in a pair of Adidas Taper whithout any problems - and wouldn't think of wearing anything heavier in a race !
Yeti
#19
Posted 22 June 2004 - 10:28 PM
So c'mon, get those kitchen scales out, and plonk your shoes on them for me :) . And if you get caught, your excuse is, it's for posterity ;) .
#20
Posted 23 June 2004 - 05:01 AM
I got a pair of ASICS "Gel Trabucco" trail shoes about a year ago as I do more trail than roads and thought a bit more grip would be better.
They weigh 396 grams each compared to 350g for the general purpose other shoes I use. This isn't much of a difference but I notice it, so I don't race in them or run more than 35 km in them. However, they are very comfortable and I have used them in a 24 hour rogaine with no blisters. In my opinion, they are ideal for events were speed is not quite the essence such as a rogaine or an orienteering event and they are great for bushwalking. That said, I know people who are happy to run Six Foot Track in them and finish in the top 30 - but I'm fairly lightly built so perhaps I notice a few grams more....
In fact the jelly cushioning - or whatever they use - and the fit, has converted me to the ASICS brand and I bought a pair of lighter weight ASICS "Cumulus" yesterday (350g). I used New Balance for about 20 years but for a few years they have put a plastic wedge on the instep of the model I like and this has somehow given me blisters on the instep, though to be fair only after many hours of use and when the shoe or foot gets a bit damp.
Ian
#21
Posted 23 June 2004 - 05:17 AM
Yes they are slightly heavier, but they are also a little stiffer on the sole which is good for trail/off road running. A nice feature I like is the seal around the tongue of the shoe to keep out dirt/grit. Coupled with gaiters for true bush running they seem to do the job well and certainly have better grip in loose/slippery situations.
#22
Posted 23 June 2004 - 07:20 PM
The Asics web site does have the weights of some of their shoes at http://www.asics.com.au/ However, this doesn't include Gel Guts or the Mesa Trail <_<
#23
Posted 23 June 2004 - 07:51 PM
Cheers.
#24
Posted 29 January 2005 - 01:00 AM
http://www.inov-8.com/Product.html
I could buy some online but am worried about buying a new brand in case the sizes are not consistent and hence not fit properly. Has anyone had exeperience of buying a new/different brand of shoe online, ie without physically trying them on?
#25
Posted 29 January 2005 - 02:26 AM
Asics have a new version of the Gel Eagle with a Goretex upper on the Korean Market.
I'm sure it'll be available in Australia soon. If not maybe try to order online.
Cheers
Owain
#26
Posted 30 January 2005 - 12:09 AM
When you go on a run that is all or mostly off-road, wear the trail shoes. My all-time favourite and best fitting pair of running shoes ever were Adidas Response Trails, bought at Footlocker on sale for $30.
At the moment, I'm using a pair of New Balance trail shoes - they were cheap ($50) and are excellent. Slightly heavier than my non-trail shoes, but who cares? On a lot of trails, you'll pick up clay and dirt anyway, and shoes can get really heavy. The traction seems so much better in the trail shoes.
As John Bingham says, waddle on friends! :)
#27
Posted 31 January 2005 - 12:39 PM















